Size of home range of Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus) males during breeding season assessed by radio-telemetry in the Jizera Mountains, Czechia
By:
References
- Adams ES 2001: Approaches to the study of territory size and shape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32: 277–303. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114034.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114034
- Allen TFH & Starr TB 1982: Hierarchy: perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Andersson M 1981: On optimal predator search. Theoretical Population Biology 19: 58–86.
- Belmonte LR 2005: Home range and habitat characteristics of boreal owls in northeastern Minnesota. St. Pauli, University of Minnesota.
- Bondrup-Nielsen S 1978: Vocalizations, nesting, and habitat preferences of the boreal owl, (Aegolius funereus), in North America. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
- Börger L, Franconi N, De Michele G, Gantz A, Meschi F, Manica A, Lovari S & Coulson TIM 2006: Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75: 1393–1405. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01164.x.10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01164.x
- Burt WH 1943: Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 24: 346–352.
- Bye FN, Jacobsen BV & Sonerud GA 1992: Auditory prey location in a pause-travel predator – search height, search time, and attack range of Tengmalm’s owls (Aegolius funereus). Behavioral Ecology 3: 266–276.
- Cramp S 1985: The birds of the western Palaearctic, Vol. IV. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Bondrup-Nielsen S 1978: Vocalizations, nesting, and habitat preferences of the boreal owl, (Aegolius funereus), in North America. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
- Cushman SA, Chase M & Griffin C 2005: Elephants in space and time. Oikos 109: 331–341.
- Darwin C 1861: On the origin of species by means of natural selection. Murray, London.
- De Solla SR, Bonduriansky R & Brooks RJ 1999: Eliminating autocorrelation reduces biological relevance of home range estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 221–234.
- Eldegard K & Sonerud GA 2009: Female offspring desertion and male-only care increase with natural and experimental increase in food abundance. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 276: 1713–1721. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1775.10.1098/rspb.2008.1775
- Eldegard K & Sonerud GA 2010: Experimental increase in food supply influences the outcome of withinfamily conflicts in Tengmalm’s owl. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64: 815–826. DOI: 10.1007/s00265-009-0898-z.10.1007/s00265-009-0898-z
- Eldegard K & Sonerud GA 2012: Sex roles during postfledging care in birds: female Tengmalm’s owls contribute little to food provisioning. Journal of Ornithology 53: 385–398. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-011-0753-7.10.1007/s10336-011-0753-7
- Hakkarainen H, Mykra S, Kurki S, Korpimäki E, Nikula A & Koivunen V 2003: Habitat composition as a determinant of reproductive success of Tengmalm’s owls under fluctuating food conditions. Oikos 100: 162–171. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11 906.x.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.11906.x
- Hansteen TL, Andreassen HP & Ims RA 1997: Effects of spatiotemporal scale on autocorrelation and home range estimators. Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 280–290.
- Harris S, Cresswell WJ, Forde PG, Trewhella WJ, Woollard T & Wray S 1990: Home-range analysis using radio-tracking data: A review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals. Mammal Review 20: 97–1 23.
- Hayne DW 1949: Calculation of size of home range. Journal of Mammalogy 30: 1–18.
- Hurlbert SH 1984: Pseudoreplication and the design of cological field experiments. Ecological Monographs 54: 187–211.
- Jacobsen BV & Sonerud GA 1987: Home range of Tengmalm’s owl: A comparison between nocturnal hunting and diurnal roosting. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM 142: 189–192.
- Kenward RE 2001: A manual for wildlife radio tagging. Academic Press, London.
- König C & Weick F 2008: Owls of the world. Second edition. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.
- Korpimäki E 1981: On the ecology and biology of Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus) in southern Ostrobothnia and Soumenselkä, western Finland. Acta University Oulu A 118 Biology 13: 1–84.
- Korpimäki E & Hakkarainen H 2012: The boreal owl: ecology, behaviour and conservation of a forest dwelling predator. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
- Kouba M, Bartoš L & Šťastný K 2013: Differential movement patterns of juvenile Tengmalm’s owls (Aegolius funereus) during the post-fledging dependence period in two years with contrasting prey abundance. PLoS One 8(7): e67034. DOI: 67010.61371/journal.pone.0067034.
- Kouba M, Bartoš L, Korpimäki E & Zárybnická M 2015: Factors affecting the duration of nestling period and fledging order in Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus): Effect of wing length and hatching sequence. PLoS One 10(3): e0121641. DOI:121610.0121371/journal.pone.0121641.
- Kouba M, Bartoš L, Tomášek V, Popelková A, Šťastný K & Zárybnická M 2017: Home range size of Tengmalm’s owl during breeding in Central Europe is determined by prey abundance. PLoS One 12(5): e0177314. DOI: 0177310.0171371/journal.pone.0177314.
- Lane WH 1997: Distribution and ecology of boreal owls in northeast Minnesota. University ofMinnesota, St. Paul.
- Laver PN & Kelly MJ 2008: A critical review of home range studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 72: 290–298. DOI: 10.2193/2005-589.10.2193/2005-589
- Mace GM & Harvey PH 1983: Energetic constraints on home-range size. American Naturalist 121: 120–132.
- McLoughlin PD & Ferguson SH 2000: A hierarchical pattern of limiting factors helps explain variation in home range size. Ecoscience 7: 123–130.
- Mikkola H 1983: Owls of Europe. Poyser, Calton.
- Mohr CO 1947: Table of equivalent populations of north american small mammals. American Midland Naturalist 37: 223–249.
- Newton I 1986: The Sparrowhawk. Calton, Poyser.
- Norberg RA 1970: Hunting technique of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus. Ornis Scandinavica 1: 51–64.
- Palmer DA 1986: Habitat selection, movements and activity of boreal and saw-whet owls. Colorado State University, Fort Collins.
- Pfeiffer T & Meyburg BU 2015: GPS tracking of red kites (Milvus milvus) reveals fledgling number is negatively correlated with home range size. Journal of Ornithology 156: 963–975. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-015-1230-5.10.1007/s10336-015-1230-5
- Powell RA 2000: Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators, 65–110. In: Boitani L & Fuller T (eds), Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. Columbia University Press, New York.
- Rodgers AR & Kie JG 2011: HRT: Home range tools for ArcGIS, A user’s manual. Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Ontario.
- Rodgers AR, Carr AP, Beyer HL, Smith L & Kie JG 2007: HRT: Home tange tools for ArcGIS. Version 1.1. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Centre for Northern Forest Ecosystem Research, Thunder Bay, Ontario.
- Santangeli A, Hakkarainen H, Laaksonen T & Korpimäki E 2012: Home range size is determined by habitat composition but feeding rate by food availability in male Tengmalm’s owls. Animal Behaviour 83: 1115–1123. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.02.002.10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.02.002
- Seaman DE, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ, Brundige GC, Raedeke KJ & Gitzen RA 1999: Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. Journal of Wildlife Management 63: 739–747.
- Seaman DE & Powell RA 1996: An evaluation of the accuracy of kernel density estimators for home range analysis. Ecology 77: 2075–2085.
- Silverman BW 1986: Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. Chapman and Hall, London.
- Sonerud GA, Solheim R & Jacobsen BV 1986: Homerange use and habitat selection during hunting in a male Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus. Fauna norvegica Series C, Cinclus 9: 100–106.
- Sorbi S 2003: Size and use of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus home range in the high Belgian Ardennes: Results from radio-tracking. Alauda 71: 215–220. (In French with English summary)
- White GC & Garrott RA 1990: Analysis of wildlife radio-tracking data. Academic Press, San Diego.
- Withey JC, Bloxton TD & Marzluff JM 2001: Effects of tagging and location error in wildlife radiotelemetry studies, 43–70. In: Millspaugh JJ & Marzluff JM (eds), Radio tracking and animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego.
- Worton BJ 1989: Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70: 164–168.
- Zabel CJ, McKelvey K & Ward JP 1995: Influence of primary prey on home-range size and habitat-use patterns of northern spotted owls (Strix occidentalis caurina). Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 73: 433–439.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 7
Submitted on: Sep 18, 2018
Accepted on: Nov 29, 2018
Published on: Mar 2, 2019
Published by: Raptor Protection of Slovakia
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2019 Marek Kouba, Václav Tomášek, published by Raptor Protection of Slovakia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.