Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Do All Eagles Fly High? The Generic Overgeneralization Effect: The Impact of Fillers in Truth Value Judgment Tasks Cover

Do All Eagles Fly High? The Generic Overgeneralization Effect: The Impact of Fillers in Truth Value Judgment Tasks

Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. Behrens, L. (2005). Genericity from a cross-linguistic perspective. <em>Linguistics</em>, <em>43</em>(2), 275–344.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.2.275" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/ling.2005.43.2.275</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  2. Carlson, G. N., &amp; Pelletier, F. J. (Eds.). (1995). <em>The generic book</em>. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  3. Gasz, A. (2013). <em>Zarys gramatyki uogólnień na materiale aforyzmów (ujęcie polskorosyjskie)</em>. Katowice, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
  4. Gelman, S. A. (2003). <em>The essential child. Origins of essentialims in everyday thought</em>. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195154061.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  5. Gelman, S. A. (2004). Learning words for kinds: Generic noun phrases in acquisition. In D. G. Hall &amp; S. R. Waxman (Eds.), <em>Weaving a lexicon</em> (pp. 445–484). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7185.003.0018" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7551/mitpress/7185.003.0018</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  6. Gelman, S. A., Goetz, P. J., Sarnecka, B. W., &amp; Flukes, J. (2008). Generic language in parent-child conversations. <em>Language Learning and Development</em>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440701542625" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440701542625</a>">https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440701542625</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15475440701542625" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/15475440701542625</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  7. Grzegorczykowa, R. (2001). <em>Wprowadzenie do semantyki językoznawczej</em>. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
  8. Hollander, M. A., Gelman, S. A., &amp; Star, J. (2002). Children’s interpretation of generic noun phrases. <em>Developmental Psychology</em>, <em>38</em>(6), 883–894. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0012–1649.38.6.883" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1037/0012–1649.38.6.883</a>">https://doi.org/10.1037/0012–1649.38.6.883</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.883" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0012-1649.38.6.883</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  9. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. <em>American Economic Review</em>, <em>93</em>(5), 1449–1475.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803322655392" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1257/000282803322655392</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  10. Karczewski, D. (2016). <em>Generyczność w języku i w myśleniu. Studium kognitywne</em>. Kraków, Poland: Universitas.
  11. Karczewski, D., &amp; Wajda, E. (2015). Perceptions of different syntactic forms of generics: An experimental study. <em>Białostockie Archiwum Językowe</em>, <em>15</em>, 233–245.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.15290/baj.2015.15.15" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.15290/baj.2015.15.15</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  12. Karczewski, D., Wajda, E., &amp; Poniat, R. (forthcoming). Do all storks fly to Africa? Universal statements and the generic overgeneralization effect. <em>Lingua</em>.
  13. Khemlani, S., Leslie, S., Glucksberg, S., &amp; Fernandez, P. R. (2007). Do ducks lay eggs? How people interpret generic assertions. <em>Proceedings of the 29th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society</em>, 395–401. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1574" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1574</a>">https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1574</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1574" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/ijfe.1574</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  14. Kiklewicz, A. (2004). <em>Podstawy składni funkcjonalnej</em>. Olsztyn, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego.
  15. Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., ter Meulen, A., Link, G., &amp; Chierchia, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G. N. Carlson &amp; F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), <em>The generic book</em>. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  16. Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D. (2019). Genericity. In C. Cummins &amp; N. Katsos (Eds.), <em>The Oxford handbook of experimental semantics and pragmatics</em> (pp. 156–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  17. Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., &amp; Stockall, L. (2013). Genericity, exceptions and domain restriction: experimental evidence from comparison with universals. In E. Chemla, V. Homer, &amp; G. Winterstein (Eds.), <em>Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17</em> (pp. 325–342). Paris:École Normale Supérieure.
  18. Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., Stockall, L., &amp; Katsos, N. (2017). A new look at the ‘Generic Overgeneralisation’ effect. <em>Inquiry</em>, <em>3923</em> (February), 1–27. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1285993" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1285993</a>">https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1285993</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1285993" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/0020174X.2017.1285993</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  19. Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D., Stockall, L., &amp; Katsos, N. (2019). Contextualising generic and universal generalisations: Quantifier domain restriction and the generic overgeneralisation effect. <em>Journal of Semantics</em>, (October), 617–664. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffz009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffz009</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffz009</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffz009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/jos/ffz009</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  20. Leslie, S.-J. (2007). Generics and the structure of the mind. <em>Philosophical Perspectives</em>, <em>21</em>(1), 375–403. Retrieved from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://about.jstor.org/terms">https://about.jstor.org/terms</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00138.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00138.x</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  21. Leslie, S.-J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. <em>Philosophical Review</em>, <em>117</em>(1), 1–47. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023</a>">https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1215/00318108-2007-023</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  22. Leslie, S.-J. (2012). Generics articulate default generalizations. <em>Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes</em>, <em>41</em>, 25–44. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.2048" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.2048</a>">https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.2048</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.2048" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4000/rlv.2048</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  23. Leslie, S.-J., Khemlani, S., &amp; Glucksberg, S. (2011). Do all ducks lay eggs? The generic overgeneralization effect. <em>Journal of Memory and Language</em>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.005</a>">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.005</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.005</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  24. Mari, A., Beyssade, C., &amp; del Prete, F. (Eds.). (2013). <em>Genericity</em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691807.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691807.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  25. Nickel, B. (2008). Generics and the ways of normality. <em>Linguistics and Philosophy</em>, <em>31</em>(6), 629–648. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7</a>">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  26. Pelletier, F. J., &amp; Asher, N. (1997). Generics and defaults. In J. van Benthem &amp; A. ter Meulen (Eds.), <em>Handbook of logic and language</em> (pp. 1125–1179). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd</a>">https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  27. Prasada, S., Khemlani, S., Leslie, S. J., &amp; Glucksberg, S. (2013). Conceptual distinctions amongst generics. <em>Cognition</em>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010</a>">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
  28. Smólska, J., &amp; Rusiecki, J. (1980). The generic noun phrase in English and Polish. <em>Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics</em>, 1–10.
  29. Stanley, J., &amp; Szabó, Z. G. (2000). On quantifier domain restriction. <em>Mind and Language</em>, <em>15</em> (June), 219–261.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00130" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/1468-0017.00130</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 147 - 162
Published on: Mar 20, 2020
Published by: University of Bialystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2020 Edyta Wajda, Daniel Karczewski, published by University of Bialystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.