References
- Aristotle (2009). Prior Analytics Book I. Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by Gisela Striker. Clarendon Aristotle Series. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Austin, J. (1962). How to do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
- Bermejo Luque, L. (2011a). Giving reasons: A linguistic-pragmatic approach to argumentation theory Argumentation Library (Vol. 20). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
- Bermejo Luque, L. (2011b). Exchanging Reasons: responses to critics. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, vol. 26, 72: 329–343.
- Bermejo Luque, L. (2019). The Appraisal of Conductions. Informal Logic 39 (2): 123–145.
- Biro, J. & Siegel, H. (2011). Argumentation, Arguing, and Arguments: Comments on Giving Reasons. Theoria, vol. 26, 72: 279–287.
- Blair, J.A. & Johnson, R. (2000). Informal Logic: An Overview. Informal Logic, 20 (2): 93–107.
- Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness: same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11 (2): 131–146.
- Boethius, A. (1978). De Topicis Differentiis. Translated, with notes and essays on the text, by Eleonore Stump. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
- Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,.
- Dufour, M. (2017). Argument or Explanation: Who Is to Decide? Informal Logic, 37(1), 23–41.
- Govier, T. (2010). A Practical Study of Argument. 7th edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
- Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
- Hinton, M. (2020). Towards a Theory of Informal Argument Semantics. In: Dutilh Novaes, C., Jansen, H., van Laar, J.A., & Verheij, B. (eds.). Reason to Dissent – Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Argumentation, Volume II, 279–392. London: College Publications.
- Hinton M. (2021). Evaluating the Language of Argument. Argumentation Library Vol. 37. Cham: Springer.
- Hinton, M., Kobierski, M, Olkowska, W. & A. Sroka. (forthcoming). Functions of Argument: Changing minds about what? Proceedings of the 13th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA).
- Hitchcock, D. (2011). Arguing as Trying to Show That a Target-claim is Correct. Theoria, vol. 26, 72: 301–309.
- Johnson, R.H., & Blair, J.A. (2006). Logical Self-defense. New York: Idebate Press. Locke, J. ([1690] 1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lumer, C. (2010). Pragma-dialectics and the function of argumentation. Argumentation, 24(1), 41–69.
- Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2017). The Enigma of Reason. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
- Popa, E. (2021). Farewell to Fallacies (and Welcome Back!). Philosophy and Rhetoric, Vol. 54, No. 4, 397–420.
- Siegel, H., & Biro, J. (2008). Rationality, reasonableness, and critical rationalism: Problems with the pragma-dialectical view. Argumentation, 22(2), 191–203.
- Terkourafi, M. (2015). Conventionalization: A new agenda for im/politeness research. Journal of Pragmatics, 86: 11–18.
- van Eemeren, F. H., & Grootendorst, R. (1995). The pragma-dialectical approach to fallacies. In Hansen, H.V., and Pinto, R.C. (Eds.) Fallacies: Classical and Contemporary Readings, 130–144. University Park: Penn State University Press.
- van Eemeren, F.H., & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wagemans, J.H.M. (2016). Constructing a Periodic Table of Arguments. OSSA conference archive. 106 https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA11/papersandcommentaries/106/
- Wagemans, J.H.M. (2021). Argument Type Identification Procedure (ATIP) – Version 4. Published online December 30, 2021. www.periodic-table-of-arguments.org/argument-type-identification-procedure
- Wagemans, J.H.M. (2023). On the hermeneutics of persuasive discourse: How to identify an argument type? Journal of Pragmatics, 203, 117–129.
- Wakley, T. (1855). “Editorial.” Lancet 65: 634–37.
- Walton, D. (1988). Burden of Proof. Argumentation, 2, 233–254.
- Walton, D. (2004). Classification of Fallacies of Relevance. Informal Logic, 24(1), 71–103.
- Walton, D. (2015). The Basic Slippery Slope Argument. Informal Logic, 35(3), 273–311.
- Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (1986). Inference and Implicature in Utterance Interpretation. In T. Myers, K. Brown, & B. McGonigle (Eds.), Reasoning and Discourse Processes (pp. 241–263). London: Academic Press.
- Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory. In L. Horn & G. Ward (Eds.). Handbook of Pragmatics (pp. 607–632). Oxford: Blackwell.