Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Epistemic Justification of Testimonial Beliefs and the Categories of Egophoricity and Evidentiality in Natural Languages: An Insoluble Paradox of Thomas Reid's Anti-Reductionism Cover

Epistemic Justification of Testimonial Beliefs and the Categories of Egophoricity and Evidentiality in Natural Languages: An Insoluble Paradox of Thomas Reid's Anti-Reductionism

Open Access
|Oct 2020

References

  1. Adelaar, W. F. H. (1977). Tarma Quechua: Grammar, Text, Dictionary. Lisse: Peter de Ridder Press.10.1163/9789004626409
  2. Adelaar, W. F. H. (with the collaboration of P. C. Muysken). (2007). The Languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Adler, J. (2012). Epistemological problems of testimony. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved July 2015 from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/testimony-episprob/.
  4. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2003). Evidentiality in Tariana. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), Studies in Evidentiality (pp. 131–164). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.54.09aik
  5. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001
  6. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2014). The grammar of knowledge: a cross–linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. In A. Y. Aikhenvald & R. M. W. Dixon (Eds.), The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-Linguistic Typology (pp. 1–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.001.0001
  7. Aikhenvald, A. Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. (Eds.). (2003). Studies in Evidentiality. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.54
  8. Aikhenvald, A. Y. & Dixon, R. M. W. (Eds.). (2014). The Grammar of Knowledge. A Cross-Linguistic Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198701316.001.0001
  9. Alston, W. (2000). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  10. Arnauld, A. & Nicole, P. (1662/1996). Logic or the Art of Thinking. Trans. by J. V. Buroker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166768
  11. Audi, R. (1997). The place of testimony in the fabric of knowledge and justification. American Philosophical Quarterly, 34(4), 405–422.
  12. Audi, R. (2006). Testimony, credulity, and veracity. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony (pp. 25–49). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0002
  13. Augustine. (427/1871). Retractationes. In The Works of Aurelius Augustinus, Bishop of Hippo. Ed. by M. Dods. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark.
  14. Barnes, J. (1984). Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb. International Journal of American Linguistics, 50, 255–271.10.1086/465835
  15. Chafe, W. (1986). Evidentiality in English conversation and academic writing. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology (pp. 261–272). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  16. Chafe, W. & Nichols, J. (Eds.). (1986). Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  17. Coady, C. A. J. (1992). Testimony. A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  18. Coady, C. A. J. (2004). Reid and the social operations of mind. In T. Cuneo & R. Van Woudenberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid (pp. 180–203). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521812704.008
  19. Creissels, D. (2008). Remarks on so-called ‘conjunct/disjunct’ systems. In Syntax of the World’s Languages III, Berlin. Retrieved June 2014 from http://www.deniscreissels.fr/public/Creissels-conj.disj.pdf.
  20. Cuneo, T. & Van Woudenberg, R. (Eds.). (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521812704
  21. Curnow, T. J. (2002). Conjunct/disjunct marking in Awa Pit. Linguistics, 40, 3(2002), 611–627.10.1515/ling.2002.025
  22. Davidson, D. (1984). Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. De Haan, F. (1999). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18(1), 83–101.
  24. De Haan, F. (2005). Encoding speaker perspective: Evidentials. In Z. Frajzyngier & A. Hodges & D. S. Rood (Eds.), Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories (pp. 379–397). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/slcs.72.18haa
  25. Descartes, R. (1637/1984). Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting the Reason, and Seeking the Truth in the Sciences. In The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, Vol. 1, J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff & D. Murdoch (Eds. and Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805042
  26. Dickinson, C. (1999). Semantic and pragmatic dimensions of Tsafiki evidential and mirative markers. Chicago Linguistic Society, 35 (The Panels), 29–44.
  27. Dickinson, C. (2000). Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language, 24(2), 379–421.10.1075/sl.24.2.06dic
  28. Faller, M. (2002). Semantics and Pragmatics of Evidentials in Cuzco Quechua. PhD Dissertation, Stanford University. Retrieved June 2016 from http://personalpages.manchester.ac.uk/staff/martina.t.faller/documents/Thesis.pdf.
  29. Faulkner, P. (2011). Knowledge on Trust. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199589784.001.0001
  30. Fricker, E. (2006). Testimony and epistemic autonomy. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony (pp. 225–250). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0011
  31. Gettier, E. (1963). Is justified true belief knowledge? Analysis, 23(1963), 121–123.10.1093/analys/23.6.121
  32. Gilbert, D. T. (1991). How mental systems believe? American Psychologists, 46(2), 107–119.10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107
  33. Goldberg, S. C. (2010). Relying on Others: An Essay in Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593248.001.0001
  34. Graham, P. J. (2006). Testimonial justification: inferential or non–inferential. Philosophical Quarterly, 56, 84–95.10.1111/j.1467-9213.2005.00430.x
  35. Greco, J. (2012). Recent work on testimonial knowledge. American Philosophical Quarterly, 49(1), January 2012, 15–28.
  36. Greco, J. (2015). Testimonial knowledge and the flow of information. In D. Henderson & J. Greco (Eds.), Epistemic Evaluation (pp. 274–290). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199642632.003.0012
  37. Guentchéva, Z. (Ed.). (1996). L’énonciation médiatisée. Louvain, Paris: Éditions Peeters.
  38. Hale, A. (1980). Person markers: finite conjunct and disjunct verb forms in Newari. In R. Trail (Ed.), Papers in Southeast Asian Linguistics 7 (pp. 95–106). Pacific Linguistics.
  39. Hargreaves, D. (2005). Agency and intentional action in Kathmandu Newar. Himalayan Linguistics, 5, 1–48.10.5070/H95022977
  40. Hume, D. (1748/1999). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. by L. A. Selby-Bigge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00032980
  41. Johanson, L. & Utas, B. (Eds.) (2000). Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110805284
  42. Kusch, M. (2002a). Testimony in communitarian epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A, 33(2), 335–354.10.1016/S0039-3681(02)00008-0
  43. Kusch, M. (2002b). Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199251223.003.0006
  44. Lackey, J. (2008). Learning from Words: Testimony as a Source of Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219162.001.0001
  45. Lackey, J. & Sosa, E. (Eds.). (2006). The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.001.0001
  46. Lechniak, M. (2011). Przekonania i zmiana przekonań. Analiza logiczna i filozoficzna. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
  47. Locke, J. (1690/1975). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Ed. by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00018020
  48. Łukasiewicz, E. (2014). Obligatoryjne określniki źródła wiedzy w językach naturalnych i ich epistemologiczne konsekwencje. Filozofia Nauki, XXII, 2 (86), 97–115.
  49. Łukasiewicz, E. (2018). Linguistic Evidentiality and Epistemic Justification of Beliefs. Bydgoszcz: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Kazimierza Wielkiego.
  50. Magometov, A. (1982). Megebskij dialekt darginskogo jazyka (The Mehweb dialect of the Dargwa Language). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.
  51. McMyler, B. (2011). Testimony, Trust and Authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794331.001.0001
  52. Moran, R. (2005/2006). Getting told and being believed. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony (pp. 272–306). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0013
  53. Plato. (c. 369 BC/2014). Theaetetus. Trans. by B. Jowett. Retrieved July 2015 from https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/p/plato/p71th/.
  54. Plungian, V. A. (2010). Types of verbal evidentiality marking: An overview. In G. Diewald & E. Smirnova (Eds.), Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages (pp. 15–58). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110223972.15
  55. Post, M. W. (2013). Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo. In T. Thornes, E. Andvik, G. Hyslop & J. Jansen (Eds.), Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation (pp. 107–130). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/tsl.103.06pos
  56. Price, H. H. (1969). Belief. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
  57. Pritchard, D. (2004). The epistemology of testimony. Philosophical Issues, 14, Epistemology, 2004, 326–348.10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00033.x
  58. Reid, T. (1764/2002a). An Inquiry into the Human Mind, On the Principles of Common Sense. Ed. by D. R. Brookes. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.10.1037/11974-000
  59. Reid, T. (1785/2002b). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Ed. by D. R. Brookes. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.10.1093/oseo/instance.00106533
  60. Sun, J. (1993). Evidentials in Amdo Tibetan. Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, 63(4), 945–1001.
  61. Thomas Aquinas. (1258/1987). Commentary on Boethius’s De Trinitate. Trans. by A. Mauer. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Medieval Studies.
  62. Tournadre, N. (2008). Arguments against the concept of ‘conjunct’/‘disjunct’ in Tibetan. In B. Huber, M. Volkart & P. Wildmer (Eds.), Chomolangma, Demawend und Kasbek: Festschrift für Roland Bielmeier zu seinem 65. Geburt-stag (pp. 281–308). Halle: IITBS.
  63. Van Cleve, J. (2004). Reid’s theory of perception. In T. Cuneo & R. Van Woudenberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid (pp. 101–133). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521812704.005
  64. Van Cleve, J. (2006). Reid on the credit of human testimony. In J. Lackey & E. Sosa (Eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony (pp. 50–74). Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0003
  65. Weber, D. J. (1986). Information, perspective, profile and patterns in Quechua. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology (pp. 137–155). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  66. Weber, D. J. (1989). A Grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  67. Willett, T. (1988). A cross-linguistic survey of the grammaticalization of evidentiality. Studies in Language, 12, 51–97.10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil
  68. Wolterstorff, N. (1996). John Locke and the Ethics of Belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511598234
  69. Wolterstorff, N. (2004). Reid on common sense. In T. Cuneo & R. Van Woudenberg (Eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Thomas Reid (pp. 77–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL0521812704.004
  70. Woodbury, A. C. (1986). Interactions of tense and evidentiality: A study of Sherpa and English. In W. Chafe & J. Nichols (Eds.), Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology (pp. 188–202). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  71. Zagzebski, T. L. (1996). Virtues of the Mind. An Inquiry into the Nature of Virtue and the Ethical Foundations of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174763
  72. Zagzebski, T. L. (1999). What is knowledge? In J. Greco & E. Sosa (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (pp. 92–116). Malden, MA: Blackwell.10.1111/b.9780631202912.1998.00006.x
  73. Zagzebski, T. L. (2012). Epistemic Authority. A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199936472.001.0001
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 137 - 168
Published on: Oct 11, 2020
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2020 Elżbieta Łukasiewicz, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.