The Logic and Normative Force of Dual-Character Generics: Towards a Theoretical Model for the Study of Normatively Shifted Predications
References
- Bicchieri, C. (2006). The grammar of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the wild. How to diagnose, measure, and change social norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bicchieri, C., Muldoon, R., & Sontuoso, A. (2018). Social Norms. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/social-norms/.
- Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R. E., & Southwood, N. (2013). Explaining norms. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.0001</a>
- Burton-Roberts, N. (1977). Generic sentences and analyticity. Studies in Language, 1, 155–196.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.1.2.02bur" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/sl.1.2.02bur</a>
- Carlson, G. N. (1995), Truth conditions of generic sentences: Two contrasting views. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 224–238). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Carlson, G. N. (2005), Generics, habituals and iteratives.In A. Barber (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00256-X" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00256-X</a>
- Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1), 591–62.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015</a>
- Cohen, A. (2001). On the generic use of indefinite singulars. Journal of Semantics, 18(3), 183–209.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/18.3.183" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/jos/18.3.183</a>
- Cohen, A. (2005). More than bare existence: An implication of existential bare plurals. Journal of Semantics, 23, 381–400.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffh031" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/jos/ffh031</a>
- Del Pinal, G. & Reuter, K. (2017). Dual character concepts in social cognition: Commitments and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognitive Science, 41, 477–501. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12456.10.1111/cogs.12456" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12456.10.1111/cogs.12456</a>
- Gaymard, S. (2016). Conditionality and normative models in the field of social thinking. In: K.J. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Social Roles and Social Norms (pp. 1–11). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
- Gordon, M. It’s not a compliment to say a courageous girl ‘has balls’. Retrieved from https://www.momtastic.com/parenting/687185-not-compliment-to-say-a-courageous-girl-balls/
- Greenberg, Y. (2003). Manifestations of genericity. New York: Routledge.
- Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Haslanger, S. (2010). Resisting reality: Social construction and social critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Haslanger, S. (2014). The normal, the natural and the good: Generics and ideology. Politica & Societa, 3, 365–392.
- Karczewski, D. (2016). Generyczność w języku i myśleniu. Studium kognitywne. Kraków, Poland: Universitas.
- Knobe, J., & Prasada, S. (2011). Dual character concepts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 2965–2970). Boston, MA: Cognitive Science Society. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f60b/2d25367883d3f238925297eb4a263269be77.pdf?ga=2.46186663.122938527.1580650406-64654011.1580305066.
- Knobe, J., Prasada, S., & Newman, G. (2013). Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognition, 127, 242–257.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005</a>
- Khalidi, M. A. (2013). Kinds (natural kinds vs. human kinds). In B. Kaldis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of philosophy and the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G., ter Meulen, A., Link, G., & Chierchia, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 1–125). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Lawler, J. (1973). Studies in English generics (Doctoral dissertation). Reprinted in University of Michigan Papers in Linguistics 1(1). Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~jlawler/generics.html
- Lavin, A. (2019). The explanatory link account of normality. Philosophy, 94(4), pp. 597–619. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819119000317.10.1017/S0031819119000317" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819119000317.10.1017/S0031819119000317</a>
- Leslie, S.-J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review, 117(1), 1–49.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1215/00318108-2007-023</a>
- Leslie, S.-J. (2012). Generics. In G. Russell & D. Graff Fara (Eds.), Routledge companion to philosophy of language (pp. 355–366). London: Routledge.
- Leslie, S.-J. (2015). Hillary Clinton is the only man in the Obama administration: Dual character concepts, generics, and gender. Analytic Philosophy, 56(2), 111–141.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12063" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/phib.12063</a>
- Leslie, S.-J. (2017). The original sin of cognition: Fear, prejudice, and generalization. Journal of Philosophy, 114(8), 393–421.<a href="https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2017114828" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5840/jphil2017114828</a>
- Leslie, S.-J. (forthcoming). ‘Real men’: Polysemy or implicature. Analytic Philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.princeton.edu/~sjleslie/Real%20Men%20Polysemy%20or%20Implicature%20final.pdf.
- Merriam-Webster dictionary. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
- Nickel, B. (2008). Generics and the ways of normality. Linguistics and Philosophy, 33(6), 629–648.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7</a>
- Nickel, B. (2016). Between logic and the world: An integrated theory of generics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640003.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640003.001.0001</a>
- Olubiński, A. (1990). Rola społeczna a procesy socjalizacji i wychowania. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny, 45(2), 267–284.
- Petit, P. (1999). A theory of normal and ideal conditions. Philosophical Studies, 96, 21–44.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004225605930" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1023/A:1004225605930</a>
- Prasada, S., Dillingham, E. M. (2006). Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition, 99(1), 73–112.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.cognition.2005.01.003</a>
- Prasada, S., Dillingham, E. M. (2009). Representation of principled connections: A window onto the formal aspect of common sense conception. Cognitive Science, 33, 401–448.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01018.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01018.x</a>
- Prasada, S. (2010). Conceptual representations and some forms of genericity. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff: Mass terms and generics. New Directions in Cognitive Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Prasada, S., Khemlani, S., Leslie, S.-J., & Glucksberg, S. (2013). Conceptual distinctions amongst generics. Cognition, 126, 405–422.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.010</a>
- Prentice, D. A., Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243–256.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243</a>
- Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Penguin Books.
- Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world. The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195396171.001.0001</a>
- Znaniecki, F. (1965). Social relations and social roles. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.
Language: English
Page range: 113 - 126
Published on: Mar 20, 2020
Published by: University of Bialystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Aleksandra Kowalewska-Buraczewska, published by University of Bialystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.