Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On the Role of Source and Target Words’ Meanings in Metaphorical Conceptualizations Cover

On the Role of Source and Target Words’ Meanings in Metaphorical Conceptualizations

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. Cacciari, C., & Corradini, P. (2015). Literal analysis and idiom retrieval in ambiguous idioms processing: a reading-time study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(7), 797–811.10.1080/20445911.2015.1049178
  2. Cameron, L. (1999). Operationalising ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds). Researching and applying metaphor, (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Carrol, G., & Littlemore, J. (2020). Resolving figurative expressions during reading: the role of familiarity, transparency, and context. Discourse Processes, 57(7), 609–626.10.1080/0163853X.2020.1729041
  4. Croft, W. (1993). The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(4), 335–370.10.1515/cogl.1993.4.4.335
  5. Dancygier, B. & Sweetser E. (2014). Figurative language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Deignan, A. & Potter, L. (2004). A corpus study of metaphors and metonyms in English and Italian. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1231–1252.10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.010
  7. Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
  8. Fillmore, C. (1982). Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, (pp. 37–111). Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.
  9. Gibbs, R. W. (1992). What do idioms really mean? Journal of Memory and Language, 31(4), 485–506.10.1016/0749-596X(92)90025-S
  10. Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Gibbs, R. W. (1999). Intentions in the experience of meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139164054
  12. Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  13. Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Are ‘deliberate’ metaphors really deliberate? A question of human consciousness and action. Metaphor and the Social World, 1(1), 26–52.10.1075/msw.1.1.03gib
  14. Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  15. Gibbs, R. W., Bogdonovitch, J., Sykes, J., & Barr, D. (1997). Metaphor in idiom comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 141–154.10.1006/jmla.1996.2506
  16. Gibbs, R. W., & Chen, E. (2018). Metaphor and the automatic mind. Metaphor and the Social World, 8(1), 40–63.10.1075/msw.16026.gib
  17. Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139168779
  18. Gibbs, R. W., Nayak, N. P., & Cutting, C. (1989). How to kick the bucket and not decompose: Analyzability and idiom processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 576–593.10.1016/0749-596X(89)90014-4
  19. Gibbs, R.W, & O’Brien, J. (1990). Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning. Cognition, 36, 35–68.10.1016/0010-0277(90)90053-M
  20. Glucksberg, S. (2008). How metaphors create categories – quickly. In R.W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, (pp. 67–83). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97(1), 3–18.10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3
  22. Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1993). How metaphors work. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (2nd ed.), (pp. 401–424). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M., & Manfredi, D. (1997). Property attribution in metaphor comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(1), 50–67.10.1006/jmla.1996.2479
  24. Glucksberg, S., & McGlone, M. S. (1999). When love is not a journey: what metaphors mean. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1541–1558.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00003-X
  25. Grady, J. (1997). Foundations of meaning: primary metaphor and primary scenes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California.
  26. Handl, S., & Schmid, H.-J. (Eds.) (2011). Windows to the mind: metaphor, metonymy and conceptual blending. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110238198
  27. Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226177847.001.0001
  28. Johnson, M. (2017). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason. How our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226500393.001.0001
  29. Kövecses, Z. (1986). Metaphors of anger, pride, and love: a Lexical approach to the structure of concepts. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pb.vii.8
  30. Kövecses, Z. (1988). The language of love: the semantics of passion in conversational English. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
  31. Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511614408
  32. Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford and New York: Cambridge University Press.
  33. Kövecses, Z. (2011). Recent developments in metaphor theory: Are the new views rival ones? Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 11–25.10.1075/rcl.9.1.02kov
  34. Kövecses, Z. (2015). Surprise as a conceptual category. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 13(2), 270–290.10.1075/rcl.13.2.01kov
  35. Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(2), 321–347.10.1515/cog-2016-0052
  36. Kövecses, Z. (2020). Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108859127
  37. Kövecses, Z. & Szabcó, P. (1996). Idioms: A View from Cognitive Semantics. Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 326–355.10.1093/applin/17.3.326
  38. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony, (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.), (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  39. Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain’s metaphor circuitry: metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience [Accessed 16 December 2014]. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958/full#h110.3389/fnhum.2014.00958
  40. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  41. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
  42. Lakoff, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1987). The cognitive model of anger inherent in American English. In D. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought, (pp. 195–221). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  43. Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: a field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
  44. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Standford, CA, Stanford: University Press.
  45. Langacker, R.W. (1999). Grammar and conceptualization. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110800524
  46. Langacker, R.W. (2008). Cognitive grammar: a basic introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
  47. Langacker, R.W. (2013). Essentials of cognitive grammar. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  48. Libben, M., and Titone, D. (2008). The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory and Cognition, 36(6), 1103–1121.10.3758/MC.36.6.1103
  49. Low, G. (1999). Validating metaphor research projects. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.) Researching and applying metaphor, (pp. 48–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  50. Musolff, A. (2006). Metaphor scenarios in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 21(1), 23–38.10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
  51. Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, (pp. 48–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  52. Ruiz De Mendoza, F. (1998). On the nature of blending as a cognitive phenomenon. Journal of Pragmatics, 30(3), 259–274.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00006-X
  53. Sanford, D. (2012). Metaphors and conceptual schemata that are emergent over tokens of use. Journal of Cognitive Science, 13(3), 355–392.10.17791/jcs.2012.13.3.355
  54. Schweigert, W., & Moates, D. (1988). Familiar idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17(4), 281–296.10.1007/BF01067198
  55. Steen, G. (2008). The paradox of metaphor: Why we need a three-dimensional model of metaphor. Metaphor and Symbol, 23(4), 213–241.10.1080/10926480802426753
  56. Steen, G. (2011). The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 26–64.10.1075/rcl.9.1.03ste
  57. Steen, G. (2015). Developing, testing, and interpreting deliberate metaphor theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90(1), 67–72.10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
  58. Stefanowisch, A. (2006). Words and their metaphors: A corpus-based approach. In A. Stefanowisch and S. Gries (Eds), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy, (pp. 63–105). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  59. Svanlund, J. (2007). Metaphor and convention. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(1), 47–89.10.1515/COG.2007.003
  60. Sullivan, K. (2013). Frames and constructions in metaphoric language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.14
  61. Titone, D., & Connine, C. (1999). On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1655–1674.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00008-9
  62. Titone, D., & Libben, M. (2014). Time-dependent effects of decomposability, familiarity and literal plausibility on idiom meaning activation: A cross-modal priming investigation. The Mental Lexicon, 9(3), 473–496.10.1075/ml.9.3.05tit
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2022-0005 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 103
Published on: Dec 30, 2022
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2022 El Mustapha Lemghari, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.