Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Cognition, Relevance and Ideology Formation through Travel Documentaries: A Longitudinal Approach to Audiences Cover

Cognition, Relevance and Ideology Formation through Travel Documentaries: A Longitudinal Approach to Audiences

By: Jacopo Castaldi  
Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Angouri, J. and Wodak, R. (2014). ‘They became big in the shadow of the crisis’: the Greek success story and the rise of the far right. Discourse & Society, 25, pp. 540–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514536955
  2. Barthes, R. (1977). Image, Music, Text. London: Fontana.
  3. Baudry, J.L. and Williams, A. (1974). Ideological effects of the basic cinematographic apparatus. Film Quarterly, 28, pp. 39–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/1211632
  4. Benwell, B. (2007). New sexism? Readers’ responses to the use of irony in men’s magazines. Journalism Studies, 8, pp. 539–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701411797
  5. Castaldi, J. (2021). A multimodal analysis of the representation of the Rohingya crisis in BBC’s Burma with Simon Reeve (2018): Integrating Audience Research in Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies. Multimodal Communication, 10(1), pp. 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2020-0014
  6. Castaldi, J. (2022). Cognition and ideological effects in the interaction between viewers and BBC travel documentaries: Combining multimodal critical discourse analysis and audience research. Canterbury Christ Church University. Doctoral Dissertation.
  7. Castaldi, J. (2024). Keeping the myth of the British Empire alive: Combining a multimodal analysis of two BBC travel documentaries with audience research. In E. Zantides and S. Andreou (eds.), Semiotics and Visual Communication IV: Myths of Today (pp. 331–353). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  8. Chouliaraki, L. (2000). National identities in late modernity. A case study of audience reception. In M. Reisigl and R. Wodak (eds.), The Semiotics of Racism. Approaches in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 305–330). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
  9. Chouliaraki, L. (2003). Mediated experience and youth identities in a post-traditional order. In A. Georgakopoulou and J.K. Androutsopoulos (eds.). Discourse Constructions of Youth Identities (pp. 303–331). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  10. Condit, C. (1991). The rhetorical limits of polysemy. In R.K. Avery and D. Eason (eds.), Critical Perspectives on Media and Society (pp. 365–386). New York: The Guilford Press.
  11. Curran, J. (2002). Media and Power. London: Routledge.
  12. Demetriou, D. (2018). Discourse on immigration in the UK: representations and evaluations of Romanians and Bulgarians as ‘benefit tourists’. PhD Thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/5ebe4ee6a4955fd1c35264925cff3600/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=51922&diss=y(Accessed 7 June 2024).
  13. Edwards, E.B. (2016). “It’s irrelevant to me!” Young black women talk back to VH1’s Love and Hip Hop New York. Journal of Black Studies, 47, pp. 273– 292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934715627124
  14. Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.
  15. Forceville, C. (1999a). Educating the eye? Kress and Van Leeuwen’s reading images: The grammar of visual design (1996). Language and Literature, 8(2), pp. 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709900800204
  16. Forceville, C. (1999b). Art or ad? The influence of genre-attribution on the interpretation of images. SPIEL, 18(2), pp. 279–300.
  17. Forceville, C. (2020). Visual and Multimodal Communication: Applying the Relevance Principle. New York: Oxford University Press.
  18. Gerbner, G. and Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26(2), pp. 172–194.
  19. Giles, D. (2003). Media Psychology. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  20. Hall, S. (1980/2005). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe and P. Willis (eds.), Culture, Media, Language: Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 1972–79 (pp. 117–127). London: Routledge.
  21. Hart, C. (2018). ‘Riots engulfed the city’: An experimental study investigating the legitimating effects of fire metaphors in discourses of disorder. Discourse & Society, 29(3), pp. 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734663
  22. He, J. (2019). Two-layer reading positions in comments on online news discourse about China. Discourse & Communication, 13, pp. 473–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481319856206
  23. Ifantidou, E. and Tzanne, A. (2006). Multimodality and relevance in the Athens 2004. Olympic Games televised promotion. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses, No. 19 (Nov. 2006); pp. 191–210. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/5176
  24. Kosetzi, K. (2007). Representations of women in terms of gender roles and sexual practices in Σχεδ?ν Π?τ? (ΣΠ) ‘Almost Never’: the text and the audience. PhD Thesis, Lancashire, England, Lancaster University.
  25. Montgomery, M. (2007). The Discourse of Broadcast News. London: Routledge.
  26. Paterson, L.L., Coffey-Glover, L., and Peplow, D. (2016). Negotiating stance within discourses of class: reactions to benefits street. Discourse & Society, 27, pp. 195–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926515611558
  27. Phelan, S. (2018). Critical discourse analysis and media studies. In J. Flowerdew and J.E. Richardson (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies (pp. 285–297). London: Routledge.
  28. Phillips, L. (1999). Risk, reflexivity and democracy: mediating expert knowledge in the news. Nordicom Review, 21, pp. 115–35. 10.1515/nor-2017-0389
  29. Richardson, K. (1994). Interpreting breadline Britain. In U.H. Meinhof and K. Richardson (eds.), Text, Discourse and Context: Representations of Poverty in Britain (pp. 93–121). London: Longman.
  30. Richardson, K. (2000). Intertextuality and the discursive construction of knowledge: the case of economic understanding. In U.H. Meinhof and J. Smith (eds.). Intertextuality and the Media: From Genre to Everyday Life (pp. 76– 97). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  31. Piazza, R. and Haarman, L. (2016). A pragmatic cognitive model for the interpretation of verbal-visual communication in television news programmes. Visual Communication, 15(4), pp. 461–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357215621688
  32. Schrøder, K.C., Drotner, K., Kline, S. and Murray, C. (2003). Researching Audiences. London: Arnold.
  33. Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
  34. Sullivan, J.L. (2019). Media Audiences: Effects, Users, Institutions, and Power. Sage Publications.
  35. Van Dijk, T.A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
  36. Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). The representation of social actors. In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 32–70). London: Routledge.
  37. Walton, M.J. (2016). Buddhism, Politics and Political Thought in Myanmar. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Yus, F. (1998). Relevance theory and media discourse: A verbal-visual model of communication. Poetics, 25(5), pp. 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(97)00020-X
  39. Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated Communication in Context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  40. Yus, F. (2016). Humour and Relevance. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  41. Yus, F., (2022) Smartphone Communication: Interactions in the App Ecosystem. London and New York: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2024-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 113 - 137
Published on: Dec 21, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2024 Jacopo Castaldi, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.