Questioning the Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology
References
- Aleksander, I. 2022. “From Turing to Conscious Machines” Philosophies 7, no. 3: 57. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies7030057.
- Aleksander, I. 2020. The category of machines that become conscious, J. Artif. Intell. Conscious. 7(1), 313.
- Aleksander, I., and Morton, H. 2007. Why axiomatic models of being conscious? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 15–27.
- Arabales, R., A. Redezma, and A. Sanchis. 2009. Establishing a roadmap and metric for conscious machine development. Published in: Proceedings of the 8th IEEE International Confenrence on Cognitive Informatics, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 15–17 June 2009, pp. 94–101. https://e-archivo.uc3m.es/bitstream/handle/10016/10430/establishing arrabales ICCI 2009 ps.pdf;jsessionid=CFD777964ED614DF35B3E605F4C9F9DE?sequence=2.
- Audi, R. 2015. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. 3rded. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bain, D., M. Brady and J. Corns. 2020. Philosophy of Suffering. Metaphysics, Value, and Normativity. London: Routledge.
- Bartoletti, I. 2021. An Artificial Revolution. London: The Indigo Press.
- Basl, J. 2013. The Ethics of Creating Artificial Consciousness. APA Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers 13 (1):23–29.
- Becker, A. 2019. What is Real? London: John Murray (Publishers).
- Bennet, M., D. Dennett, P. Hacker, and J. Searle. 2007. Neuroscience and Philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Blackburn, S. 1994. The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford University Press. p. 58.
- Bostrom, N. 2012. The superintelligent will: Motivation and instrumental rationality in advanced artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 22(2 – special issue ‘Philosophy of AI’ ed. Vincent C. Mü ller), 71–85.
- Brandon, C. 2023. Epistemic Modality. IEP. Available at https://iep.utm.edu/ep-moda/.
- Bulter, S. 2019. Why Medieval philosophy matters? London: Bloomsbury Publishers.
- Cali, C. 2022. Philosophical, Experimental and Synthetic Phenomenology: The Study of Perception for Biological, Artificial Agents and Environments. Foundations of science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-022-09869-7
- Chalmers, D. 2017. Artificial Consciousness – David Chalmers. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlAIuv31YKs.
- Chalmers, D. 2023. SuperIntelligence. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPQJUP52V4A
- Chrisley, R. 2009. Synthetic Phenomenology. International Journal of Machine Consciousness 2009 01:01, 53–70. DOI: 10.1142/S1793843009000074.
- Chrisley, R., & Parthemore, J. 2007. Synthetic phenomenology: Exploiting embodiment to specify the nonconceptual content of visual experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14, 44–58.
- Davies, J. 2012. The Importance of Suffering: the value and meaning of emotional discontent. London: Routledge ISBN 0-415-66780-1
- Defense. 2002. “Defense.gov News Transcript: DoD News Briefing – Secretary Rumsfeld and Gen. Myers, United States Department of Defense (defense.gov)”. February 12, 2002. Available at https://archive.ph/20180320091111/http://archive.defense.gov/Transcripts/Transcript.aspx?TranscriptID=2636.
- Dennett, D. 1991. Consciousness explained. Boston: Back Bay Books.
- Dennett, D. 2018. From Bacteria to Bach. London: Penguin.
- DeRose, K. 1991. Epistemic Possibilities. The Philosophical Review, 100(4), 581–605. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185175
- Dreyfus, H. L., and S. E. Dreyfus. 1988, Making a mind versus modelling the brain. In Drefyus, H. L. Skillful Coping. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 205–230.
- Floridi L. and J.W. Sanders. 2004. On the Morality of Artificial Agents. Minds and Machines 14: 349–379.
- Frances, B. 2021. The Problem of Suffering. In: An Agnostic Defends God. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73331-5_6.
- Fodor, J. and M. Pitattelli-Marini. 2010. What Darwin got wrong. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
- Gamez, D. 2008. Progress in machine consciousness, Consciousness and Cognition, Volume 17, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 887–910, ISSN 1053–8100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.04.005.
- Gawdat, M. 2013. Don’t bring children into this AI world. EMERGENCY EPISODE: Ex-Google Officer Finally Speaks Out On The Dangers Of AI! – Mo Gawdat. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bk-nQ7HF6k4
- Godfrey-Smith, P. 2018. Other Minds. London: Harper Collins.
- Gupta, V. 2020. The Future Stuff. London: Unbound.
- Hinton, G. 2023. Statement on AI Risk. Open Letter. Available at https://www.safe.ai/statement-on-ai-risk#open-letter.
- Honderich, T. 2005. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. 2nded. Oxford; Oxford University Press.
- Hopkins, P. D. 2012. Why uploading will not work, or, the ghosts haunting transhumanism. International Journal of Machine Consciousness. Vol. 4, No. 1 (2012) 1250014.
- Humphrey, N. 2012. Soul Dust. The Magic of Consciousness. London: Quercus.
- Klein, N. 2023. AI machines aren’t ‘hallucinating’. But their makers are. The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/may/08/ai-machines-hallucinating-naomi-klein.
- Kleiner, J. 2020. “Mathematical Models of Consciousness” Entropy 22, no. 6: 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22060609
- Koene, R.A. 2012. “Fundamentals of Whole Brain Emulation: State, Transition and Update Representations”. International Journal on Machine Consciousness Vol. 4, No. 1 (2012). pp 5–21.
- Koene, R.A. 2013. Uploading to Substrate-Independent Minds. The Transhumanist Reader: Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future, First Edition. Edited by Max More and Natasha Vita-More. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 146–156.
- Kroes P. and P-P., Verbeek. 2010. Introduction: The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. In Kroes P. and P-P., Verbeek (eds.). 2010. The Moral Status of Technical Artefacts. Berlin: Springer. Pp. 1–11.
- Krzanowski, R. and P. Polak. 2023. Philosophy in Technology: Objectives, Questions, Methods, and Issues. Workshop on Philosophy in Technology: The Philosophical Challenges for Technology from Various Points of View, April 28–29, 2023. Wrocław University of Science and Technology. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/370653723_Philosophy_in_Technology_Objectives_Questions_Methods_and_Issues.
- Langle, A. 2008. Suffering – an Existential Challenge: Understanding, dealing and coping with suffering from an existential-analytic perspective. International Journal of Existential Psychology & Psychotherapy. Volume 2, Issue 1. Available at https://www.meaning.ca/web/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/115-13-486-1-10-20171212.pdf.
- Lem, S. 2014/1965. The Cyberiad. London: Penguin Books.
- Lewis, C.S. 2001/1940.The Problem of Pain. San Francisco: Harper.
- Magidor, O. 2016. Category Mistakes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Magidor, O. 2022. “Category Mistakes”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.), URL = https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2022/entries/category-mistakes/.
- Marcus, G. 2022. Artificial General Intelligence Is Not as Imminent as You Might Think. Scientific American. Available at https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/artificial-general-intelligence-is-not-as-imminent-as-you-might-think1/.
- McCarthy, J. 1959. “Programs with Common Sense” at the Wayback Machine (archived October 4, 2013). In Proceedings of the Teddington Conference on the Mechanization of Thought Processes, 756–91. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.
- Metzinger T. 2008. Empirical perspectives from the self-model theory of subjectivity: a brief summary with examples. Prog Brain Res. 2008;168:215–45. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)68018-2. PMID: 18166398.
- Metzinger T. 2003. Being No One. The Self-Model Theory of Sub jectivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Metzinger T. 2007. Self models. Scholarpedia, 2(10):4174. Available at http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Self_models.
- Metzinger T. 2017. Suffering.In Kurt Almqvist & Anders Haag (2017) [eds.], The Return of Consciousness. Stockholm: Axel and Margaret Ax:son Johnson Foundation. ISBN 978-91-89672-90-1
- Metzinger, T. 2021. Why we should worry about computer suffering. IAI News./articles/why-we-should-worry-about-computer-suffering-auid-1761.
- Metzinger, T. 2021a. Artificial Suffering: An Argument for a Global Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology. (Philosophisches Seminar, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, D-55099 Mainz, Germany) Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Consciousness 2021 08:01, 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1142/S270507852150003X.
- Metzinger, T. 2021b. Three Types Of Arguments for a Global Moratorium on Synthetic Phenomenology. Pufendorf lecture at the Department of Philosophy, Lund University, 21 October 2021. Available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RzhpmAlMURQ.
- Mickunas, A. and J. Pilott. 2023. A Critical Understanding of Artificial Intelligence: A Phenomenological Foundation. Singapore: Bentham Science Publishers Pte. Ltd.
- Mlsbt. 2021. The problem of artificial suffering. Effective Altruism Forum. Available at https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/JCBPexSaGCfLtq3DP/the-problem-of-artificial-suffering
- Müller, V. C., & Cannon, M. 2022. Existential risk from AI and orthogonality: Can we have it both ways? Ratio, 35, 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12320.
- Powers, T. M., and Jean-Gabriel Ganascia, ‘The Ethics of the Ethics of AI’, in Markus D. Dubber, Frank Pasquale, and Sunit Das (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (2020; online edn, Oxford Academic, 9 July 2020), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.2, accessed 13 May 2023.
- Russell, S. 2019. Human Compatible. AI and problems of control. London: Penguin.
- Ryle, G. 1942. The Concept of mind. Routledge edition (2009). New York: Routledge.
- Sager, A. R. 2021. “The Existential Problem of Evil: Theodicy, Theosis, and the Threat of Meaninglessness” (2021). ETD Collection for Fordham University. AAI28496133. Available at https://research.library.fordham.edu/dissertations/AAI28496133
- Sandberg, A. 2013. Feasibility of Whole Brain Emulation. Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence, 251–264. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_19.
- Sandberg, A. and N. Bostrom. 2008. Whole Brain Emulation: A Roadmap, Technical Report #2008-3, Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford University. Available at www.fhi.ox.ac.uk/reports/2008-3.pdf.
- Schneider, S. 2020. How to Catch an AI Zombie In: Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. Edited by: S. Matthew Liao, Oxford University Press (2020). © Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780190905040.003.0016
- Searle, J. R. 1984. Minds Brains, and Science, Penguin, London.
- Searle, J. R. 1990. ‘Is The Brain A Digital Computer?’, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 64(3), 21–37.
- Shevlin, H. 2019. To build conscious machines, focus on general intelligence: A framework for the assessment of consciousness in biological and artificial systems, in Proc. Towards Conscious AI Systems Symposium, CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 2287, Paper 10 (Palo Alto, CA), 8 pages.
- Smith D.H. and G. Schillaci. 2021. Why Build a Robot With Artificial Consciousness? How to Begin? A Cross-Disciplinary Dialogue on the Design and Implementation of a Synthetic Model of Consciousness. Front. Psychol. 12:530560. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.530560
- Sotala, K., and L. Gloor. 2017. Superintelligence as a Cause or Cure for Risks of Astronomical Suffering. Informatica 41 (2017) 389–400_389.
- Stevenson, A. (ed.). 2010. Oxford Dictionary of English, third edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Suffering n.d. What did the Buddha mean by suffering? Available at https://tricycle.org/beginners/buddhism/what-did-the-buddha-mean-by-suffering/
- Tomasik, B. 2019. What are suffering subroutines? Avaiable at https://reducing-suffering.org/what-are-suffering-subroutines/
- Veliz, C. 2021. Moral zombies: why algorithms are not moral agents. AI & Society (2021) 36:487–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01189-x
- Wasson, D. 2018. Roman Daily Life. Available at https://www.worldhistory.org/article/637/roman-daily-life/
- Woodridge, A. 2020. The Road to Conscious Machines. London: Penguin.
- Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power (Campus, 2018; PublicAffairs, 2019).
Language: English
Page range: 335 - 352
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2024 Roman Krzanowski, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.