Owls’ responses to forest conservation in the Alps
By:
References
- Ameztegui A, Gil-Tena A, Faus J, Pigué M, Brotons L & Camprodon J 2018: Bird community response in mountain pine forests of the Pyrenees managed under a shelterwood system. Forest Ecology and Management 407: 95–105. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.002</a>
- Angelstam P 2004: Habitat thresholds and effects of forest landscape change on the distribution and abundance of black grouse and capercaillie. Ecological Bulletins 51: 173–187.
- Bivand R & Wong D 2018: Comparing implementations of global and local indicators of spatial association. Test 27(3): 716–748.
- Brambilla M, Bergero V, Bassi E & Falco R 2015: Current and future effectiveness of Natura 2000 network in the central Alps for the conservation of mountain forest owl species in a warming climate. European Journal of Wildlife Research 61: 35–44. DOI: 10.1007%2Fs10344-014-0864-6
- Braunisch V, Roder S, Coppes J, Froidevaux JS, Arlettaz R & Bollmann K 2019: Structural complexity in managed and strictly protected mountain forests: Effects on the habitat suitability for indicator bird species. Forest Ecology and Management 448: 139–149. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.06.007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.foreco.2019.06.007</a>
- Brunet J, Fritz Ö & Richnau G 2010: Biodiversity in European beech forests-a review with recommendations for sustainable forest management. Ecological Bulletins 53: 77–94.
- Buckley P & Mills J 2015: The flora and fauna of coppice woods: winners and losers of active management or neglect?, 129–139. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
- Danko Š, Darolová A & Krištín A 2002: Birds distribution in Slovakia. VEDA, Bratislava.
- Enoksson B, Angelstam P & Larsson K 1995: Deciduous forest and resident birds: the problem of fragmentation within a coniferous forest landscape. Landscape Ecology 10: 267–275.
- Felton A, Hedwall PO, Lindbladh M, Nyberg T, Felton AM, Holmström E, Wallin I, Löf M & Brunet J 2016: The biodiversity contribution of wood plantations: Contrasting the bird communi-ties of Sweden’s protected and production oak forests. Forest Ecology and Management 365: 51–60. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.030" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.030</a>
- Fuller RJ 2012: Avian responses to transitional habitats in temperate cultural landscapes: wood-land edges and young-growth, 125–149. In: Fuller RJ (ed), Birds and Habitat. Relationships in Changing Landscapes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK.
- Galeotti P 2001: Strix aluco tawny owl. BWP Update 3(1): 43−77.
- Grantham HS, Duncan A, Evans TD, Jones KR, Beyer HL, Schuster R, Walston J, Ray JC, Robin-son JG, Callow M, Clements T, Costa HM, DeGemmis A, Elsen PR, Ervin J, Franco P, Goldman E, Goetz S, Hansen A, Hofsvang E, Jantz P, Jupiter S, Kang A, Langhammer P, Laurance WF, Lie-berman S, Linkie M, Malhi Y, Maxwell S, Mendez M, Mittermeier R, Murray NJ, Radachowsky J, Saatchi S, Samper C, Silverman J, Shapiro A, Strassburg B, Stevens T, Stokes E, Taylor R, Tear T, Tizzard R, Venter O, Visconti P, Wang S & Watson, J. E. 2020: Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nature Communications 11(1): 1–10. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19493-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1038/s41467-020-19493-3</a>
- Hakkarainen H, Korpimäki E, Koivunen V & Kurki S 1997: Boreal owl responses to forest management: a review. Journal of Raptor Research 31(2): 125–128.
- Hermy M 2015: Evolution and changes in the understorey of deciduous forests: lagging behind drivers of change, 174–192. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
- Hill AP, Prince P, Snaddon JL, Doncaster CP, Rogers A 2019: AudioMoth: A low-cost acoustic de-vice for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. HardwareX 6:e00073.
- Hinsley SA, Fuller RJ & Ferns PN 2015: The changing fortunes of woodland birds in temperate Europe, 154–173. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
- Jansson G, Angelstam P, Åberg J & Swenson JE 2004: Management targets for the conservation of hazel grouse in boreal landscapes. Ecological Bulletins 51: 259–264.
- Kirby KJ & Watkins C 2015: Overview of Europe’s woods and forests. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
- Law BE, Berner LT, Buotte PC, Mildrexler DJ & Ripple WJ 2021: Strategic Forest Reserves can protect biodiversity in the western United States and mitigate climate change. Communications Earth and Environment 254(2). DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00326-0" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1038/s43247-021-00326-0</a>
- Lešo P, Kropil R & Kajtoch Ł 2019: Effects of forest management on bird assemblages in oak-dominated stands of the Western Carpathians – Refuges for rare species. Forest Ecology and Management 453: 117620. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117620" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117620</a>
- Lõhmus A, Lõhmus P, Remm J & Vellak K 2005: Old-growth structural elements in a strict reser-ve and commercial forest landscape in Estonia. Forest Ecology and Management 216(1–3): 201–215. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.031" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.foreco.2005.05.031</a>
- Marchesi L, Sergio F & Pedrini P 2006: Implications of temporal changes in forest dynamics on density, nest-site selection, diet and productivity of Tawny Owls Strix aluco in the Alps. Bird Study 53: 310–318. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650609461447" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00063650609461447</a>
- Mestecăneanu A & Mestecăneanu F 2020: Considerations on the density, preference of habitat and ethology of the pygmy owl (Glaucidium passerinum Linnaeus, 1758) from the Făgăraş, Iezer-Păpuşa and Leaota Mountains (Southern Carpathians, Romania). Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii Şi Comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. 36(1): 109–117.
- Mikkola H 1983: Owls of Europe. T. & A.D. Poyser. Calton.
- Morales-Hidalgo D, Oswalt SN & Somanathan E 2015: Status and trends in global primary forest, protected areas, and areas designated for conservation of biodiversity from the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. Forest Ecology and Management 352: 68–77. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FORECO.2015.06.011" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/J.FORECO.2015.06.011</a>
- Müller J, Hothorn T & Pretzsch H 2007: Long-term effects of logging intensity on structures, birds, saproxylic beetles and wood-inhabiting fungi in stands of European beech Fagus sylvatica L. Forest Ecology and Management 242(2–3): 297–305. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.</a> foreco.2007.01.046
- Pačenovský S & Šotnár K 2010: Notes on the reproduction, breeding biology and ethology of the Eurasian pygmy owl (Glaucidium passerinum) in Slovakia. Slovak Raptor Journal 4: 49–81. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/v10262-012-0046-y" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/v10262-012-0046-y</a>
- Paillet Y, Bergès L, Hjältén J, Odor P, Avon C, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Bijlsma RJ, De Bruyn L, Fuhr M, Grandin U, Kanka R, Lundin L, Luque S,Magura T, Matesanz S, Mészáros I, Sebastià MT, Schmidt W, Standovár T, Tóthmérész B, Uotila A, Valladares F, Vellak K & Virtanen R 2010: Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: Meta- analysis of species richness in Europe. Conservation biology 24(1): 101–112. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01399.x.</a>
- Rumbutis S, Vaitkuvienė D, Grašytė G, Dagys M, Dementavičius D & Treinys R 2017: Adaptive habitat preferences in the Tawny Owl Strix aluco. Bird Study 64(3): 421–430. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2017.1369001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00063657.2017.1369001</a>
- Savill P 2015: High forest management and the rise of even-aged stands, 93–106. In: Kirby KJ & Watkins C (eds.), Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes, Wallingford UK.
- Schall P, Gossner MM, Heinrichs S, Fischer M, Boch S, Prati D, Jung K, Baumgartner V, Blaser S, Böhm S, Buscot F, Daniel R, Goldmann K, Kaiser K, Kahl T, Lange M, Müller J, Overmann J, Renner SC, Schulze ED, Sikorski J, Tschapka M, Türke M, Weisser WW, Wemheuer B, Wubet T & Ammer C 2018: The impact of even-aged and uneven-aged forest management on regional biodiversity of multiple taxa in European beech forests. Journal of Applied Ecology 55(1): 267–278. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12950" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/1365-2664.12950</a>
- Ševčík R, Riegert J, Šťastný K, Zárybnický J & Zárybnická M 2021: The effect of environmental variables on owl distribution in Central Europe: A case study from the Czech Republic. Ecological Informatics 64: 101375. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101375" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101375</a>
- Šotnár K, Obuch J, Pačenovský S & Jarčuška B 2020: Spatial distribution of four sympatric owl species in Carpathian montane forests. Raptor Journal 14: 1–13. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.2478/srj-2020-0002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2478/srj-2020-0002</a>
- Virkkala R, Rajasärkkä A, Väisänen RA, Vickholm M & Virolainen E 1994: The significance of protected areas for the land birds of southern Finland. Conservation Biology 8(2): 532–544.
- Voous KH 1960: Atlas of European Birds. Nelson, London
- Vrezec A & Tome D 2004: Altitudinal segregation between Ural Owl Strix uralensis and Tawny Owl S. aluco: evidence for competitive exclusion in raptorial birds. Bird Study 51(3): 264–269. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650409461362" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/00063650409461362</a>
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 56
Submitted on: May 14, 2023
Accepted on: Jul 30, 2023
Published on: Aug 17, 2023
Published by: Raptor Protection of Slovakia
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Vladimír Nemček, Barbara Kohl, published by Raptor Protection of Slovakia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.