References
- Andrén, M. 2010. Children’s Gestures between 18 and 30 Months. Lund: Media Tryck.
- Cole, J. (1995). Pride and a Daily Marathon. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
- Gallagher, S. & Cole, J. (1995). Body schema and body image in a deafferented subject. Journal of Mind and Behavior 16, 369–390.
- Gallagher, S., & Zahavi, D. (2012). The Phenomenological Mind. An Introduction to Philosophy of Mind and Cognitive Science. Second edition. Milton Park: Routledge.
- Giorgi, A. (2010). Phenomenology and the practice of science. Existential Analysis, 21(1), 3–22.
- Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Widening the lens: what the manual modality reveals about language, learning and cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B369: 20130295. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0295
- Goldin-Meadow, S., & Brentari, D. (2017). Gesture, sign, and language: the coming of age of sign language and gesture studies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–17. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X15001247
- Gullberg, M. (2010). Methodological reflections on gesture analysis in SLA and bilingualism research. Second Language Research, 26(1), 76–102. DOI: 10.1177/0267658309337639
- Kendon, A. (1980). Gesture and speech: two aspects of the process of utterance. In: M. R. Key (ed.), Nonverbal Communication and Language (pp. 207–227). The Hague: Mouton.
- Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kendon, A. (2014). Semiotic diversity in utterance production and the concept of ‘language’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. B 369:20130293. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0293
- Kita, S. & Emmorey, K. (2023). Gesture links language and cognition for spoken and signed languages. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2, 407–420. DOI: 10.1038/s44159-023-00186-9
- Konderak, P. (2018). Mind, Cognition, Semiosis. Ways to Cognitive Semiotics. Lublin: UMCS Press.
- Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 102–120. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp062oa
- Louhema, K., Zlatev, J., Graziano, M., & Weijer, J.v.d. (2019). Translating from monosemiotic to polysemiotic narratives: A study of Finnish speech and gestures. Sign Systems Studies, 47(3/4), 480–525. 10.12697/SSS.2019.47.3-4.07
- McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Mendoza-Collazos, J. (2022). Agency and Artefacts: A cognitive semiotic exploration of design (1 ed.). [Doctoral Thesis (compilation), Centre for Languages and Literature]. Lund University.
- Mendoza-Collazos, J., & Zlatev, J. (2022). A Cognitive-Semiotic Approach to Agency: Assessing Ideas from Cognitive Science and Neuroscience. Biosemiotics 15, 141–170.
- Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception, trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge.
- Mittelberg, I. (2013). The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In: Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S.H., McNeill, D. & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication (pp. 755–784). De Gruyter-Mouton.
- Müller, C. (2018). Gesture and Sign: Cataclysmic Break or Dynamic Relations? Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1651.
- Nagel, T. (1974). What it is like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.
- Quaeghebeur, L., Duncan, S., Gallagher, S., Cole, J. & McNeill, D. (2014). Aproprioception, gesture, and cognitive being. In: Müller, C., Cienki, A., Fricke, E., Ladewig, S.H., McNeill, D. & Teßendorf, S. (Eds.), Body – Language – Communication (pp. 2048–2061). De Gruyter-Mouton.
- Rowlands, M. (2010). The New Science of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. SAGE.
- Sonesson, G. (2006). The meaning of meaning in biology and cognitive science. Sign Systems Studies, 34(1), 135–214.
- Sonesson, G. (2022). Cognitive Science and Semiotics. In: Pelkey, J. (Ed.), Bloomsbury semiotics Volume 4: Semiotic movements (pp. 293–312). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
- Stampoulidis, G., Bolognesi, M., Zlatev, J. (2019). A cognitive semiotic exploration of metaphors in Greek street art. Cognitive Semiotics 12(1), 20192008. 10.1515/cogsem-2019-2008
- Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. London: Belknap Press.
- Zahavi, D. (2019). Phenomenology. The basics. Routledge.
- Zlatev, J. (2015). Cognitive semiotics. In P. Trifonas (Ed.), International handbook of semiotics (pp. 1043–1067). Springer: Dordrecht.
- Zlatev, J. (2023). The intertwining of bodily experience and language: The continued relevance of Merleau-Ponty. Histoire Epistémologie Langage 45(1), 41–63.
- Zlatev, J., Blomberg, J., & David, C. (2010). Translocation, language and the categorization of experience. In V. Evans (Ed.), Language, cognition, and space: the state of the art and new directions (pp. 389–418). Equinox Publishing.
- Zlatev, J. & Andrén, M. (2009) Stages and transitions in children’s semiotic development. In: Zlatev, J., Andrén, M., Lundmark, C. & Johansson Falck, M. (Eds.) Studies in Language and Cognition, 380–401. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
- Zlatev, J., Żywiczynski, P. & Wacewicz, S. (2020). Pantomime as the Original Human-specific Communicative System. Journal of Language Evolution, 1–19.