Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Norms in Deliberation: The Role of the Principles of Justice and Universalization in Practical Discourses on the Justice of Norms

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Alexy, R. (1978). Theorie der Juristischen Argumentation. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
  2. Alexy, R. (1988). Problems of Discourse Theory. Cr´ıtica 20(58), 43-65.10.22201/iifs.18704905e.1988.656
  3. Alexy, R. (1993). Derecho y Razon Pr´actica. M´exico: Fontamara.
  4. Bermejo-Luque, L. (2011). Giving Reasons: A Linguistic-Pragmatic Approach to Argumentation Theory. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-1761-9
  5. Dancy, J. (2004). Ethics without Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.10.1093/0199270023.001.0001
  6. van Eemeren, F. and Grootendorst, R. (1982). The speech acts of arguing and convincing in externalized discussions. Journal of Pragmatics 6, 1-24.10.1016/0378-2166(82)90036-4
  7. van Eemeren, F. and Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectics Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511616389
  8. Garcia-Carpintero, M. (2011). Constitutive vs. normative accounts of speech and mental acts. In A. Reboul (Ed.), Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan. URL http://www.unige.ch/lettres/philo/mulligan/festschrift/Garcia-Carpintero-paper.pdf (Last accessed, 30 April 2018)
  9. Gauker, C. (1997). Domain of Discourse. Mind 106, 1-32.10.1093/mind/106.421.1
  10. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, T. McCarthy (trans.). Boston: Beacon. [German, 1981]
  11. Habermas, J. (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. C. Lenhardt and S. W. Nicholsen (Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. [German, 1983]
  12. Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. W. Rehg (Trans.). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press. [German, 1992]10.7551/mitpress/1564.001.0001
  13. Kock, C. (2007). Norms of legitimate dissensus. Informal Logic 27, 179-196.10.22329/il.v27i2.474
  14. Lafont, C. (2004). Moral objectivity and reasonable agreement: can realism be reconciled with Kantian constructivism? Ratio Juris 17(1), 27-51.10.1111/j.0952-1917.2004.00253.x
  15. Mason, A. (2009). Justice, Holism and Principles. Res Publica 15, 179-194.10.1007/s11158-009-9087-1
  16. Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [First Edition, 1971]10.4159/9780674042582
  17. Rawls, J. (1980). Kantian Constructivism in Moral Philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy 77(9), 515-572.10.2307/2025790
  18. Rawls, J. (1993). Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
  19. Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. E. Kelly (Ed.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv31xf5v0
  20. Sbisá, M. (2017). Varieties of Norms. In M. Witek and I. Witczak-Plisiecka (Eds.), Normativity and Variety of Speech Actions, to appear. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004366527_003
  21. Toulmin, S. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Updated Edition, 2003].
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0026 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 29
Published on: Dec 6, 2018
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:

© 2018 Cristina Corredor, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.