Have a personal or library account? Click to login
How Does Ritualized Behavior Lower Anxiety? The Role of Cognitive Load and Conscious Preoccupation in Anxiety Reduction Cover

How Does Ritualized Behavior Lower Anxiety? The Role of Cognitive Load and Conscious Preoccupation in Anxiety Reduction

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 62 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. Abramowitz, J. S., Tolin, D. F. & Street, G. P. (2001). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression: A meta-analysis of controlled studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 21(5), 683–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00057-X10.1016/S0272-7358(00)00057-X
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Anastasi, M. W. & Newberg, A. B. (2008). A preliminary study of the acute effects of religious ritual on anxiety. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 14(2), 163–165. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2007.067510.1089/acm.2007.0675
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Baddeley, A. (2012). Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-10042210.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bargh, J. A., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., Gollwitzer, P. M. & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1014–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.101410.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Berry, L. M. & Laskey, B. (2012). A review of obsessive intrusive thoughts in the general population. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 1(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2012.02.00210.1016/j.jocrd.2012.02.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Boyer, P. & Liénard, P. (2006). Why ritualized behavior? Precaution systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(6), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0600933210.1017/S0140525X06009332
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Brooks, A. W., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Gino, F., Galinsky, A. D., Norton, M. I. & Schweitzer, M. E. (2016). Don’t stop believing: Rituals improve performance by decreasing anxiety. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137(1), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.07.00410.1016/j.obhdp.2016.07.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Clark, D. A. (Ed.). (2005). Intrusive thoughts in clinical disorders: Theory, research, and treatment. Guilford Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive Functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64(1), 135–168. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-14375010.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Doallo, S., Holguín, S. R. & Cadaveira, F. (2006). Attentional load affects automatic emotional processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 17(17), 1797–1801. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000246325.51191.3910.1097/01.wnr.0000246325.51191.39
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Dvorak-Bertsch, J. D., Curtin, J. J., Rubinstein, T. J. & Newman, J. P. (2007). Anxiety moderates the interplay between cognitive and affective processing. Psychological Science, 18(8), 699–705. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01963.x10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01963.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Eitam, B. & Higgins, E. T. (2010). Motivation in mental accessibility: Relevance of a representation (ROAR) as a new framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00309.x10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00309.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Eitam, B. & Higgins, E. T. (2016). From reaction (‘priming’) to motivated selection: Changing conceptualizations of accessibility. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.01710.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.017
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Erber, R. & Tesser, A. (1992). Task effort and the regulation of mood: The absorption hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28(4), 339–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(92)90050-T10.1016/0022-1031(92)90050-T
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Erk, S., Abler, B. & Walter, H. (2006). Cognitive modulation of emotion anticipation. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24(4), 1227–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04976.x10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.04976.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Erk, S., Kleczar, A. & Walter, H. (2007). Valence-specific regulation effects in a working memory task with emotional context. NeuroImage, 37(2), 623–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.00610.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.006
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Gyurak, A., Gross, J. J., & Etkin, A. (2011). Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a dual-process framework. Cognition and Emotion, 25(3), 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.54416010.1080/02699931.2010.544160
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Hobson, N. M., Schroeder, J., Risen, J. L., Xygalatas, D. & Inzlicht, M. (2018). The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(3), 260–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/108886831773494410.1177/1088868317734944
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Ju, Y. J. & Lien, Y. W. (2016). Better control with less effort: The advantage of using focused-breathing strategy over focused-distraction strategy on thought suppression, Consciousness and Cognition, 40(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.12.00210.1016/j.concog.2015.12.002
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Julien, D., O’Connor, K. P. & Aardema, F. (2009). Intrusions related to obsessive-compulsive disorder: a question of content or context? Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65(7), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.2057810.1002/jclp.20578
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Karl, J. A. & Fischer, R. (2018). Rituals, repetitiveness and cognitive load. Human Nature, 29(1), 418–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-018-9325-310.1007/s12110-018-9325-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. King, R. & Schaefer, A. (2011). The emotional startle effect is disrupted by a concurrent working memory task. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01062.x10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01062.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Krátký, J., Lang, M., Shaver, J. H., Jerotijević, D. & Xygalatas, D. (2016). Anxiety and ritualization: Can attention discriminate compulsion from routine? Communicative and Integrative Biology, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2016.117479910.1080/19420889.2016.1174799
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Lang, M., Krátký, J., Shaver, J. H., Jerotijević, D. & Xygalatas, D. (2015). Effects of anxiety on spontaneous ritualized behavior. Current Biology, 25(14), 1892–1897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.05.04910.1016/j.cub.2015.05.049
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Lim, S. L., Padmala, S. & Pessoa, L. (2008). Affective learning modulates spatial competition during low-load attentional conditions. Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1267–1278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.00310.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Lin, Y. J. & Wicker, F. W. (2007). A comparison of the effects of thought suppression, distraction and concentration. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(12), 2924–2937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.00410.1016/j.brat.2007.08.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Luciano, J. V. & González, S. A. (2007). Analysis of the efficacy of different thought suppression strategies. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 7(3), 335–345.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. MacNamara, A., Ferri, J. & Hajcak, G. (2011). Working memory load reduces the late positive potential and this effect is attenuated with increasing anxiety. Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(3), 321–331. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-011-0036-z10.3758/s13415-011-0036-z
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Magee, J. C., Dreyer-Oren, S. E., Sarfan, L. D., Teachman, B. A. & Clerkin, E. M. (2019). Don’t tell me what to think: Comparing self- and other-generated distraction methods for controlling intrusive thinking. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders, 23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocrd.2017.12.00310.1016/j.jocrd.2017.12.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Magee, J. C., Harden, K. P. & Teachman, B. A. (2012). Psychopathology and thought suppression: A quantitative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(3), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.00110.1016/j.cpr.2012.01.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Malinowski, B. (1948). Magic, Science, and Religion. In B. Malinowski, Magic, Science and Religion, and Other Essays (pp. 1–71). Boston: Beacon Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. May, J., Andrade, J., Batey, H., Berry, L. M. & Kavanagh, D. J. (2010). Less food for thought. Impact of attentional instructions on intrusive thoughts about snack foods. Appetite, 55(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2010.06.01410.1016/j.appet.2010.06.014
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Mitchell, D. G. V., Nakic, M., Fridberg, D., Kamel, N., Pine, D. S. & Blair, R. J. R. (2007). The impact of processing load on emotion. NeuroImage, 34(3), 1299–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.01210.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.10.012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Moors, A. & De Houwer, J. (2006). Automaticity: A theoretical and conceptual analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 297–326. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.29710.1037/0033-2909.132.2.297
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Moran, T. P. (2016). Anxiety and working memory capacity: A meta-analysis and narrative review. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 831–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul000005110.1037/bul0000051
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Najmi, S., Riemann, B. C. & Wegner, D. M. (2009). Managing unwanted intrusive thoughts in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Relative effectiveness of suppression, focused distraction, and acceptance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 47(6), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.02.01510.1016/j.brat.2009.02.015
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Pennycook, G. (2018). A perspective on the theoretical foundation of dual-process models. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual Process Theory 2.0 (pp. 5–27). New York: Psychology Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Pessoa, L., Padmala, S. & Morland, T. (2005). Fate of unattended fearful faces in the amygdala is determined by both attentional resources and cognitive modulation. NeuroImage, 28(1), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.04810.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.05.048
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems: A cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23(5), 571–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(85)90105-610.1016/0005-7967(85)90105-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Salkovskis, P. M. & Reynolds, M. (1994). Thought suppression and smoking cessation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(2), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)90112-010.1016/0005-7967(94)90112-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Shackman, A. J., Sarinopoulos, I., Maxwell, J. S., Pizzagalli, D. A., Lavric, A. & Davidson, R. J. (2006). Anxiety selectively disrupts visuospatial working memory. Emotion, 6(1), 40–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.4010.1037/1528-3542.6.1.40
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Simpson, J. R., Snyder, A. Z., Gusnard, D. A. & Raichle, M. E. (2001). Emotion-induced changes in human medial prefrontal cortex: I. During cognitive task performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 683–687. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.68310.1073/pnas.98.2.683
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Slepian, M. L., Oikawa, M. & Smyth, J. M. (2014). Suppressing thoughts of evaluation while being evaluated. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.1219710.1111/jasp.12197
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Sosis, R. & Handwerker, W. P. (2011). Psalms and coping with uncertainty: Religious Israeli women’s responses to the 2006 Lebanon War. American Anthropologist, 113(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01305.x10.1111/j.1548-1433.2010.01305.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Spangler, D. P. & Friedman, B. H. (2017). A little goes a long way: Low working memory load is associated with optimal distractor inhibition and increased vagal control under anxiety. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11:43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.0004310.3389/fnhum.2017.00043
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Teasdale, J. D., Dritschel, B. H., Taylor, M. J., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C. A., Nimmo-Smith, I. & Baddeley, A. D. (1995). Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources. Memory & Cognition, 23(5), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF0319725710.3758/BF03197257
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Teasdale, J. D., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C. A. & Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and stimulus-independent thought: Effects of memory load and presentation rate. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/0954144930852012810.1080/09541449308520128
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Tonna, M., Marchesi, C. & Parmigiani, S. (2019). The biological origins of rituals: An interdisciplinary perspective. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 98(1), 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.03110.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.031
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Van Dillen, L. F. & Derks, B. (2012). Working memory load reduces facilitated processing of threatening faces: An ERP study. Emotion, 12(6), 1340–1349. https://doi.org/10.1037/a002862410.1037/a0028624
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Van Dillen, L. F., Heslenfeld, D. J. & Koole, S. L. (2009). Tuning down the emotional brain: An fMRI study of the effects of cognitive load on the processing of affective images.NeuroImage, 45(4), 1212–1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.01610.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Van Dillen, L. F. & Koole, S. L. (2007). Clearing the mind: A working memory model of distraction from negative mood. Emotion, 7(4), 715–723. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.71510.1037/1528-3542.7.4.715
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Van Dillen, L. F. & Koole, S. L. (2009). How automatic is “automatic vigilance”? The role of working memory in attentional interference of negative information. Cognition and Emotion, 23(6), 1106–1117. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269993080233817810.1080/02699930802338178
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Vytal, K., Cornwell, B., Arkin, N. & Grillon, C. (2012). Describing the interplay between anxiety and cognition: From impaired performance under low cognitive load to reduced anxiety under high load. Psychophysiology, 49(6), 842–852. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01358.x10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01358.x
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Wang, D., Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2020). Ironic Effects of Thought Suppression: A Meta-Analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(3), 778–793. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/c64fp10.31234/osf.io/c64fp
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Wang, D., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. & Hagger, M. S. (2017). Mechanisms underlying effective thought suppression using focused-distraction strategies: A self-determination theory approach. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory Research, and Practice, 4(4), 367–380. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns000013810.1037/cns0000138
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Wang, D., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. & Hagger, M. S. (2018). Why distractors with need-supportive content can mitigate ironic effects of thought suppression. Motivation and Emotion, 42(2), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-017-9653-310.1007/s11031-017-9653-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review, 101(1), 34–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.101.1.3410.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. Wegner, D. M. (2009). How to think, say, or do precisely the worst thing for any occasion. Science, 325(5936), 48–50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.116734610.1126/science.1167346
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. Wegner, D. M. & Erber, R. (1992). The hyperaccessibility of suppressed thoughts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(6), 903–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.6.90310.1037/0022-3514.63.6.903
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. Wegner, D. M., Erber, R. & Zanakos, S. (1993). Ironic processes in the mental control of mood and mood-related thought. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(6), 1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.109310.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1093
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Carter, S. R. & White, T. L. (1987). Paradoxical effects of thought suppression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.510.1037/0022-3514.53.1.5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. Wegner, D. M., Schneider, D. J., Knutson, B. & McMahon, S. R. (1991). Polluting the stream of consciousness: The effect of thought suppression on the mind’s environment. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 15(2), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF0117320410.1007/BF01173204
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. Wenzlaff, R. M. & Wegner, D. M. (2000). Thought suppression. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 59–91. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.5910.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.59
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 187 - 205
Published on: Oct 11, 2020
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
ritual,
ritualized behavior,
anxiety,
cognitive load,
conscious preoccupation
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2020 Aneta Niczyporuk, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 62 (2020): Issue 1 (June 2020)Next article