References
- Bierwiaczonek, B. (2011). Panta rei – on aquatic and marine concepts and words in English. Annales. Annals for Istrian and Mediterranean Studies. Series Historia et Sociologia, 21, 1, 31–42. Koper: Univerzitetna Založba Annales.
- Bierwiaczonek, B. (2013). Metonymy in Language, Thought and Brain. Sheffield: Equinox.
- Bierwiaczonek, B. (2020). Figures of speech revisited: introducing syntonymy and syntaphor. In Baicchi, A. (ed.) Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language, 225–251. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.
- Bierwiaczonek B. (2021). Prototype semantics: syntaphor in polysemy and beyond. Studia Neofilologiczne XVII. Język figuratywny. 11–29.
- Bierwiaczonek B. (2022). On figuration of gender in English. Linguistica Silesiana, vol. 43, 341–371. DOI: 10.24425/linsi.2022.141231; ISSN 0208-4228
- Clausner, T. and W. Croft. (1999). Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10–1, pp. 1–32.
- Croft, W. (2006 [1993]). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. In D. Geeraerts (Ed.). Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, 269–302. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Cruse, A. (2000). Meaning in Language. An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dancygier, B. & Sweetser, E. (2014). Figurative Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Evans, V. and M. Green (2006). Cognitive Linguistics. An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.
- Evans, V. (2019). Cognitive Linguistics. A Complete Guide. Edinburgh University Press.
- Geeraerts, D. (2010). Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gibbs, R. and H.L. Colston (2012). Interpreting Figurative Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Glucksberg, S. (2008). How Metaphors Create Categories – Quickly. In Gibbs, R. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 67–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Glucksberg, S and B. Keysar (1993). How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought. Second Edition, 401–424. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Goatly, A. (1997). The Language of Metaphors. London and New York: Routledge.
- Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.
- Grady, J. (2007). Metaphor. In Geeraerts, D. and H. Cuyckens (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, 188–213. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hanks, P. (2006). Metaphoricity is gradable. In A. Stefanowitsch and S. Gries (eds.) Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy, 17–35. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive linguistics, 1–27. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI 10.1515/cog-2016-0052.
- Kövecses, Z. (2020). A multilevel view of metaphor and some of its advantages. In Baicchi, A. (ed.) Figurative Meaning Construction in Thought and Language, 71–88. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.
- Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor, in Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought, 2nd Edition, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lakoff G. and M. Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lakoff G. and M. Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
- Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Langacker, R. (2002 [1990]). Concept, Image, and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Nerlich, B. (2010). Synecdoche: A trope, a whole trope, and nothing but a trope? In A. Burkhardt, & B. Nerlich (Eds.) Tropical Truth(s) The Epistemology of Metaphor and other Tropes, 297–319. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.
- Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In B. Lloyd and E. Rosch (eds.) Cognition and Categorization, 27–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Rosch, E., C. Mervis, W. Grey, D. Johnson, and P. Boyes-Braem (1976). Basic objects in natural categories, Cognitive Psychology 8, 382–439.
- Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáañez, F. & Galera Masegosa, A. (2014). Cognitive Modeling. A linguistic perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Seto, K. (1999). Distinguishing Metonymy from Synecdoche. In K. Panther & G. Radden (Eds.) Metonymy in Language and Thought, 91–120. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Seto, K. (2003). Metonymic polysemy and its place in meaning extension. In B. Nerlich, Z. Todd, V. Herman & D. Clarke (Eds.) Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language, 195–214. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin.
- Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and Constructions in Metaphoric Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Szwedek, A. (2011). The ultimate source domain, Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9:2, 341–366.
- Taylor, J. (1995). Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Second, revised edition).
- Taylor, J. (2006). Polysemy and the lexicon. In G. Kristiansen, M. Archard, R. Dirven, F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáañez (eds). Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives, 51–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
- Ungerer, F., Schmid, H. (2006). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Pearson Longman. (Third, revised edition).
- Wittgenstein, L. (2009 [1953]). Philosophical Investigations. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.