Reasoning with Expectations About Causal Relations
References
- Casati, R. and Varzi, A. (2008). “Event concepts”. In: Shipley, T.F. and Zacks, J. (eds.), Understanding Events: From Perception to Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 31–54.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0002
- Croft, W. (2012). Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Davidson, D. (1969). The individuation of events. In: Rescher, N. (ed.), Essays in the Honor of Carl Hempel. Dordrecht: Springer, 216–234.10.1007/978-94-017-1466-2_11
- Gärdenfors, P. (1994). “The role of expectations in reasoning”. In: Masuch, M. and Polos, L. (eds.), Knowledge Representation and Reasoning Under Uncertainty, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1–16.10.1007/3-540-58095-6_1
- Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.
- Gärdenfors P. (2007). “Evolutionary and developmental aspects of intersubjectivity”. In: Liljenström, H. and Århem, P. (eds.), Consciousness Transitions: Phylogenetic, Ontogenetic and Physiological Aspects. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 281–305.10.1016/B978-044452977-0/50013-9
- Gärdenfors, P. (2014). The Geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces, Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.
- Gärdenfors, P. (2021). “Causal reasoning and event cognition as evolutionary determinants of language structure”. Entropy 23(7), 843.10.3390/e23070843
- Gärdenfors, P. (to appear). “Conceptual engineering for engineers (and for philosophers): The role of conceptual spaces”. In: Isaac, M.G., Koch, S. and Sharp, K. (eds.), New Perspectives on Conceptual Engineering. Vol. 1: Foundational Issues in Conceptual Engineering. Berlin: Springer.
- Gärdenfors, P. and Makinson, D. (1994). “Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations”. Artificial Intelligence 65, 197–245.10.1016/0004-3702(94)90017-5
- Gärdenfors, P. and Stephens, A. (2017). “Induction and knowledge-what”. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8, 471–491, DOI 10.1007/s13194-017-0196-y.
- Gärdenfors, P. and Warglien, M. (2012). “Using conceptual spaces to model actions and events”. Journal of Semantics 29, 487–519.10.1093/jos/ffs007
- Gärdenfors, P., Jost, J. and Warglien, M. (2018). “From actions to events: Three constraints on event mappings”. Frontiers in Psychology, 14 August 2018, DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01391.
- Giese, M. A. and Lappe, M. (2002). “Measurement of generalization fields for the recognition of biological motion”. Vision Research 42, 1847–1858.10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00093-7
- Gulz, A. (1991). The Planning of Action as a Cognitive and Biological Phenomenon, Lund University Cognitive Studies, 2. Lund: Lund University.
- Hume, D. (1748/2000). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00032980
- Leslie, A. M. (1994). “ToMM, ToBy, and agency: Core architecture and domain specificity”. In: Hirschfeld, L.A. and Gelman, S.A. (eds), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. New York: Cambridge University Press, 139–148.10.1017/CBO9780511752902.006
- Marr, D. and Vaina, L. (1982). “Representation and recognition of the movements of shapes”, Proceedings of the Royal Society in London, B214, 501–524.
- Michotte, A. (1963). The Perception of Causality. New York: Methuen. Mill, J. S. (1843). A System of Logic. London: John W. Parker.
- Osta Velez, M. and Gärdenfors, P. (2020). “Category-based induction in conceptual spaces”. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 96, DOI 10.1016/j.jmp.2020.1s 02357.
- Pearl, J. (2018). “Theoretical impediments to machine learning: With seven sparks from the causal revolution”. arXiv:1801.04016vi10.1145/3159652.3176182
- Rips, L. J. (1975). “Inductive judgments about natural categories”. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, 665–681.10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80055-7
- Shiriaev, A. S., Freidovich, L. B., Robertsson, A., Johansson, R., and Sand-berg, A. (2007). “Virtual-holonomic-constraints-based design of stable oscillations of Furuta pendulum: Theory and experiments”. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 23(4), 827–832.10.1109/TRO.2007.900597
- Talmy, L. (1988). “Force dynamics in language and cognition”. Cognitive Science 12, 49–100.10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2
- Warglien, M., Gärdenfors, P. and Westera, M. (2012). “Event structure, conceptual spaces and the semantics of verbs”. Theoretical Linguistics 38, 159–193.10.1515/tl-2012-0010
- White, P. A. (2012). “Visual impressions of causality: Effects of manipulating the direction of the target object’s motion in a collision event”. Visual Cognition 20(2), 121–142.10.1080/13506285.2011.653418
- Wolff P. (2007). “Representing causation”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 13, 82–111.10.1037/0096-3445.136.1.82
- Wolff, P. (2008). “Dynamics and the perception of causal events”. In: Thomas, S. and Zacks, J. (eds.), Understanding Events: How Humans See, Represent, and Act on Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 555–587.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195188370.003.0023
- Wolff, P. (2012). “Representing verbs with force vectors”. Theoretical Linguistics 38, 237–248.10.1515/tl-2012-0015
- Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., and Kawato, M. (2003). “A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 358(1431), 593–602.
- Woodward J. (2011). “A philosopher looks at tool use and causal understanding”. In: McCormack, T., Hoerl, C. and Butterfill, S. (eds.), Tool Use and Causal Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 18–50.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571154.003.0002
- Zacks, J. M. and Tversky, B. (2001). “Event structures in perception and conception”. Psychological Bulletin 127(1), 3–21.10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.3
Language: English
Page range: 201 - 217
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Peter Gärdenfors, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.