References
- Aust, A. (2013). Modern Treaty Law and Practice, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139152341
- Austin. J. (with Hart, H.L.A.) (1954). The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and The Uses of The Study of Jurisprudence. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson (Original work published 1832).
- Cassese, A, (2005). International Law (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Chan, P.C.W. (2009). The Legal Status of Taiwan and the Legality of the Use of Force in a Cross-Taiwan Strait Conflict, Chinese Journal of International Law, 8(2), 455–492.10.1093/chinesejil/jmp014
- Deng, F.M. (2010). From ‘Sovereignty as Responsibility’ to the ‘Responsibility to Protect’, Global Responsibility to Protect, 2, 353–370.10.1163/187598410X519534
- Evans. G. (2009). Russia, Georgia and the Responsibility to protect, Amsterdam Law Forum, 1, 25–28.10.37974/ALF.55
- Fawcett, J.E.S. (1953). The Legal Character of International Agreements, British Yearbook of International Law, 30, 381–400.
- Hart, H.L.A. (1961). Concept of Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Higgins, R. (2009). Themes & Theories – Selected Essays, Speeches, and Writings in International Law – Volume I. New York: Oxford Univerity PressKoskenniemi, M. (2006). From Apology to Utopia – The Structure of International Legal Argument, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Kelsen, H. (1967). Principles of International Law (Rev. and ed. R.W. Tucker) (2nd ed.). New York: Hold, Rinehart and Windston.
- Klabbers, J. (2002). An Introduction to International Institutional Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165051
- Klabbers, J. (2020). Governance by Academics: The Invention of Memoranda of Understanding, Zeitschrift für ausl¨andischesöffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 80, 35–73.
- Koskenniemi, M. (2006). From Apology to Utopia – The Structure of International Legal Argument, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511493713
- Lauterpach H. (1933). The Functions of Law in the International Community, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Matczak, M. (2008). Interpretacja prawnicza w świetle semantyki Kripkego-Putmana [Legal interpretation in the light of Kripke-Putman semantics]. Państwo i Prawo, 2008/6, 68–78.
- Posner, R.A (1990), The Problems of Jurisprudence, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Radbruch, G. (2006). Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law (1946) (B. Litschewski-Paulson, S.L. Paulson, Trans,). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 1–11.10.1093/ojls/gqi041
- Salmond, J. (with Williams, G.L.) (1947). Jurisprudence, 10th ed. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
- Simma, B. (1994). From Bilateralism to Community Interest. Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law – Recueil des cours, 250.
- Shahabuddeen, M. (1996). Precedent in the World Court, Cambridge: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511720840
- Talmon, S. (2015). Determining Customary International Law: The ICJ’s Methodology between Induction, Deduction and Assertion. European Journal of International Law, 26(2), 417–443.10.1093/ejil/chv020
- Tomuschat, C. (2019). Enforcement of International Law – From the Authority of Hart Law to the Impact of Flexible Methods, Zeitschrift für ausl¨andisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht, 79, 579–631.
- Trindade, A.A.A. (2013). International Law for Humandkind – Towards a New Jus Gentium (2nd ed.). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
- Villiger, M.E. (2009). The 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties – 40 Years After. Collected Courses of The Hague Academy of International Law – Recueil des cours, 344.
- Welsh, J.M. (2013), Norm Contestation and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 5, 365–39610.1163/1875984X-00504002
- Zajadło-Węglarz, P. (2017). Aktualność debaty na temat koncepcji odpowiedzialności za ochronę [Topicality of the debate on Responsibility to Protect], Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze, XXXVIII, 567–574.