Cognitive Artifacts and Their Virtues in Scientific Practice
References
- Afeltowicz, Ł. and Wachowski, W. (2015). “How far we can go without looking under the skin: The bounds of cognitive science”. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 40(1), 91–109. doi: 10.1515/slgr-2015-0005
- Becvar, A., Hollan, J. and Hutchins, E. (2008). “Representational gestures as cognitive artifacts for developing theories in a scientific laboratory”. In: Ackerman, M.S., Halverson, C.A., Erickson, T. and Kellogg, W.A. (eds.), Resources, Co-Evolution and Artifacts: Theory in CSCW. London: Springer, 117–143. doi: 10.1007/978-1-84628-901-9_5
- Brey, P. A. E. (2005). “The epistemology and ontology of human-computer interaction”. Minds and Machines, 15(3), 383–398. doi: 10.1007/s11023-005-9003-1
- Brown, G., Wyatt, J., Harris, R. and Yao, X. (2005). “Diversity creation methods: A survey and categorisation”. Information Fusion, 6(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2004.04.004
- Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W. (1959). “Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix”. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016
- Clark, A. (2016). Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190217013.001.0001
- Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. J. (1998). “The extended mind”. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19.10.1093/analys/58.1.7
- Davidson, D. (1991). “Epistemology externalized”. Dialectica, 45(2–3), 191–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-8361.1991.tb00986.x
- Facchin, M. (2021). “Structural representations do not meet the job description challenge”. Synthese. doi: 10.1007/s11229-021-03032-8
- Fasoli, M. (2018). “Substitutive, complementary and constitutive cognitive artifacts: Developing an interaction-centered approach”. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(3), 671–687. doi: 10.1007/s13164-017-0363-2
- Fodor, J. A. (1991). “The dogma that didn’t bark (A fragment of a naturalized epistemology)”. Mind, 100(2), 201–220. doi: 10.1093/mind/LI.202.200
- French, S. (2020). There Are No Such Things As Theories. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198848158.001.0001
- Frixione, M. (2001). “Tractable competence”. Minds and Machines, 379–397.10.1023/A:1017503201702
- Gablasova, D., Brezina, V. and McEnery, T. (2017). “Collocations in corpus-based language learning research: identifying, comparing, and interpreting the evidence”. Language Learning, 67(S1), 155–179. doi: 10.1111/lang.12225
- Gitelman, L. (ed.). (2013). “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9302.001.0001
- Gładziejewski, P. (2016). “Predictive coding and representationalism”. Synthese, 193(2), 559–582. doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0762-9
- Haugeland, J. (1998). Having Thought. Essays in the Metaphysics of Mind. Cambridge Mass./London: Harvard University Press.
- Heersmink, R. (2013). “A taxonomy of cognitive artifacts: function, information, and categories. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, (4), 465–481. doi: 10.1007/s13164-013-0148-1
- Heersmink, R. (2021). “Varieties of artifacts: embodied, perceptual, cognitive, and affective”. Topics in Cognitive Science, 13(4), 573–596. doi: 10.1111/tops.12 549
- Hellman, M. (1980). “A cryptanalytic time-memory trade-off”. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 26(4), 401–406. doi: 10.1109/TIT.1980.1056220
- Hochstein, E. (2016). “One mechanism, many models: A distributed theory of mechanistic explanation”. Synthese, 193(5), 1387–1407. doi: 10.1007/s11229-015-0844-8
- Hohol, M. (2020). Foundations of Geometric Cognition. New York: Routledge.
- Hohol, M. and Miłkowski, M. (2019). “Cognitive artifacts for geometric reasoning”. Foundations of Science, 24(4), 657–680. doi: 10.1007/s10699-019-09603-w
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.
- Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). “Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
- Jurgens, D., Kumar, S., Hoover, R., McFarland, D. and Jurafsky, D. (2018). “Measuring the evolution of a scientific field through citation frames”. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 391–406. doi: 10.1162/tacl a 00028
- Keas, M. N. (2018). “Systematizing the theoretical virtues”. Synthese, 195(6), 2761–2793. doi: 10.1007/s11229-017-1355-6
- Kilgarriff, A., Baisa, V., Bušta, J., Jakubíček, M., Kovář, V., Michelfeit, J., Rychly, P. and Suchomel, V. (2014). “The Sketch Engine: Ten years on”. Lexicography, 1, 7–36. doi: 10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9
- Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226217239.001.0001
- Larkin, J. and Simon, H. A. (1987). “Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words”. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(87)80026-5
- Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and Its Problem: Towards a Theory of ScientificGrowth. Berkeley Ca.: University of California Press.
- Lean, O. M., Rivelli, L. and Pence, C. H. (2021, accepted). “Digital literature analysis for empirical philosophy of science”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi: 10.1086/715049
- Litwin, P. and Miłkowski, M. (2020). “Unification by fiat: arrested development of predictive processing”. Cognitive Science, 44(7), e12867. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12867
- Marghetis, T. and Núñez, R. (2013). “The motion behind the symbols: a vital role for dynamism in the conceptualization of limits and continuity in expert mathematics”. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(2), 299–316. doi: 10.1111/tops.12013
- Medawar, P. (1963). “Is scientific paper a fraud?” The Listener, 70, 377–378.
- Miłkowski, M. (2010). “Making naturalised epistemology (slightly) normative”. In: Miłkowski, M. and Talmont-Kamiński, K. (eds.), Beyond Description: Naturalism and Normativity. London: College Publications, 72–84.
- Miłkowski, M., Clowes, R. W., Rucińska, Z., Przegalińska, A., Zawidzki, T., Gies, A., ... Hohol, M. (2018). “From wide cognition to mechanisms: a silent revolution”. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2393. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02393
- Miłkowski, M., Hensel, W. M., and Hohol, M. (2018). “Replicability or reproducibility? On the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail”. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 45(3), 163–172. doi: 10.1007/s10827-018-0702-z
- Mizrahi, M. (2021, accepted). “Theoretical virtues in scientific practice: an empirical study”. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi: 10.1086/714790
- Moretti, F. (2000). “Conjectures on World Literature”. New Left Review, 1, 54–68.
- Morgan, A. (2013). “Representations gone mental”. Synthese, 191(2), 213–244. doi: 10.1007/s11229-013-0328-7
- Nersessian, N. J. (2006). “The cognitive-cultural systems of the research laboratory”. Organization Studies, 27(1), 125–145. doi: 10.1177/0170840606061842
- Netz, R. (2011). The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Nirshberg, G. and Shapiro, L. (2021). “Structural and indicator representations: A difference in degree, not kind”. Synthese, 198, 7647–7664. doi: 10.1007/s11229-020-02537-y
- Norman, D. A. (1991). “Cognitive artifacts”. In: Carroll, J. M. (ed.), Designing Interaction: Psychology at the Human-Computer Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 17–38.
- Norman, D. A. (1993). Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes in the Age of the Machine. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.
- Pence, C. H., and Ramsey, G. (2018). “How to do digital philosophy of science”. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), 930–941. doi: 10.1086/699697
- Pessoa, L., Medina, L. and Desfilis, E. (2022). “Refocusing neuroscience: Moving away from mental categories and towards complex behaviours”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 377(1844), 20200534. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0534
- Piccinini, G. and Anderson, N. G. (2018). “Ontic pancomputationalism”. In: Cuffaro, M.E and Fletcher, S.C. (eds.), Physical Perspectives on Computation, Computational Perspectives on Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–38. doi: 10.1017/9781316759745.002
- Piper, A. (2020). Can We Be Wrong? The Problem of Textual Evidence in a Time of Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108922036
- Pitcher, D. and Ungerleider, L. G. (2021). “Evidence for a third visual pathway specialized for social perception”. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(2), 100–110. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2020.11.006
- Poldrack, R. A., Kittur, A., Kalar, D., Miller, E., Seppa, C., Gil, Y., ... Bilder, R. M. (2011). “The cognitive atlas: toward a knowledge foundation for cognitive neuroscience”. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 5. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00017
- Regt, H. W. de. (2017). Understanding Scientific Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190652913.001.0001
- Rupert, R. D. (2013). “Distributed cognition and extended-mind theory”. In: Kaldis, B. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
- Rychlý, P. (2008). “A lexicographer-friendly association score”. Proceedings of Second Workshop on Recent Advances in Slavonic Natural Languages Processing, 6–9. Brno: Masaryk University.
- Short, T. L. (2007). Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498350
- Soo Ko, B. (2019). ImageNet Classification Leaderboard. Retrieved March 13, 2022, from Computer-Vision-Leaderboard website: https://kobiso.github.io/Computer-Vision-Leaderboard/imagenet.html
- Stenning, K. and Lambalgen, M. V. (2008). Human Reasoning and Cognitive Science. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7964.001.0001
- Tan, M. and Le, Q. V. (2020). “EfficientNet: rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks”. ArXiv:1905.11946 [Cs, Stat]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11946
- Vaccari, A. P. (2017). “Against cognitive artifacts: Extended cognition and the problem of defining ‘artifact’”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 879–892. doi: 10.1007/s11097-016-9484-9
- Van Rooij, I. (2008). “The tractable cognition thesis”. Cognitive Science, 32(6), 939–984. doi: 10.1080/03640210801897856
- Wachowski, W. M. (2018). “Commentary: distributed cognition and distributed morality: agency, artifacts and systems”. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi: 10/gdcbs5
- Wimsatt, W. C. (2007). Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1pncnrh
- Wray, A. (2012). “What do we (think we) know about formulaic language? An evaluation of the current state of play”. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 231–254. doi: 10.1017/S026719051200013X
- Zhang, J. (1997). “The nature of external representations in problem solving”. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 179–217. doi: 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80022-6
- Zhang, J. and Norman, D. A. (1994). “Representations in distributed cognitive tasks”. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 87–122. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog1801_3
Language: English
Page range: 219 - 246
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Marcin Miłkowski, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.