Introduction. Some New Approaches to Knowledge Representation in Multidimensional Perspective: From Theory Through Experience to Scientific Practice
By:
References
- Ataria, Y. (2000). Consciousness in Flesh. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bartsch, R. (1998). Dynamic Conceptual Semantics. A Logico-Philosophical Investigation into Concept Formation and Understanding. Stanford: Stanford Center for Studies of Language and Information – CSLI Publications.
- Beer, R. (1997). “The dynamics of adaptive behaviour: A research program”. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 20, 257–289.10.1016/S0921-8890(96)00063-2
- Bratman, M.E. (1987). Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.
- Chemero, A. (2009). Radical Emboddied Cognitive Science. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8367.001.0001
- Churchland, P.S. (1989). Neurophilosophy. Towards a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4952.001.0001
- Churchland, P.S. and Sejnowski, T. (1992). Computational Brain. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2010.001.0001
- De Preester, H. (2002). “Naturalizing husserlian phenomenology: an introduction”. Psychoanalitical Perspectives, 20, 633–647.
- Duch, W. (1997). “Platonic model of mind as an approximation to neurodynamics”. In: Amari, S.I. and Kasabov, N. (eds.), Brain-Like Computing and Intelligent Information Systems. Singapore: Springer, 491–512.
- Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge Mass./London: The MIT Press/Bradford.
- Fauconnier, G. and Turner M. (1996). “Blending as a conceptual process of grammar”. In: Goldberg, A. (ed.), Conceptual Structure. Discourse and Language. Stanford: Centre for the Study of Langauge and Information – CSLI Publications, 113–130.
- Fauconnier, G. and Turner. M. (1998). “Conceptual integration networks”. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187.10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
- Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge Mass./London: The MIT Press/Breadford.10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001
- Fodor, J. (1987). Psychosemantics. The Problem of Meaning in Psychology of Mind. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5684.001.0001
- Fodor, J. and Lepore, E. (1992). Holism. A Shopper‘s Guide. Oxford: B. Blackwell.
- Gallagher, S. (2012). “Taking stock of phenomenology futures”. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50(2), 304–318.10.1111/j.2041-6962.2012.00108.x
- Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces. The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/2076.001.0001
- Gärdenfors, P. (2014). The Geometry of Meaning: Semantic Based on Conceptual Spaces. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9629.001.0001
- Gärdenfors, P. and Warglien, M. (2012). “Using conceptual spaces to model actions and events”. Journal of Semantics, 29, 487–519.10.1093/jos/ffs007
- Gibson, J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Hampton, J. (1999). “Concepts”. In: Wilson, R.A. and Keil, F. (eds.), The MIT Encyclopediae of Cognitive Science. Cambridge Mass./London: The MIT Press/Bredford.
- Kühle, L. (2017). “William James and the embodied mind”. Contemporary Pragmatism, 14(1), 51–75.10.1163/18758185-01401004
- Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Lewin, K. (1938). The Conceptual Represetation and the Measurement of Psychological Forces. Durham NC: Duke University Press.10.1037/13613-000
- Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds.) (1997). Concepts. Core Readings. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.
- Margolis, E. and Laurence, S. (eds.), (2019). The Conceptual Mind, New Direction in the Study of Concepts. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.
- Newell, A. and Simon, H. (1976). “Computer science as inquiry. Symbols and search”. In: Haugeland, J. (ed.), Mind Design. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press, 35–66.
- Peacocke, Ch. (1992). A Study of Concepts. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press.
- Peacocke, Ch. (2004). “Concepts, knowledge, reference and structure”. Mind and Language, 19(1), 85–98.10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00249.x
- Petitot, J. (2014). “Landmarks for neurogeometry”. In: Citti, G. and Sarti, A. (eds.), Neuromathematics of Vision, Berlin–Heidelberg, Springer, 1–85.10.1007/978-3-642-34444-2_1
- Shepard, R.N (1957). “Stimulus and response generalisation: A stochastic model relating generalization to distance in psychological space. Psychometrics, 22, 325–345.10.1007/BF02288967
- van Gelder, T. (1995). “What might cognition be, if not computation?”. The Journal of Philosophy, 92(7), 345–389.10.2307/2941061
- van Gelder, T. (1998). “The dynamic hypothesis in cognitive science”. Behavior and Brain Sciences, 21, 615–665.10.1017/S0140525X98001733
- van Gelder, T. And Port, R.F. (1995). “It’s about time. An overview of the dynamic approach to cognition.” In: van Gelder, T. and Port, R.F. (eds.), Mind and Motion, Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press, 1–43.
- Varela, F., Rosch, E. and Thomson, E. (1992). The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge Mass.: The MIT Press. (Revised Edition 2017).
- Zahavi, D. (2004). “Phenomenology and the project of naturalization”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3, 331–347.10.1023/B:PHEN.0000048935.94012.4e
- Zalta, E. N. (2001). “Models of presentation and fregean senses”. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 335–360.
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 150
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2022 Urszula M. Żegleń, Marcin Koszowy, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.