References
- Adler, J. (2013). Are conductive arguments possible? Argumentation 27: 245-257.10.1007/s10503-012-9286-3
- Blair, J. A. (2016). A defence of conduction: a reply to Adler. Argumentation 30(2): 109-128.10.1007/s10503-015-9368-0
- Blair, J. A. & Johnson, R.H. (eds.). (2011). Conductive argument: an overlooked type of defeasible reasoning. London: College Publications.
- Botting, D. (forthcoming). The fallacy of sweeping generalization. Presented at the 20th NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation in Alta, Utah, U.S.A on 20th to 23rd July 2017. In Winkler C. (ed.) Networking Argument, Selected Papers from the 20th Biennial Conference on Argumentation (forthcoming), National Communication Association.
- Botting, D. (2012). Wellman’s typology of arguments. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 28(41): 23-43.
- Engel, S. M. (1976). With good reason: an introduction to the informal fallacies. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
- Hursthouse, R. (1995). Fallacies and moral dilemmas. Argumentation 9: 617-632.10.1007/BF00737782
- Stocker, M. (1992). Dirty hands and conflicts of values and of desires in Aristotle’s Ethics. In Plural and Conflicting Values. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 51-84.10.1093/0198240554.003.0004
- Watson, G. (2004a). Responsibility and the limits of evil. In Agency and answerability, 219-259. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272273.003.0009
- Watson, G. (2004b). Two faces of responsibility. In Agency and answerability, 260-288. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199272273.003.0010
- Wellman, C. (1971). Challenge and response: justification in ethics. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.