References
- Barczewska, S. (2017). Conceptualizing Evolution Education: A Corpus-Based Analysis of US Press Discourse. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Barczewska, S. (2018). “Now, correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems to me that […]”: First person singular pronouns as markers of (inter)subjectivity. Prace Językoznawcze, Tom 20, (1), 11–28.
- Benveniste, É. (1971). Problems in general linguistics [Problemes de linguistique generale]. Miami linguistics series: no. 8. Coral Gables, Fla.: University of Miami Press.
- Bucholtz, M. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407
- De Cock, B. (2016). The referential ambiguity of personal pronouns and its pragmatic consequences. Pragmatics, 26(3), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.26.3.02dec
- Fixed Point Foundation (2008). Richard Dawkins vs John Lennox: Has Science Buried God? Debate [Online]. Oxford University Museum of Natural History: Fixed Point Foundation: Fixed Point Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVEuQg Mglw
- Fortanet, I. (2004). The use of ‘we’ in university lectures: Reference and function. English for Specific Purposes, 23(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(03)00018-8
- Górska, A. (2016, May 29). “I Find That Unconvincing”: Frames of Self- and Other-Presentation in the Debate Has Science Buried God? University of Wrocław. Languages in Contact,
- Harwood, N. (2005). ‘We Do Not Seem to Have a Theory … The Theory I Present Here Attempts to Fill This Gap’: Inclusive and Exclusive Pronouns in Academic Writing. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 343–375. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami012
- Harwood, N. (2007). Political scientists on the functions of personal pronouns in their writing: An interview-based study of ‘I’ and ‘we’. Text & Talk, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.002
- Helmbrecht, J. (2002). Grammar and function of we. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Pragmatics & beyond new series (P&BNS): Vol. 98. Us and Others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures (pp. 31–49). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
- Helmbrecht, J. (2015). A typology of non-prototypical uses of personal pronouns: Synchrony and diachrony. Journal of Pragmatics, 88, 176–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.10.004
- Hyland, K. (2007). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 20, 207–226.
- Jakobson, R. (1973). Questions de poétique. Collection Poétique. Éditions du Seuil.
- The jamovi project (2022). jamovi (Version 2.3) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org.
- Langacker, R. W. (1999). Virtual Reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29(2), 77–103.
- Langacker, R. W. (2006). Subjectification, grammaticization, and conceptual archetypes. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity (pp. 17–40). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Langacker, R. W. (2007). Constructing the meanings of personal pronouns. In G. Radden (Ed.), Aspects of meaning construction (pp. 171–187). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
- Marcus, A. (2008). We are you: The plural and the dual in “we” fictional narratives. Journal of Literary Semantics, 37(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.2008.001
- Nathan, M. J., Eilam, B., & Kim, S. (2007). To Disagree, We Must Also Agree: How Intersubjectivity Structures and Perpetuates Discourse in a Mathematics Classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 523–563.
- Nuyts, J. (2001). Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualization: A cognitivepragmatic perspective. Human cognitive processing: vol. 5. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
- Pennycook, A. (1994). The Politics of Pronouns, 48, 173–178.
- Petersoo, P. (2004). What does ‘we’ mean? National deixis in the media. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(3), 419–436.
- Proctor, K., & Su, L. I.-W. (2011). The 1st person plural in political discourse – American politicians in interviews and in a debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3251–3266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.06.010
- R Core Team (2021). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org.
- Scheibman, J. (2004). Inclusive and Exclusive Patterning of the English First Person Plural: Evidence from Conversation. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, Culture, and Mind (pp. 377–395). CSLI Publications. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=E9B4F3035C0DFEC2FD2F273D76CA4705?doi=10.1.1.489.5456&rep=rep1&type=pdf
- Schutz, A. (1932). Der sinnhafte aufbau der sozialen welt: Eine einleitung in die verstehende soziologie. Vienna, Austria: Springer.
- Sears, D. O., Freedman, J. L., & O’Connor, J. E. F. (1964). The Effects of Anticipated Debate and Commitment on the Polarization of Audience Opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 28(4), 615. https://doi.org/10.1086/267285
- Social Science Statistics (2024). Z Score Calculator for 2 Population Proportions [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/ztest/default2.aspx
- Stahl, G. (2016). From Intersubjectivity to Group Cognition. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 25(4–5//4–5), 355–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-016-9243-z
- Traugott, E. (1995). Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives (pp. 31–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Traugott, E. (2010). (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In H. Cuyckens, K. Davidse, & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Topics in English Linguistics. Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization (Vol. 66, pp. 29–74). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
- Traugott, E. C. (2003). From subjectification to intersubjectification. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Motives for Language Change (pp. 124–139). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486937.009
- Verhagen, A. (2006). On subjectivity and ‘long distance Wh-movement’. In A. Athanasiadou, C. Canakis, & B. Cornillie (Eds.), Subjectification: Various Paths to Subjectivity (pp. 323–346). Mouton de Gruyter.
- Verhagen, A. (2008). Intersubjectivity and the architecture of the language system. In J. Zlatev (Ed.), Converging evidence in language and communication research: v. 12. The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (pp. 307– 331). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Verhagen, A. (2010). Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Wales, K. (1996). Personal pronouns in present-day English. Studies in English language series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Whitt, R. J. (2011). (Inter)Subjectivity and evidential perception verbs in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.015
- Whitt, R. J. (2014). Singular perception, multiple perspectives through we: constructing intersubjective meaning in English and German: constructing intersubjective meaning in English and German. In T. Pavlidou (Ed.), Pragmatics et beyond new series: Vol. 239. Constructing collectivity: “we” across languages and contexts. Amsterdam: Benjamins.