Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Figurative Language, Emotion and Ideology in U.S. and Russian Geopolitical Narratives Towards Africa Cover

Figurative Language, Emotion and Ideology in U.S. and Russian Geopolitical Narratives Towards Africa

By: Issa Kante  
Open Access
|Dec 2024

References

  1. Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc & TagAnt [Computer Software]. Japan, Waseda University.
  2. Ayittey, G. (2005). Africa Unchained: The Blueprint for Africa’s Future. Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Bonnier, E. & Hedenskog, J. (2020). The United States and Russia in Africa: A survey of US and Russian political, economic and military-security relations with Africa. Swedish Defence Research Agency (FOI), FOI-R-5039-SE.
  4. Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Chilton, P. & Lakoff, G. (1995). Foreign policy by metaphor. In C. Schäffner & A. L. Wenden (Eds.), Language and peace (pp. 37–59). Harwood Academic Publishers.
  6. Chilton, P. & Schäffner, C. (2002). Politics as Text and Talk: Analytic Approaches to Political Discourse. John Benjamins.
  7. Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. Routledge.
  8. Cohen, H. J. (2020). US Policy toward Africa: Eight Decades of Realpolitik. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  9. Deignan, A. (2005). A Corpus Linguistic Perspective on the Relationship between Metonymy and Metaphor. Style, 39(1), 72–91.
  10. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Polity.
  11. Gerring, J. (1997). Ideology: A Definitional Analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 50(4), 957–994.
  12. Gibbs, R. W., & Wilson, N. L. (2002). Bodily Action and Metaphorical Meaning. Style, 36(3), 524–540.
  13. Guichard, M., Grätz, T., & Diallo, Y. (Eds.). (2014). Friendship, Descent and Alliance in Africa: Anthropological Perspectives. Berghahn Books.
  14. Hall, T. (2015). Emotional Diplomacy: Official Emotion on the International Stage. Cornell University Press.
  15. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2003 [1980]). Metaphors We Live by. University of Chicago Press.
  16. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Chelsea Green Publishing.
  17. Le Cam, M. (2023, August 6). The faces of Russia’s influence across the African continent. Le Monde. https://www.lemonde.fr/en/le-monde-africa/article/2023/08/06/the-faces-of-russia-s-influence-across-the-african-continent 6082513 124.html
  18. Legvold, R. (1979). The Super Rivals: Conflict in the Third World. Foreign Affairs, 57(4), 755–778.
  19. Lenard, Dragana Božić and Ćosić, Nevena, (2017). The Analysis of Metaphors and Metonymies in Political Speeches – A Case Study of the Former Croatian Prime Minister Ivo Sanader, in: ELR Journal, pp. 61–81.
  20. Littlemore, J. (2015). Metonymy: Hidden Shortcuts in Language, Thought and Communication. Cambridge University Press.
  21. Maru, Mehari Taddele (July 1st, 2019). A new cold war in Africa: Increasing tensions between China and the US will be detrimental to African prosperity and peace. Opinions, Al Jazeera.
  22. Mhaka, T. (2022, July 30). Russia (just like the West) is no true friend to Africa. Al Jazeera. https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/7/30/where-would-africa-be-without-russian-and-western-propaganda.
  23. Müller, R. (2005). Creative Metaphors in Political Discourse. Theoretical considerations on the basis of Swiss Speeches. Metaphorik.de.
  24. Musolff, A. (2018). Nations as persons: Collective identities in conflict. In B. Bös, S. Kleinke, S. Mollin & N. Hernández (Eds.), The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal – group – collective, vol 78, Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture (pp. 249–266). John Benjamins.
  25. Panther, K.-U. & Thornburg, L. L. (2004). The role of conceptual metonymy in meaning construction. Metaphorik.de, 06, 91–116.
  26. Parkinson, B. (1996). Emotions are social. British journal of psychology, 87(4), 663–683.
  27. Patterson, Molly & Monroe, Kristen R. (1998). Narrative in Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science, 1, 315–331.
  28. Radden, G. & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In K. Panther and G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in Language and Thought (pp. 17–60). John Benjamins.
  29. Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 23–61). Sage.
  30. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and Díez Velasco, O. (2004). Metonymic types and anaphoric reference. In G. Radden and K.U. Panther (Eds), Studies in Linguistic Motivation (pp. 293–320). De Gruyter.
  31. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. and Galera-Masegosa, A. (2011). Going beyond meta-phtonymy: Metaphoric and metonymic complexes in phrasal verb interpretation. Language Value 3(1), 1–29.
  32. Sargent, L. T. (2009). Contemporary Political Ideologies: A Comparative Analysis. 14th edition. Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  33. Shenhav, S. R. (2006). Political Narratives and Political Reality. International Political Science Review, 27(3), 245–262.
  34. Stronski, P. (2019). Late to the Party: Russia’s Return to Africa. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/10/16/late-to-party-russia-s-return-to-africa-pub-80056
  35. Taiwo, R. (2010). Metaphors in Nigerian Political Discourse. Obafemi Awololowo University, Nigeria.
  36. Thompson, J. B. (1988). Mass communication and modern culture: Contribution to a Critical Theory of Ideology. Sociology, 22(3), 359–383.
  37. Twardzisz, P. (2011). Metaphorisation of international relations discourse. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny, 2011(1), 17–32.
  38. Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis. In C. Schäffner and A. L. Wenden (Eds), Language and peace (pp. 17–33). Harwood Academic Publishers.
  39. Van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: a plea for diversity. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 95–120). Sage.
  40. Van Dijk, T. A. (2016). Critical Discourse Studies: a sociocognitive approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods for Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 62–85). Sage.
  41. Weise, R. E., & Macaulay, E. (1985). The Soviet-American struggle for influence in Africa: A pragmatic assessment. The African Review: A Journal of African Politics, Development and International Affairs, 12(2), 32–42.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2024-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 159 - 182
Published on: Dec 21, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2024 Issa Kante, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.