Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“That’s the Metaphor You’re Going for?” Deliberate Metaphor and Humor Cover

“That’s the Metaphor You’re Going for?” Deliberate Metaphor and Humor

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1991). Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model. HUMOR – International Journal of Humor Research, 4(3–4), 293–347. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1991.4.3–4.29310.1515/humr.1991.4.3-4.293
  2. Attardo, S. (2001). Humorous texts: A semantic and pragmatic analysis. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110887969
  3. Attardo, S. (2015). Humorous metaphors. In G. Brône, K. Feyaerts & T. Veale (Eds.), Cognitive linguistics and humor research (pp. 13–48). Berlin and Boston, MA: Mouton de Gruyter.
  4. Attardo, S. (2017). The general theory of verbal humor. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 126–142). New York: Routledge.
  5. Brock, A. (2016). The borders of humorous intent – The case of TV comedies. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.00310.1016/j.pragma.2015.12.003
  6. Burgers, C., Brugman, B. C., Renardel de Lavalette, K. Y., & Steen, G. J. (2016). HIP: A method for linguistic hyperbole identification in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2016.118704110.1080/10926488.2016.1187041
  7. Carter, B. & Craig, T. (Producers). (2005–2014). How I met your mother [Television series]. Retrieved from http://www.netflix.com
  8. Gibbs, R. W. (2011). Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 529–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2011.60610310.1080/0163853X.2011.606103
  9. Gibbs, R. W. (2015). Does deliberate metaphor theory have a future? Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.01610.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.016
  10. Gibbs, R. W. (2017). Metaphor wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107762350
  11. Higgs, M. M. (2020, January 6). Go ahead and complain. It might be good for you. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com
  12. Kövecses, Z. (2008). Conceptual metaphor theory: Some criticisms and alternative proposals. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6, 168–184. https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.6.08kov10.1075/arcl.6.08kov
  13. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  14. Larkin-Galiñanes, C. (2017). An overview of humor theory. In S. Attardo (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and humor (pp. 4–16). New York: Routledge.
  15. Macmillan Dictionary online. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.macmillandictionary.com/
  16. McGivney, A. (2020, January 8). “Like sending bees to war”: The deadly truth behind your almond milk obsession. The Guardian: International Edition. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/
  17. Minhaj, H. (Creator). 2019. Patriot act with Hasan Minhaj. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.netflix.com/
  18. Moran, J. M., Wig, G. S., Adams, R. B., Janata, P., & Kelley, W. M. (2004). Neural correlates of humor detection and appreciation. NeuroImage, 21(3), 1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.01710.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.10.017
  19. Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39.10.1080/10926480709336752
  20. Raskin, V. (1985). Semantic mechanisms of humor. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reider Publishing Company.
  21. Reijnierse, W. G. (2017). The value of deliberate metaphor. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT, Netherlands Graduate School.
  22. Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J. (2018). DMIP: A method for identifying potentially deliberate metaphor in language use. Corpus Pragmatics, 2(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-017-0026-710.1007/s41701-017-0026-7
  23. Šorm, E., & Steen, G. J. (2018). VISMIP: Towards a method for visual metaphor identification. In G. Steen (Ed.), Visual metaphor: Structure and process (pp. 47–88). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  24. Steen, G. (2011). From three dimensions to five steps: The value of deliberate metaphor. Metaphorik, 21, 83–110.
  25. Steen, G. (2015). Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory. Journal of Pragmatics, 90, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.01310.1016/j.pragma.2015.03.013
  26. Steen, G. (2017). Deliberate Metaphor Theory: Basic assumptions, main tenets, urgent issues. Intercultural Pragmatics, 14(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-000110.1515/ip-2017-0001
  27. Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., & Krennmayr, T. (2010). Metaphor in usage. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(4), 765–796. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.02410.1515/cogl.2010.024
  28. Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/celcr.14
  29. Tsakona, V. (2013). Okras and the metapragmatic stereotypes of humour. In M. Dynel (Ed.), Developments in linguistic humour theory (pp. 25–48). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 183 - 204
Published on: Mar 20, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2020 Justyna Wawrzyniuk, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.