Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Data-Driven Dialogue Models: Applying Formal and Computational Tools to the Study of Financial And Moral Dialogues

Open Access
|Nov 2020

References

  1. Ametller, J., Robles, S., & Borrell, J. (2003). Agent Migration over FIPA ACL Messages. In International Workshop on Mobile Agents for Telecommunication Applications (pp. 210–219). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
  2. Bench-Capon, T.J. (1998). Specification and Implementation of Toulmin Dialogue Game. In Proceedings of JURIX 98 (pp. 5–20). Jurix – The Foundation for Legal Knowledge Based Systems. Retreived March 20, 2020 from: http://jurix.nl/proceedings/.
  3. Bex, F., Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2014). Generalising Argument Dialogue with the Dialogue Game Execution Platform. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2014) (pp. 141–152). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press,.
  4. Black, E., & Hunter, A. (2012). Executable Logic for Dialogical Argumentation. In ECAI 2012: 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 27–31 August 2012, Montpellier, France (pp. 15–20). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press.
  5. Budzynska, K., Rocci, A., & Yaskorska, O. (2014a). Financial Dialogue Games: A Protocol for Earnings Conference Calls. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument COMMA 2014 (pp. 19–30). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press.
  6. Budzynska, K., Janier, M., Kang, J., Reed, C., Saint-Dizier, P., Stede, M., & Yaskorska, O., (2014b). Towards Argument Mining from Dialogue. In S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed & F. Cerutti (eds.), Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument COMMA 2014 (pp. 185–196). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press.
  7. Crawford Camiciottoli, B. (2007). The Language of Business Studies Lectures: A Corpus Assisted Analysis. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.10.1075/pbns.157
  8. O’Donnell, M. (2008). The UAM CorpusTool: Software for Corpus Annotation and Exploration. In Proceedings of the XXVI Congreso de AESLA (pp. 3–5), Almeria, Spain.
  9. Finin, T., Fritzson, R., McKay, D., & McEntire, R. (1994). KQML as an agent communication language. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 456–463). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
  10. Hamblin, C. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.
  11. Kacprzak, M., & Yaskorska, O. (2014). Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies. Argumentation 28(3), 349–369.10.1007/s10503-014-9324-4
  12. Lawrence, J., Janier, M., & Reed, C.A. (2015). Working with Open Argument Corpora. In M. Lewiński & D. Mohammed (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Argumentation (ECA 2015). London: College Publications.
  13. Lawrence, J., Bex, F., & Reed, C. (2012). Dialogues on the Argument Web: Mixed Initiative Argumentation with Arvina, Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2012). Vienna: IOS Press.
  14. Lorenzen, D. N. (1972). The Kāpālikas and Kālāmukhas: Two Lost Śaivite Sects. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.10.1525/9780520324947
  15. Łupkowski, P. (2017). IEL-based Formal Dialogue System for Tutorials. Logic and Logical Philosophy, 2017, 26(3), 287–320.10.12775/LLP.2017.013
  16. Maudet, N. & Chaib-Draa, B. (2002). Commitment-Based and Dialogue-Game-Based Protocols: New Trends in Agent Communication Languages. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 17(2), 157–179.10.1017/S0269888902000486
  17. Palmieri, R., Rocci, A., & Kudrautsava, N. (2015). Argumentation in Earnings Conference Calls. Corporate Standpoints and Analysts’ Challenges. Studies in Communication Sciences, 15(1), 120–132.
  18. Parsons, S., & Jennings, N. R. (1996). Negotiation through Argumentation – A Preliminary Report. InProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (pp. 267–274). Kyoto: ICMAS.
  19. Parsons, S., McBurney, P., & Wooldridge, M. (2003). The Mechanics of Some Formal Inter-Agent Dialogues In Workshop on Agent Communication Languages (pp. 329–348). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
  20. Pease, A., Budzynska, K., Lawrence, J., & Reed C. (2014). Lakatos Games for Mathematical Argument. S. Parsons, N. Oren, C. Reed, & F. Cerutti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2014) (pp. 59–66). Amsterdam/Berlin/Tokyo/Washington, DC: IOS Press.
  21. Reed, C., & Budzynska, K. (2011). How dialogues create arguments In: F. H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell (Eds) Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation – ISSA 2010 (pp. 1633–1645). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
  22. Reed, C., & Walton, D. (2007). Argumentation Schemes in Dialogue. In H.V. Hansen, et. al. (Eds.), Dissensus and the Search for Common Ground, CD-ROM (pp. 1–11). Windsor, ON: OSSA.
  23. Reed, C., & Wells S. (2007). Dialogical Argument as an Interface to Complex Debates. IEEE Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 22, 60–65.10.1109/MIS.2007.106
  24. Schroeder, M., Plewe, D. A., & Raab, A. (1998). Ultima Ratio: Should Hamlet kill Claudius? In AGENTS ’98: Proceedings of the second international conference on autonomous agents, May 1998 (pp. 467–468).
  25. Searle, J. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173438
  26. Snaith, M., Lawrence, J., & Reed, C. (2010). Mixed Initiative Argument in Public Deliberation. In F. De Cindio, Macintosh, A. & Peraboni, C. (Eds), From e-Participation to Online Deliberation. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Online Deliberation (OD2010). University of Leeds & Università degli Studi di Milano: Leeds, UK.
  27. Walton, D., & Krabbe, E. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany: S.U.N.Y. Press.
  28. Wells, S., & Reed, C. (2012). A Domain Specific Language for Describing Diverse Systems of Dialogue. Journal of Applied Logic, 10(4), 309–329.10.1016/j.jal.2012.09.001
  29. Wiśniewski, A. (2013). Questions, Inferences, and Scenarios. London: College Publications.
  30. Woods, J., & Walton, D. (1978). Arresting Circles in Formal Dialogues. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 7, 73–90.10.1007/BF00245921
  31. Yaskorska, O. (2014). Recognising Argumentation in Dialogical Context. In B. Garssen, D. Godden, G. Mitchell, & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 1–11), Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0034 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 185 - 208
Published on: Nov 4, 2020
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2020 Olena Yaskorska-Shah, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.