This paper shows that Wittgenstein’s situational approach applied to Hume’s is-ought problem leads to the conclusion that this famous Hume thesis is false both in its original version (lack of logical value of deontic sentences) and in its modern understanding (logical separation of deontic sentences and sentences about facts).
© 2024 Andrzej Malec, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.