Knowledge Routines, Threads and Network Dynamics
By:
References
- Allen, B. (2021). “Indigenous Epistemologies of North America”. Episteme, 1–13.10.1017/epi.2021.37
- Andersen, J.P. and Hammarfelt, B. (2011). “Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields”. Scientometrics, 88(2), 371–383.10.1007/s11192-011-0408-8
- Arrow, K.J. (1962). “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.10.2307/2295952
- Beck, N. and Witt, U. (2019). “Austrian economics and the evolutionary paradigm”. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 57(1), 205–225.10.2478/slgr-2019-0013
- Chisholm, R. (1989). Theory of Knowledge. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
- Ciborowski, R.W., Kargol-Wasiluk, A. and Zalesko, M. (2019). “Time, Capital, and Technological Progress in the Austrian School of Economics”. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 57(1), 123–144.10.2478/slgr-2019-0008
- Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- De Ridder, J. (2019). “How Many Scientists Does It Take to Have Knowledge?”, In: McCain, K. and Kampourakis, K. (eds), What Is Scientific Knowledge? An Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology of Science. London: Rout-ledge, 3–17.10.4324/9780203703809-1
- De, S.N. (1961). Cholera: Its Pathology and Pathogenesis. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
- Descartes, R. (2006). A discourse on the method of correctly conducting one’s reason and seeking truth in the sciences. Translated by I. Maclean. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Devlin, W.J. and Bokulich, A. (eds), (2015). Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions – 50 Years On. Cham: Springer International Publishing. – Enfield, N.J. and Kockelman, P. (eds), (2017). Distributed Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- van Fraassen, B.C. (2012). “Modeling and Measurement: The Criterion of Empirical Grounding”. Philosophy of Science, 79(5), 773–784.10.1086/667847
- Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Goodman, N. (1983). Fact, fiction, and forecast. 4th ed. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- Hutchins, E. (2006). “The Distributed Cognition Perspective on Human Interaction”, In: Enfield, N.J. and Levinson, S. (eds), Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction (Wenner-Gren International Symposium Series). London: Routledge, 375–398.
- Kawalec, P. (2006). Przyczyna i wyjaśnianie: studium z filozofii i metodologii nauk. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
- Kawalec, P. (2016). “Interaction and Structural Representation in Calibration of Economic Models”. Studia Metodologiczne, 36(4), 131–145.
- Kawalec, P. (2017a). “Perspectival representation in DSGE models”. Economics and Business Review, 3(3), 80–99.10.18559/ebr.2017.3.5
- Kawalec, P. (2017b) “Towards an evolutionary model of science dynamics: generation and production of scientific knowledge”. Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa, 53(4)), 405–428.
- Kawalec, P. (2018a). Metodologia integralna: studium dynamiki wiedzy naukowej. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
- Kawalec, P. (2018b). “Transformations in Breakthrough Research: The Emergence of miRNAs as a Research Routine in Molecular Biology”. Open Information Science, 2(1), 127–146.10.1515/opis-2018-0010
- Kawalec, P. (2019). “The Science of Science – Some Recent Advances”. Ruch Filozoficzny, 75(2), 33–57.10.12775/RF.2019.019
- Kawalec, P. (2020a). “Cognitive Dynamics of Research Routines: Case Study of MicroRNA”, In: Giovagnoli, R. and Lowe, R. (eds), The Logic of Social Practices. Cham: Springer International Publishing (Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics), 133–152.10.1007/978-3-030-37305-4_9
- Kawalec, P. (2020b). “The dynamics of theories of economic growth: An impact of Unified Growth Theory”. Economics and Business Review, 6(2), 19–44.10.18559/ebr.2020.2.3
- Kawalec, P. (2020c). “The process of microRNAs discovery’. Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce, (68), 219–242.
- Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Latour, B. and Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. 2nd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Marciszewski, W. (2015). “On accelerations in science driven by daring ideas: Good messages from fallibilistic rationalism”. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 40(1), 19–41.10.1515/slgr-2015-0002
- Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Pentland, B.T. and Feldman, M.S. (2008). “Designing routines: On the folly of designing artifacts, while hoping for patterns of action”. Information and Organization, 18(4), 235–250.10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.08.001
- Pentland, B.T. and Hærem, T. (2015). “Organizational Routines as Patterns of Action: Implications for Organizational Behavior”. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 465–487.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111412
- Pierotti, R. (2010). Indigenous Knowledge, Ecology, and Evolutionary Biology. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203847114
- Sady, W. (2017). “Niedookreślenie teorii przez dane empiryczne a rewolucja relatywistyczna w fizyce”. Filozofia Nauki, 1(25), 31–48.
- Simonton, D.K. (1986). “Multiple discovery: Some Monte Carlo simulations and Gedanken experiments”. Scientometrics, 9(5–6), 269–280.10.1007/BF02017248
- Smith, V.L. (2003). “Constructivist and ecological rationality in economics”. American economic review, 93(3), 465–508.10.1257/000282803322156954
- de Solla Price, D.J. (1986). Little science, big science – and beyond. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Twardowski, K. (1979). “Actions and products. Comments on the border area of psychology, grammar, and logic”. In: Pelc, J. (ed.), Semiotics in Poland 1984–1969. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, PWN, 13–27.
- Woleński, J. (2016). “Logic in the light of cognitive science”. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 48(1), 87–101.10.1515/slgr-2016-0057
- Żegleń, U. (2018). “On Existential Dependence and Independence in the World of Thoughts and States of Affairs (with Reference to Eugenia Ginsberg-Blaustein’s and Roman Ingarden’s Analyses)”. In: Garrido,Á. and Wybraniec-Skardowska, U. (eds ), The Lvov–Warsaw school. Past and present. Cham: Birkhauser (Studies in Universal Logic), 249–262.10.1007/978-3-319-65430-0_19
Language: English
Page range: 247 - 268
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2022 Paweł Kawalec, Anna Kawalec, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.