Ad Hominem Arguments, Rhetoric, and Science Communication
References
- Anderson, T. 2017. Communicating science-based messages on vaccines. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 95, 670-671.
- Black, S., Rappuoli R. 2010. A Crisis of Public Confidence in Vaccines. Science Translational Medicine 2(61), 61mr1.
- Ceccarelli, L. 2011. Manufactured Scientific Controversy: Science, Rhetoric, and Public Debate. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 14(2), 195-228.
- Collins, H. 2010. Tacit and explicit knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Collins, H., Evans, R. 2008. Rethinking expertise. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Daemmrich, A. 2002. A tale of two experts: thalidomide and political engagement in the United States and West Germany. Social History of Medicine 15(1), 137-158.10.1093/shm/15.1.137
- Davies, P., Chapman, S., Leask, J. 2002. Antivaccination activists on the world wide web. Archives of disease in childhood 87(1), 22-25.
- Derkatch, C. 2016. Bounding Biomedicine. Evidence and Rhetoric in the New Science of Alternative Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Dubé, E., Laberge, C., Guay, M., Bramadat, P., Roy, R., Bettinger, J.A. 2013. Vaccine hesitancy. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 9(8), 1763-1773.
- Flaherty, D.K. 2011. The vaccine-autism connection: a public health crisis caused by unethical medical practices and fraudulent science. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 45(10), 1302-1304.
- Freudenburg, W.R., Gramling R., Davidson, D.J. 2008. Scientific certainty argumentation methods (SCAMs): science and the politics of doubt. Sociological Inquiry 78(1), 2-38.10.1111/j.1475-682X.2008.00219.x
- Galilei, G. 1638 [2010] Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences. Henry Crew (translation). Cosimo Classics.
- Goldman, A. 2001. Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63, 85-110.
- Goodwin, J., Honeycutt, L. 2009. When Science Goes Public: from Technical Arguments to Appeals to Authority. Studies in Communication Sciences 9(2), 19-30.
- Greene, J.A. 2007. Pharmaceutical marketing research and the prescribing physician. Annals of Internal Medicine 146(10), 742-748.
- Jacobs, S. 2000. Rhetoric and dialectic from the standpoint of normative pragmatics. Argumentation 14(3), 261-286.
- Jackson, S. 2008. Predicaments of politicization in the debate over abstinenceonly sex education. In van Eemeren, F. H. & Garssen B. (Eds.) Controversy, confrontation: Relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 215-230.
- Kazan, O. 2017. The Shadow Network of Anti-Vax Doctors. The Atlantic, January 18, 2017. URL: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/01/when-the-doctor-is-a-vaccine-skeptic/513383/ (Accessed 27 July 2018).
- Martini, C. 2015. Expertise and institutional design in economic committees. Journal of Economic Methodology 22:3, 391-409.
- Okuhara, T., Ishikawa, H., Okada, M., Kato, M., Kiuchi, T. 2017. Readability comparison of pro-and anti-HPV-vaccination online messages in Japan. Patient Education and Counseling 100(10), 1859-1866.
- Oreskes, N. 2004. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 306(5702), 1686-1686.
- Oreskes, N., Conway, E. M. 2010. Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Reiss, J. 2007. Error in Economics: Towards a More Evidence-Based Methodology. London: Routledge.
- Russell, N. 2009. Communicating Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Settle, T.B. 1983. Galileo and early experimentation. In Aris, R., Davis, H. T., Stuewer, R. H. (Eds.) Springs of Scientific Creativity. Essays on Founders of Modern Science. University of Minnesota Press, 3-20.
- Shanteau, J. 1992. The psychology of experts an alternative view. In Wright, G., Bolger F. (Eds.) Expertise and Decision Support. New York: Plenum Press, 11-23.
- Shanteau, J., Weiss, D. J., Thomas, R. P., Pounds, J. C. 2002. Performance-Based Assessment of Expertise: How to Decide If Someone Is an Expert or Not. European Journal of Operational Research 136(2), 253-263.
- Taylor, L.E., Swerdfeger, A.L., Eslick, G.D. 2014. Vaccines are not associated with autism: an evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine 32(29), 3623-3629.
- Tomljenovic L., Christopher A.S. 2015. Answers to common misconceptions regarding the toxicity of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines. In Shoenfeld Y., Agmon-Levin N., Tomljenovic L. (Eds.). Vaccines and autoimmunity. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, 43-56.
- Walton, D. 1989. Reasoned use of expertise in argumentation. Argumentation 3, 59-73.
- Walton, D. 1997. Appeal to Expert Opinion. Arguments from Authority. University Park: Penn State University Press.
- Walton, D. 2002. Informal Logic. A Pragmatic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Walton, D., Godden, D.M. 2005. The Nature and Status of Critical Questions in Argumentation Schemes. OSSA Conference Archive, 56 URL: https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/ossaarchive/OSSA6/papers/56 (Accessed 27 July 2018).
Language: English
Page range: 151 - 166
Published on: Dec 6, 2018
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2018 Carlo Martini, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.