Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Normative Generics and Norm Breaching – A Questionnaire-Based Study of Parent-Child Interactions in English Cover

Normative Generics and Norm Breaching – A Questionnaire-Based Study of Parent-Child Interactions in English

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 61 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
By:
Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. Andres, L. (2012). <em>Designing and doing survey research</em>. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402202" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4135/9781526402202</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Bicchieri, C. (2006). <em>The grammar of society: The nature and dynamics of social norms</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616037" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616037</a>">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616037</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616037" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511616037</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bolinger, D. (1989). <em>Intonation and its uses</em>. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503623125" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/9781503623125</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984). <em>Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste</em>. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357</a>">https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315775357" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4324/9781315775357</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Brennan, G., Eriksson, L., Goodin, R. E., &amp; Southwood, N. (2013). <em>Explaining norms</em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.0001</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.0001</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654680.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Brożek, B. (2012). <em>Normatywność prawa</em>. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer Polska.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Carlson, G. N., &amp; Pelletier, F. J. (Eds.). (1995). <em>The generic book</em>. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Cohen, A. (1999). <em>Think generic: The meaning and use of generic sentences</em>. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Cohen, A. (2001). On the generic use of indefinite singulars. <em>Journal of Semantics</em>, <em>18</em>(1), 183–209. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/18.3.183" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/18.3.183</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/18.3.183</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/18.3.183" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/jos/18.3.183</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Fischer, R., Karl, J. A., &amp; Fischer, M. V. (2019). Norms across cultures: A cross-cultural meta-analysis of norms effects in the theory of planned behavior. <em>Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology</em>, <em>50</em>(10), 1112–1126. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119846409" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119846409</a>">https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119846409</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119846409" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0022022119846409</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Fitch, K. L., &amp; Sanders, R. E. (Eds.). (2005). <em>Handbook of language and social interaction</em>. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Geary, D. C. (2010). <em>Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences</em>. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/12072-000" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1037/12072-000</a>">https://doi.org/10.1037/12072-000</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1037/12072-000" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1037/12072-000</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Gelman, S. A. (2010). Generics as a window onto young children’s concepts. In F. J. Pelletier (Ed.), <em>Kinds, things, and stuff: The cognitive side of generics and mass terms</em> (pp. 100–122). New York: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195382891.003.0006" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195382891.003.0006</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Ghazizadeh, A., Griggs, W., &amp; Hikosaka, O. (2016). Ecological origins of object salience: Reward, uncertainty, aversiveness, and novelty. <em>Frontiers in Neuro-science</em>, <em>10</em>, 378.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2016.00378" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3389/fnins.2016.00378</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Giora, R. (2003). <em>On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language</em>. New York: Oxford University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195136166.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Glüer, K., &amp; Wikforss, Å. (2018). The normativity of meaning and content. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), <em>Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy</em>. Retrieved from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/meaning-normativity/">https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/meaning-normativity/</ext-link>.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Hesni, S. (2019). <em>Normative discourse and social negotiation</em>. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783414100321" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783414100321</a>">https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783414100321</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063783414100321" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1134/S1063783414100321</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Hoffmann, T., &amp; Trousdale, G. (Eds.). (2013). <em>The Oxford handbook of construction grammar</em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Huddleston, R., &amp; Pullum, G. K. (2002). <em>The Cambridge grammar of the English language</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3738393" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.2307/3738393</a>">https://doi.org/10.2307/3738393</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3738393" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/3738393</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Itkonen, E. (2008). The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In J. Zlatev, T.P. Racine, C. Sinha &amp; E. Itkonen (Eds.), <em>The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity</em> (pp. 279–305). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.16itk" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.16itk</a>">https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.16itk</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.16itk" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/celcr.12.16itk</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Kahneman, D. (2011). <em>Thinking, fast and slow</em>. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Knobe, J., Prasada, S., &amp; Newman, G. E. (2013). Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. <em>Cognition</em>, <em>127</em>(2), 242–257. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005</a>">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). <em>The sources of normativity</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511554476" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511554476</a>">https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511554476</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511554476" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511554476</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Krifka, M., Pelletier, F. J., Carlson, G. N., terMeulen, A., Link, G., &amp; Chierchia, G. (1995). Genericity: An introduction. In G. N. Carlson &amp; F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), <em>The generic book</em> (pp. 1–124). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Langacker, R. W. (1997). Generics and habituals. In A. Athanasiadou &amp; R. Dirven (Eds.), <em>On conditionals again</em> (pp. 191–222). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.143.11lan" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/cilt.143.11lan</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Langacker, R. W. (1999). Generic constructions. In <em>Grammar and conceptualization</em> (pp. 247–260). Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Lazaridou-Chatzigoga, D. (2019). Genericity. In C. Cummins &amp; N. Katsos (Eds.), <em>The Oxford handbook of experimental semantics and pragmatics</em> (pp. 156–177). Oxford: Oxford University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.12</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Leslie, S.-J. (2007). Generics and the structure of the mind. <em>Philosophical perspectives</em>, <em>21</em>(1), 375–403.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00138.x" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00138.x</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Leslie, S.-J. (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. <em>Philosophical Review</em>, <em>117</em>(1), 1–47. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023</a>">https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2007-023" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1215/00318108-2007-023</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Leslie, S.-J. (2012). Generics articulate default generalizations. <em>Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes</em>, <em>41</em>, 25–44. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.2048" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.2048</a>">https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.2048</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4000/rlv.2048" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4000/rlv.2048</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Leslie, S.-J. (2015). “Hillary Clinton is the only man in the Obama administration”: Dual character concepts, generics, and gender. <em>Analytic Philosophy</em>, <em>56</em>(2), 111–141. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12063" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12063</a>">https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12063</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12063" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/phib.12063</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Littlemore, J. (2015). <em>Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814</a>">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107338814" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9781107338814</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Mäkilähde, A., Leppänen, V., &amp; Itkonen, E. (Eds.). (2019). <em>Norms and normativity in language and linguistics</em>. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.01mak" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.01mak</a>">https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.01mak</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.01mak" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/slcs.209.01mak</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. McConnell-Ginet, S. (2012). Generic predicates and interest-relativity. <em>The Canadian Journal of Linguistics</em> / <em>La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique</em>, <em>57</em>(2), 261–287. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1353/cjl.2012.0028" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1353/cjl.2012.0028</a>">https://doi.org/10.1353/cjl.2012.0028</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1353/cjl.2012.0028" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1353/cjl.2012.0028</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (2009). Food taboos: Their origins and purposes. <em>Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine</em>, <em>5</em>, 1–10. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-5-18" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-5-18</a>">https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-5-18</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-5-18" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1186/1746-4269-5-18</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Nickel, B. (2008). Generics and the ways of normality. <em>Linguistics and Philosophy</em>, <em>31</em>(6), 629–648. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7</a>">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/s10988-008-9049-7</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Nickel, B. (2016). <em>Between logic and the world: An integrated theory of generics</em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640003.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199640003.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Nuyts, J., Byloo, P., &amp; Diepeveen, J. (2010). On deontic modality, directivity, and mood: The case of Dutch <em>mogen</em> and <em>moeten</em>. <em>Journal of Pragmatics</em>, <em>42</em>(1), 16–34. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012</a>">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.pragma.2009.05.012</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. O’Neill, E. (2017). Kinds of norms. <em>Philosophy compass</em>, <em>12</em>(5), e12416. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12416" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12416</a>">https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12416</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12416" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/phc3.12416</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Paulus, M., &amp; Schmidt, M. F. H. (2018). The early development of the normative mind. <em>Journal of Experimental Child Psychology</em>, <em>165</em>, 1–6. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.011" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.011</a>">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.011</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.011" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.011</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Pelletier, F. J., &amp; Asher, N. (1997). Generics and defaults. In J. van Benthem &amp; A. ter Meulen (Eds.), <em>Handbook of logic and language</em> (pp. 1125–1179). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd</a>">https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181822ebd</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Pilcher, J. M. (Ed.). (2012). <em>The Oxford handbook of food history</em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2016.1143720" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2016.1143720</a>">https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2016.1143720</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2016.1143720" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/15528014.2016.1143720</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Radden, G. (2009). Generic reference in English. A metonymic and conceptual blending theory. In K.-U. Panther, L. T. Thornburg &amp; A. Barcelona (Eds.), <em>Metonymy and metaphor in grammar</em> (pp. 199–228). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.25.13rad" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1075/hcp.25.13rad</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Schmid, H.-J., &amp; Günther, F. (2016). Toward a unified socio-cognitive framework for salience in language. <em>Frontiers in Psychology</em>, <em>7</em>, 1110.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01110</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Schmidt, M. F. H., &amp; Rakoczy, H. (2018). Developing an understanding of normativity. In A. Newen, L. De Bruin &amp; S. Gallagher (Eds.), <em>The Oxford handbook of cognition: Embodied, embedded, enactive and extended</em> (pp. 685–706). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.36" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.36</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.36</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.36" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.36</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Shackelford, T. K., &amp; Weekes-Shackelford, V. A. (Eds.). (2012). <em>The Oxford handbook of evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war</em>. New York: Oxford University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.001.0001</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.001.0001</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199738403.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Sidnell, J. (Ed.). (2010). <em>Conversation analysis</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670</a>">https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635670" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511635670</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Star, D. (Ed.). (2018). <em>The Oxford handbook of reasons and normativity</em>. Oxford: Oxford University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.001.0001</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.001.0001</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Turiel, E. (2008). Thought about actions in social domains: Morality, social conventions, and social interactions. <em>Cognitive Development</em>, <em>23</em>(1), 136–154. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.04.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.04.001</a>">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.04.001</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.04.001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1016/j.cogdev.2007.04.001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Wedgwood, R. (2018). The unity of normativity. In D. Star (Ed.), <em>The Oxford handbook of reasons and normativity</em> (pp. 23–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.2</a>">https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.2</ext-link><dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.2" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.2</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Young, P. (2003). The power of norms. In P. Hammerstein (Ed.), <em>Genetic and cultural evolution of cooperation</em> (pp. 389–399). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3232.003.0022" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7551/mitpress/3232.003.0022</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2020-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 49 - 68
Published on: Mar 20, 2020
Published by: University of Bialystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
genericity,
normativity,
normative generics,
normative force,
norms
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2020 Daniel Karczewski, Marcin Trojszczak, published by University of Bialystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 61 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)Next article