Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Comparison of Three Assessment Scales in a Neonatal Unit in Poland Cover

The Comparison of Three Assessment Scales in a Neonatal Unit in Poland

Open Access
|Dec 2021

References

  1. Alvarez-Garcia, A., Fornieles-Deu, A., Costas-Moragas, C., & Botet-Mussons, F. (2015). Neurobehavioral conditions and effects of gender, weight and severity in preterm infants according to the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale. Anales de Psicologia, 31(3), 818–824. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.3.17018110.6018/analesps.31.3.170181
  2. Amini, M., Aliabadi, F., Alizade, M., Kalani, M., & Qorbani, M. (2016). The Relationship between Motor Function and Behavioral Function in Infants with Low Birth Weight. Iran J Child Neurol., 10(4): 49–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v10i4.10965
  3. Auber, E. (2008). The variability of human growth and development. In J. S. Tecklin (Ed.), Pediatric Physical Therapy. Fourth edition (pp. 17–20). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194263080230965110.1080/01942630802309651
  4. Barbosa, V. M., Campbell, S. K., Sheftel, D., Singh, J., & Beligere, N. (2003). Longitudinal performance of infants with cerebral palsy on the Test of Infant Motor Performance and on the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 23(3): 7–29. doi: 10.1080/j006v23n03_0210.1080/J006v23n03_02
  5. Belot, R. A., Bouteloup, M., Mariage, A., Candilis-huisman, D., Mottet, N., & Mellier, D. (2021). Relevance of Neonatal Behavior Assessment Scale for Infants With Somatic Disorders: Comparison on One Matched Group of Control. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 8, 506384. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.50638410.3389/fped.2020.506384
  6. Bouwstra, H., Dijk-Stigter, G. R., Grooten, H. M., Janssen-Plas, F. E., Koopmans, A. J., Mulder, C. D., van Belle, A., & Hadders-Algra M. (2010). Predictive value of definitely abnormal general movements in the general population. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52(5), 456–461. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03529.x10.1111/j.1469-8749.2009.03529.x
  7. Brazelton, T. B., & Nugent, J. K. (2011). Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale 4th Edition. Mac Keith Press, London.
  8. Brown, N., & Spittle, A. (2014). Neurobehavioral Evaluation in the Preterm and Term Infant. Curr Pediatr Rev., 10(1), 65–72. doi: 10.2174/157339631001140 40812131010.2174/157339631001140408121310
  9. Büşra, K-V., Mine, Ç., Zeynep, İ., Burak, T., Emine, E., & Asuman, Ç. (2016). The comparison of general movements assessment and neurological examination during early infancy. The Turkish Journal of Pediatrics, 58, 54–62. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2016.01.00810.24953/turkjped.2016.01.008
  10. Darsaklis, V., Snider, L. M., Majnemer, A., & Mazer, B. (2010). Predictive validity of Prechtl’s Method on the Qualitative Assessment of General Movements: a systematic review of the evidence. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 53(10), 896–906. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04017.x10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04017.x
  11. Einspieler, C., Prechtl, H. F., Ferrari, F., Cioni, G., & Bos, A. F. (1997). The qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants-review of the methodology. Early Hum Dev., 50(1), 47–60. doi: 10.1016/s0378-3782(97)00092-310.1016/S0378-3782(97)00092-3
  12. Hadders-Algra, M. (2004). General movements: a window for early identification of children at high risk for developmental disorders. The Journal of Pediatrics, 145(2), 12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2004.05.01710.1016/j.jpeds.2004.05.017
  13. Hall, D. M., & Baird, G. (1986). Developmental tests and scales. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 61, 213–215. doi: 10.1136/adc.61.3.21310.1136/adc.61.3.213
  14. Jeng, S. F., Yau, K. I., Chen, L. C., & Hsiao, S. F. (2000). Alberta infant motor scale: reliability and validity when used on preterm infants in Taiwan. Physical Therapy, 80(2), 168–178. doi:10.1155/2018/219716310.1155/2018/2197163
  15. de Jesus, V. R., de Oliveira, P. M. N., & Azevedo, V. M. G. O. (2018). Effects of hammock positioning in behavioral status, vital signs, and pain in preterms: A case series study. Brazilian J. Phys. Ther., 22, 304–309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.03.00210.1016/j.bjpt.2018.03.002
  16. Kwong, A. K., Olsen, J. E., FitzGerald, T. L., Doyle, L. W., Cheong, J. L. & Spittle, A. J. (2018). Spontaneous infant movements that predict later cerebral palsy: reply to Hadders-Algra and Philippi. Dev Med Child Neurol., 60, 1289–1289. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.1403610.1111/dmcn.14036
  17. Liao, P. M., & Campbell, S. K. (2004). Examination of the Item Structure of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale. Pediatric Physical Therapy., 16(1): 31–38. doi: 10.1097/01.PEP.0000114843.92102.9810.1097/01.PEP.0000114843.92102.98
  18. Malak, R., Sikorska, D., Rosołek, M., Baum, E., Mojs, E., Daroszewski, P., Matecka, M., Fechner, B. et al. (2021). Impact of umbilical cord arterial pH, gestational age, and birth weight on neurodevelopmental outcomes for preterm neonates. PeerJ, 9:e12043. doi: https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1204310.7717/peerj.12043
  19. Ohgi, S., Arisawa, K., Takahashi, T., Kusumoto, T., Goto, Y., Akiyama T., & Saito, H. (2003). Neonatal behavioral assessment scale as a predictor of later developmental disabilities of low birth-weight and/or premature infants. Brain & Development, 25(5), 313–321. doi: 10.1016/s0387-7604(02)00233-410.1016/S0387-7604(02)00233-4
  20. Ribas, C. G., Andreazza, M. G., Neves, V. C. & Valderramas, S. (2019). Effectiveness of hammock positioning in reducing pain and improving sleep-wakefulness state in preterm infants. Respir Care., 64, 384–389. doi: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.0626510.4187/respcare.06265
  21. Ricci, E., Einspieler, C., & Craig, A. K. (2018) Feasibility of Using the General Movements Assessment of Infants in the United States. Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, 38(3), 269–279. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2017.13 9538010.1080/01942638.2017.1395380
  22. Syrengelas, D., Siahanidou, T., Kourlaba, G., Kleisiouni, P., Bakoula, C., & Chrousos, G. P. (2010). Standardization of the Alberta infant motor scale in full-term Greek infants: Preliminary results. Early Human Development, 86(4), 245–249. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.03.00910.1016/j.earlhumdev.2010.03.009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2021-0039 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 635 - 646
Published on: Dec 30, 2021
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2021 Aleksandra Tabaczyńska, Roksana Malak, Brittany Fechner, Ewa Mojs, Włodzimierz Samborski, Ewa Baum, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.