Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Concept Representation and the Geometric Model of Mind

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Amari, S.-I. (1977). “Neural theory of association and concept-formation”. Biological Cybernetics, 26(3), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00365229
  2. Ascoli, G.A. and Samsonovich, A. (2012). Semantic cognitive map. US Patent 8,190,422.
  3. Babichev, A. and Dabaghian, Y.A. (2018). “Topological schemas of memory spaces”. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 12, 27.10.3389/fncom.2018.00027
  4. Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M. and Desai, R. H. (2016). “Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation”. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33(3–4), 130–174.10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426
  5. Brock, A. C. (2013). “The history of introspection revisited”. In: Clegg, J.W. (ed.), Self-Observation in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge, 25–43.
  6. Dabaghian, Y. (2019). “Through synapses to spatial memory maps via a topological model”. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 572.10.1038/s41598-018-36807-0
  7. Dale R. and Spivey M.J. (2005). “From apples and oranges to symbolic dynamics: a framework for conciliating notions of cognitive representation”. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 17(4), 317–342.10.1080/09528130500283766
  8. Duch, W. (1989). “Schrödinger’s thoughts on perfect knowledge”. In: Bitsakis, E.I. and Nicolaides, C.A. (eds.), The Concept of Probability. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 5–14.10.1007/978-94-009-1175-8_2
  9. Duch, W. (1996). “Categorization, prototype theory and neural dynamics”. In: Yamakawa, T.Y. and. Matsumoto, G. (eds), Methodologies for the Conception, Design, and Application of Intelligent Systems, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Soft Computing, Iizuka: Singapore/River Edge, N.J., 482–485.
  10. Duch, W. (1997). “Platonic model of mind as an approximation to neurodynamics”. In: Amari, S.I. and Kasabov, N. (eds), Brain-Like Computing and Intelligent Information Systems. Singapour: Springer, 491–512.
  11. Duch, W. (2005). “Brain-inspired conscious computing architecture”. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 26, 1–22.
  12. Duch, W. (2012). “Mind-brain relations. Geometric perspective and neurophenomenology”, American Philosophical Association Newsletter, 12(1), 1–7.
  13. Duch, W. (2018). “Kurt Lewin, psychological constructs and sources of brain cognitive activity”. Polish Psychological Forum, 23(1), 5–19.
  14. Duch, W. (2021). “Memetics and neural models of conspiracy theories”. Patterns, 2(11), 100353.10.1016/j.patter.2021.100353
  15. Duch, W., Matykiewicz, P. and Pestian, J. (2008). “Neurolinguistic approach to natural language processing with applications to medical text analysis”. Neural Networks, 21(10), 1500–1510.10.1016/j.neunet.2008.05.008
  16. Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511624582
  17. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. (2003). The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities (Reprint edition). New York: Basic Books.
  18. Fernandino, L., Tong, J.-Q., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J. and Binder, J. R. (2022). “Decoding the information structure underlying the neural representation of concepts”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(6). https://doi.org.10.1073/pnas.210809111910.1073/pnas.2108091119
  19. Gärdenfors, P. (2004). Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press.
  20. Gärdenfors, P. (2014). The Geometry of Meaning: Semantics Based on Conceptual Spaces. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9629.001.0001
  21. Goertzel. B. (2006). The Hidden Pattern. Boca Raton, Fl.: BrownWalker. Harnad, S. (1990). “The symbol grounding problem”. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42(1), 335–346.
  22. Heusser, A. C., Fitzpatrick, P. C. and Manning, J. R. (2021). “Geometric models reveal behavioural and neural signatures of transforming experiences into memories”. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(7), 905–919.10.1038/s41562-021-01051-6
  23. Hoel, E. P. (2017). “When the map is better than the territory”. Entropy, 19(5), 188.10.3390/e19050188
  24. Hurlburt, R.T. and Schwitzgebel, E (2007). Describing Inner Experience? Proponent Meets Skeptic. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/7517.001.0001
  25. Hutchins, E. (2012). “Concepts in practice as sources of order”. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 19(3), 314–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2012.694006
  26. Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E. and Gallant, J. L. (2016). “Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex”. Nature, 532(7600), 453–458.
  27. Hyungsuk, J., Ploux, S. and Wehrli, E. (2003). Lexical Knowledge Representation with Contexonyms. 9th MT Summit Machine Translation, New Orleans, September 2003, 194–201. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00933207
  28. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
  29. Johnson-Laird, P.N. (1995). Mental Models, Deductive Reasoning, and the Brain. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press: 999–1008.
  30. Kelly, G. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs. New York: Norton.
  31. Komorowski, M. K., Rykaczewski, K., Piotrowski, T., Jurewicz, K., Wojciechowski, J., Keitel, A., Dreszer, J. and Duch, W. (2021). “ToFFi-Toolbox for frequency-based fingerprinting of brain signals”. Neurocomputing (in revision), and ArXiv:2110.09919
  32. Landauer, T. and Dumais, S. A. (1997). “Solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge”. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240.10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
  33. Laird, J. E., Lebiere, C. and Rosenbloom, P. S. (2017). “A standard model of the mind: Toward a common computational framework across artificial intelligence. Cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics”. AI Magazine, 38(4), 13–26.
  34. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://pl.scribd.com/book/262688082/Principles-of-Topological-Psychology10.1037/10019-000
  35. Lewin, K. (1938). The conceptual representation and the measurement of psychological forces. Durham N.C.: Duke University Press.10.1037/13613-000
  36. Neimeyer, R.A. and Neimeyer, G.J. (eds.), (2002). Advances in Personal Construct Psychology. New York: Praeger.
  37. Newell, A. and Simon, H.A. (1976). “Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search”. Communications of the ACM, 19(6), 113–126.10.1145/360018.360022
  38. O’Regan, J. K. (2011). Why Red Doesn’t Sound Like a Bell: Understanding the Feel of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  39. O’Reilly, R. C., Munakata, Y., Frank, M. J., Hazy, T. E., and Contributors (2020). Computational Cognitive Neuroscience. Wiki Book, 4th edition. https://CompCogNeuro.org
  40. Ploux, S. and Ji, H. (2003). “A model for matching semantic maps between languages (French/English, English/French)”. Computational Linguistics, 29(2), 155–178.10.1162/089120103322145298
  41. Ploux, S., Boussidan, A. and Ji, H. (2010). The Semantic Atlas: An Interactive Model of Lexical Representation. Proceedings of the Seventh Conference of International Language Resources Ans Evaluation: 1–5. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00933294
  42. Rykaczewski, K., Nikadon, J., Duch, W. and Piotrowski, T. (2021). “supFunSim: Spatial filtering toolbox for EEG”. Neuroinformatics, 19(1), 107–125.10.1007/s12021-020-09464-w
  43. Speer, N. K., Reynolds, J. R., Swallow, K. M. and Zacks, J. M. (2009). “Reading stories activates neural representations of visual and motor experiences”. Psychological Science, 20(8), 989–999. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02397.x
  44. Spivey, M.J. (2007). The Continuity of Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
  45. Tian, F., Wang, H., Cheng, W., Zhang, W. and Li, Y. (2021). “A high-density EEG study investigating VR Film editing and cognitive event segmentation theory”. Sensors, 21(21), 7176. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21217176
  46. Varley, T., and Hoel, E. (2021). “Emergence as the conversion of information: A unifying theory”. ArXiv:2104.13368 [Cs, Math]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.13368
  47. Varley, T. F., and Sporns, O. (2022). “Network nalysis of time series: novel approaches to network neuroscience”. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 15. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2021.78706810.3389/fnins.2021.787068
  48. Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics: Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  49. Zacks, J. M., Speer, N., Swallow, K. and Maley, C. (2010). “The brain’s cutting-room floor: segmentation of narrative cinema”. Frontiers in Human Neuro-science, 4. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnhum.2010.0016810.3389/fnhum.2010.00168
  50. Zhang, Y., Han, K., Worth, R. and Liu, Z. (2020). “Connecting concepts in the brain by mapping cortical representations of semantic relations”. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1877.10.1038/s41467-020-15804-w
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2022-0009 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 151 - 167
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2022 Włodzisław Duch, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.