Witness Impeachment in Cross-Examination Using Ad Hominem Argumentation
References
- Aristotle (1939). Topics (trans. E. S. Forster). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Bench-Capon, T. J.M., Doutre, S. and Dunne, P. E. (2008). Asking the Right Question: Forcing Commitment in Examination Dialogues. Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, ed. P. Besnard, S. Doutre and A. Hunter. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 49-60.
- Budzynska, K. and Reed, C. (2012). The Structure of Ad Hominem Dialogues. Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2012. ed. B. Verheij, S. Szeider and S. Woltran. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 410-421 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, Vol. 245).
- Budzynska, K. and Witek, M. (2014). Non-Inferential Aspects of Ad Hominem and Ad Baculum, Argumentation, 28 (3), 301-315.
- Dunne, P. E., Doutre, S. and Bench-Capon, T. J. M. (2005). Discovering Inconsistency through Examination Dialogues. In: Proceedings IJCAI-05 (International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence), Edinburgh, 1560-1561.
- Gordon, T. F. and Walton, D. (2009). Legal Reasoning with Argumentation Schemes, 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, ed. Carole D. Hafner, New York, Association for Computing Machinery, 2009, 137-146.
- Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation, Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, ed. P. Cole and J. L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press, 1975, 43-58.
- Hamblin, C. L. (1970). Fallacies. London: Methuen.
- Hamblin, C. L. (1971). Mathematical Models of Dialogue. Theoria, 37(2), 130-155.10.1111/j.1755-2567.1971.tb00065.x
- Harary, F. (1972). Graph Theory. Menlo Park: Addison-Wesley.
- Krabbe, E. C. W. (2013). Topical Roots of Formal Dialectic, Argumentation, 27(1), 71-87.
- Levy, E. J. (2011). Examination of Witnesses in Criminal Cases. Toronto: Thomson Reuters.
- Macagno, F. and Walton, D. (2012). Character Attacks as Complex Strategies of Legal Argumentation, International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse, 2(3), 59-117.
- F. Macagno and D. Walton (2013). Implicatures as Forms of Argument, Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy, ed. A. Capone et al. Berlin: Springer, 203-224.
- MacCarthy, T. F. (2007). MacCarthy on Cross-Examination. Chicago: American Bar Association.
- MacCarthy, T. F., MacCarthy, S. P. and MacCarthy, T. F., Honorable (2016). MacCarthy on Impeachment. Chicago: American Bar Association, 2016.
- Mauet, T. A. (2005). Trials: Strategy, Skills, and the New Powers of Persuasion. New York: Aspen Publishers.
- Poole, D. L. and Macworth, A. K. (2011). Artificial Intelligence: Foundations of Computational Agents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Prakken, H. (2010). An Abstract Framework for Argumentation with Structured Arguments. Argument and Computation 1, 93-124.
- Prakken, H. (2011). An Overview of Formal models of Argumentation and their Application in Philosophy. Studies in Logic, 4(1), (2011): 65-86. http://www.cs.uu.nl/groups/IS/archive/henry/china11.pdf.
- Reed, C. (2011). Implicit Speech Acts Are Ubiquitous. Why? They Join the Dots, Zenker, F. (ed.). Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-21, 2011. Windsor, ON (CD ROM), 1-15.
- Robinson, R. (1953). Plato’s Earlier Dialectic, 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Slomkowski, P. (1997). Aristotle’s Topics, Leiden: Brill.
- Verheij, B. (2003). Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11, 167-195.10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36
- Verheij, B. (2005). Virtual Arguments. On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
- Walton, D. (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
- Walton, D. (2018). Conflict Diagrams for Cross-examination Dialogues, Argumentation and Advocacy, 4(3), 199-218.
- Walton, D., and E. C. W. Krabbe. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Walton, D. and Gordon, T. F. (2015). Formalizing Informal Logic, Informal Logic, 35(4), 2015, 508-538.
- Walton, D. and Gordon, T. F. (2017). Argument Invention with the Carneades Argumentation System, ScriptED: A Journal of Law, Technology and Society, 14(2), 2017, 168-207.
- Walton, D., Reed, C. andMacagno, F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wehr, P. (1979). Conflict Regulation. Boulder: Westview Press.
- Wellman, F. L. (1919). The Art of Cross-Examination, 2nd ed. New York & London: The Macmillan Company.
- Reed, C. (2011). Implicit Speech Acts Are Ubiquitous. Why? They Join the Dots, Zenker, F. (ed.). Argument Cultures: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA), May 18-21, 2011. Windsor, ON (CD ROM), 1-15.
- Robinson, R. (1953). Plato’s Earlier Dialectic, 2nd edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Slomkowski, P. (1997). Aristotle’s Topics, Leiden: Brill.
- Verheij, B. (2003). Dialectical Argumentation with Argumentation Schemes: An Approach to Legal Logic, Artificial Intelligence and Law, 11, 167-195.10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046008.49443.36
- Verheij, B. (2005). Virtual Arguments. On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.
- Walton, D. (1998). Ad Hominem Arguments, Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
- Walton, D. (2018). Conflict Diagrams for Cross-examination Dialogues, Argumentation and Advocacy, 4(3), 199-218.
- Walton, D., and E. C. W. Krabbe. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Walton, D. and Gordon, T. F. (2015). Formalizing Informal Logic, Informal Logic, 35(4), 2015, 508-538.
- Walton, D. and Gordon, T. F. (2017). Argument Invention with the Carneades Argumentation System, ScriptED: A Journal of Law, Technology and Society, 14(2), 2017, 168-207.
- Walton, D., Reed, C. andMacagno, F. (2008). Argumentation Schemes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wehr, P. (1979). Conflict Regulation. Boulder: Westview Press.
- Wellman, F. L. (1919). The Art of Cross-Examination, 2nd ed. New York & London: The Macmillan Company.
Language: English
Page range: 93 - 114
Published on: Dec 6, 2018
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2018 Douglas Walton, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.