The Interplay of Syntactic and Lexical Salience and its Effect on Default Figurative Responses
By:
References
- Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639</a>
- Bergen, B. K. (2012). Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York: Basic Books.
- Chafe, W. (1994). Discourse, consciousness and time: The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Charteris-Black, J. (2012). Shattering the bell jar: Metaphor, gender and depression. Metaphor and symbol, 27(3), 199–216.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2012.665796" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/10926488.2012.665796</a>
- Coulson, S. (2008). Metaphor comprehension and the brain. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 177–194). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Coulson, S., & van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: an event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition, 30(6), 958–968.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195780" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3758/BF03195780</a>
- Coulson, S., & Lai, V. T. (2015). The metaphorical brain. Lausanne: Frontiers Media.
- Divjak, D. (2015). Exploring the grammar of perception. A case study using data from Russian. Functions of Language, 22(1), 44–68.
- Faucett, J. M., Risco, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2015). The handbook of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<a href="https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10033.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7551/mitpress/10033.001.0001</a>
- Gentner, D., Bowdle, B. F., Wolff, P., & Boronat, C. (2001). Metaphor is like analogy. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak & B. N. Kokinov (Eds.), The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science (pp. 199–253). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Gibbs, R. W. (1992). Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review, 99, 572–577.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.572" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0033-295X.99.3.572</a>
- Gibbs, R. W., & Matlock, T. (2008). Metaphor, imagination, and simulation: Psycholinguistic evidence. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 161–176). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Giora, R. (1999). On the priority of salient meanings: Studies of literal and figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 919–929.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00100-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00100-3</a>
- Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Giora, R., & Fein, O. (1999). Irony: Context and salience. Metaphor and Symbol, 14(4), 241–257.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1404_1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1207/S15327868MS1404_1</a>
- Giora, R., Givoni, S., & Fein, O. (2015). Defaultness reigns: The case of sarcasm. Metaphor and Symbol, 30(4), 290–313.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2015.1074804" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/10926488.2015.1074804</a>
- Giora, R., Jaffe, I., Becker, I., & Fein, O. (2018). Strongly mitigating a highly positive concept: The case of default sarcastic interpretations. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 6(1), 19–47.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00002.gio" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/rcl.00002.gio</a>
- Givón, T. (1987). Beyond foreground and background. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 175–168). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Glucksberg, S., Gildea, P., & Bookin, H. B. (1982). On understanding non-literal speech: Can people ignore metaphors? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1, 85–96.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/S0022-5371(82)90467-4</a>
- Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97(1), 3–18.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3</a>
- Gold, R., & Faust, M. (2010). Right hemisphere dysfunction and metaphor comprehension in young adults with Asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(7), 800–811.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0930-1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10803-009-0930-1</a>
- Golubkova, E. E. (2014). Ispolzovaniye lingvisticheskih korpusov pri reshenii semanticheskikh problem. In V. I. Zabotkina & E. E. Golubkova (Eds.), Metody kognitivnogo analiza semantiki slova: Komputerno-korpusnyi podkhod (pp. 34–75). Moscow: Yazyki Slavianskoi Kultury. (In Russ.).
- Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A. (Eds.) (2006). Corpora in cognitive linguistics: Corpus-based approaches to syntax and lexis. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197709" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/9783110197709</a>
- Hetmański, M. (2015). Metaphoric confinement of information. Studies in Logic, Grammar, and Rhetoric, 40(53), 161–178.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2015-0009" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/slgr-2015-0009</a>
- Iakimova, G., Passerioux, C., Denhière, G., Laurent, J.-P., Vistoli, D., Vilain, J., & Hardy-Baylé, M.-C. (2010). The influence of idiomatic salience during the comprehension of ambiguous idioms by patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 177(1–2), 46–54.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2010.02.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.psychres.2010.02.005</a>
- Iriskhanova, O. (2014). Igry fokusa v yazyke: Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya. Moscow: Yazyki Slavianskoi Kultury. (In Russ.).
- Kauschke, C., Mueller, N., Kircher, T., & Nagels, A. (2018). Do patients with depression prefer literal or metaphorical expressions for internal states? Evidence from sentence completion and elicited production. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, Article 1326.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01326" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01326</a>
- Kazmerski, V. A., Blasko, D. G., & Dessalegn, B. G. (2003). ERP and behavioral evidence of individual differences in metaphor comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 673–689.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196107" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3758/BF03196107</a>
- Kiose, M. (2018). Factors of co-referent indirect names interpretation in text: Cognitive analysis – statistics – experiment. Issues in Cognitive Linguistics (Voprosy kognitivnoy lingvistiki), 3, 16–26. (In Russ.).<a href="https://doi.org/10.20916/1812-3228-2018-3-16-26" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.20916/1812-3228-2018-3-16-26</a>
- Kintsch, W., & Bowles, A. (2002). Metaphor comprehension: What makes a metaphor difficult to understand? Metaphor and Symbol, 17(4), 249–262.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1704_1" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1207/S15327868MS1704_1</a>
- Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading. The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35.
- MacKay, G., & Shaw, A. (2004). A comparative study of figurative language in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20, 13–32.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1191/0265659004ct261oa" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1191/0265659004ct261oa</a>
- National corpus of the Russian language. Retrieved from http://www.ruscorpora.ru/
- Norbury, C. F. (2005). The relationship between theory of mind and metaphor: Evidence from children with language impairment and autistic spectrum disorder. Developmental Psychology, 23(3), 383–399.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X26732" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1348/026151005X26732</a>
- Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F.-H., & Poli, J. (1996). The time-course of metaphor comprehension: an event-related potential study. Brain and Language, 316, 293–316.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0107" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1006/brln.1996.0107</a>
- Rapp, A. M., Felsenheimer, A. K., Langohr, K., & Klupp, M. (2017). The comprehension of familiar and novel metaphoric meanings in schizophrenia: A pilot study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2251.
- Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124(3), 372–422.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372</a>
- Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Ritchie, D. (2013). Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139136822" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9781139136822</a>
- Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010). The atypical development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children with autism. Autism, 14, 29–46.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361309340667" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/1362361309340667</a>
- Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004). Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge.<a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203494073" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4324/9780203494073</a>
- Schmid, H.-J. (2007). Entrenchment, salience, and basic levels. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 117–138). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Staub, A. (2015). Reading sentences: Syntactic parsing and semantic interpretation. In A. Pollatsek & R. Treiman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of reading (pp. 202–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Steen, G., Dorst, A. G., Herrmann, J. B., Kaal, A. A., Krennmayr, T., & Pasma, T. (2010). A method for linguistic metaphor identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/celcr.14</a>
- Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Vol. 1. Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
- Tomlin, R. S. (1987). Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In R. S. Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse (pp. 455–479). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
- Tognini-Bonelli, E. (2001). Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/scl.6</a>
- Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. In A. Tversky & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Verhagen, A. (2007). Construal and perspectivization. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 48–81). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Vulchanova, M., Saldańa, D., Chahboun, S., & Vulchanov, V. (2015). Figurative language processing in atypical populations: the ASD perspective. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, Article 24.<a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00024" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3389/fnhum.2015.00024</a>
- Wårwik, B. (2004). What is foregrounded in narratives? Hypotheses for the cognitive basis of foregrounding. In T. Virtanen (Ed.), Approaches to cognition through text and discourse (pp. 99–122). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Language: English
Page range: 69 - 88
Published on: Mar 20, 2020
Published by: University of Bialystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Maria Kiose, published by University of Bialystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.