Have a personal or library account? Click to login

References

  1. Aubusson, P. J., Harrison, A. G. and Ritchie, S. M. (2006). Metaphor and Analogy: Serious Thought in Science Education. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison and S. M. Ritchie (Eds.), Analogy in Science (pp. 1–10). Dordrecht: Springer. http://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_110.1007/1-4020-3830-5_1
  2. Bartha, P. (2019). Analogy and Analogical Reasoning. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved December 29, 2019 from: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reasoning-analogy/
  3. Beall, J. C. (2009). Spandrels of truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268733.001.0001
  4. Beardsley, M. C. (1962). The Metaphorical Twist. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 22(3), 293–307. http://doi.org/10.2307/210441510.2307/2104415
  5. Beardsley, M. C. (1981). Aesthetics, Problems in the Philosophy of Criticism, (2nd edition). Hackett Publishing.
  6. Bernsten, D. & Kennedy, J. M. (1996). Unresolved Contradictions Specifying Attitudes in Metaphor, Irony, Understatement and Tautology. Poetics, 24, 13–29.10.1016/0304-422X(95)00013-A
  7. Bigelow, J. (1988). The Reality of Numbers: A Physicalist’s Philosophy of Mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  8. Black, M. (1962). Metaphor. In M. Black (Ed.), Models and Metaphors (pp. 25–47). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  9. Butters, R. R. (1970). On the Interpretation of Deviant Utterances. Journal of Linguistics, 6, 105–110.10.1017/S0022226700002401
  10. Campbell, P. (1975). Metaphor and Linguistic Theory. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 61, 1–12.10.1080/00335637509383263
  11. Cohen, T. (1976). Notes on Metaphor. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 34, 249–259.10.1111/1540_6245.jaac34.3.0249
  12. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration network. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. Retrieved December 29, 2019 from: http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/~faucon/BEIJING/CIN.pdf10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
  13. Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2008). Rethinking metaphor. In R. Gibbs (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 53–67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Fox, J. F. (1987). Truth-maker. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 65, 188–207.10.1080/00048408712342871
  15. Frege, G. (1977). Pisma semantyczne. Warszawa: PWN.
  16. Gentner D., Bowdle B., Wolff P. & Borobat C. (2001). Metaphor Is Like Analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak & B. K. Kokinov (Eds.), Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 199–254). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  17. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2006). Embodiment in Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  18. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. (2006). Metaphor Interpretation as Embodied Simulation. Mind & Language, 21(3), 434–458. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00285.x
  19. Gibbs, R. W. Jr. & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, Imagination and Simulation: Psycholinguistic Evidence. In R. W. Gibbs Jr. (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 247–261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.01110.1017/CBO9780511816802.011
  20. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.) Syntax and Semantics, 3 (pp. 22–40). Academic Press. Reprinted as ch. 2 of Grice. Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press, 1989. Retrieved December 29, 2019 from: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ls/studypacks/Grice-Logic.pdf10.1163/9789004368811_003
  21. Haglund J. (2013). Collaborative and Self-generated Analogies in Science Education. Studies in Science Education. 49(1) 35–68. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:621708/FULLTEXT01.pdf10.1080/03057267.2013.801119
  22. Hobbes, T. (1996). Leviathan. R. Tuck (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  23. Hofstadter, D., Sandler, E. (2013). Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York: Basic Books.
  24. Katz, J. J. (1964). Semi-sentences. In J. Fodor & J. Katz (Eds.), The Structure of Language (pp. 400–416). Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  25. Kelling, G. L. (1991). Crime and Metaphor: Toward a New Concept of Policing. City Journal, 1 Autumn. Retrieved December 29, 2019 from: http://www.city-journal.org/story.php?id=1577
  26. Kelly, G. (2002). The Psychology of Personal Constructs: Volume One: Theory and Personality. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203405970
  27. Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor Comprehension: A Computational Theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 257–266.10.3758/BF03212981
  28. Kittay, E. F. (1991). Metaphor: Its Cognitive Force and Linguistic Structure. Philosophical Review, 100(1), 112–115.10.2307/2185518
  29. Kittay, E. F. & Lehrer, A. (1981). Semantic Fields and the Structure of Metaphor. Studies in Language, 5, 31–63. http://doi.org/10.1075/sl.5.1.03kit10.1075/sl.5.1.03kit
  30. Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. London: Hutchinson & Co.
  31. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
  32. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Conceptual Metaphor in Everyday Language. The Journal of Philosophy, 377(8), 453–486. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/202546410.2307/2025464
  33. Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
  34. Lappin, S. (1981). Sorts, Ontology, and Metaphor: The Semantics Sortal Structure. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 36(5), 571–598.
  35. Marciszewski, W. (1994). Sztuka rozumowania w świetle logiki. (p. 3). Warszawa: Aleph.
  36. Margalit, A. & Goldblum, N. (1995). A Metaphor Game. Synthese, 104(2), 299–323.10.1007/BF01063874
  37. Norton, J. D. (2011). Analogy. http://www.pitt.edu/~jdnorton/papers/Analogy.pdf
  38. Ortony, A. (1993). Metaphor, language and thought. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 1–16). Cambridge University Press, (second edition). http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.00310.1017/CBO9781139173865.003
  39. Pinker, S. (1997). How the Mind Works. [lecture]. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfGJGXJ2xtI
  40. Prandi, M. (2004). The Building Blocks of Meaning: Ideas for a Philosophical Grammar. John Benjamins Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hcp.1310.1075/hcp.13
  41. Priest, G., Beall, J. C. & Armour-Garb, B. (2004). (Eds.) The Law of Non-Contradiction. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265176.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199265176.001.0001
  42. Priest, G. (1987). In Contradiction. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, (2nd expanded edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263301.001.0001
  43. Priest, G. (1995). Beyond the Limits of Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2nd expanded edition, 2002). Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199254057.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199254057.001.0001
  44. Priest, G. & Routley, R. (1989). The History of Paraconsistent Logic. Chapter 1. In G. Priest, R. Routley & J. Norman (Eds.), Paraconsistent Logics: Essays on the Inconsistent. Munich: Philosophia Verlag.
  45. Richards, I. A. (1936). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  46. Robinson, G. (2000). What Lies Outside Language. Philosophical Investigations, 23(4), 279–291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9205.0012710.1111/1467-9205.00127
  47. Rodriguez-Pereyra, G. (2005). Why Truthmakers. In H. Beebee & J. Dodd (Eds.), Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate (pp. 17–31). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Reprinted in E. J. Lowe & A. Rami (Eds.), Truth and Truth-making (pp. 227–241). Stockfield: Acumen, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283569.003.000210.1093/acprof:oso/9780199283569.003.0002
  48. Rumelhart, D. E. & Abrahamson, A. A. (1973). A Model for Analogical Reasoning. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 1–28.10.1016/0010-0285(73)90023-6
  49. Rybarkiewicz, D. (1998). The Structure of Metaphor: Towards a Pragmatic Approach. Logica Trianguli. 2, 103–115.
  50. Rybarkiewicz, D. (2015). Out of the Box Thinking. In P. Łukowski, A. Gemel & B. Żukowski (Eds.), Cognition, Meaning, and Action: Lodz – Lund Studies in Cognitive Science (pp. 152–167). Łódź & Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
  51. Ryle, G. (1949). The Concept of Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  52. Sadock, J. (1974). Towards a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
  53. Schön, D. A. (1993). Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-setting in Social Policy. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 137–163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.01110.1017/CBO9781139173865.011
  54. Thibodeau, P. H. & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we Think with: The Role of Metaphor in Reasoning. PLoS ONE 6(2), Article e16782. http://doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016782. Retrieved December 29, 2019 from: http://lera.ucsd.edu/papers/crime-metaphors.pdf10.1371/journal.pone.0016782
  55. Tversky, A. (1977). Features of Similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327–352.10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327
  56. Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  57. Weinreich, H. (1981). Ogólna semantyka metafory [General Semantics of Metaphor]. Teksty: teoria literatury, krytyka, interpretacja, 57, 61–75.
  58. Wittgenstein, L. (1914). Notes Dictated to G.E. Moore in Norway, Appendix II of Notebooks 1914–1916, 2nd ed. G.H. von Wright & G.E.M. Anscombe (Eds.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell (1979).
  59. Ziff, P. (1964). On Understanding ‘Understanding Utterances’. In J. Fodor & J. Katz (Eds.), The Structure of Language (pp. 390–399). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 95 - 111
Published on: Oct 11, 2020
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2020 Dorota Rybarkiewicz, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.