Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Values and Valuations in Judicial Discourse. A Corpus-Assisted Study of (Dis)Respect in US Supreme Court Decisions on Same-Sex Marriage Cover

Values and Valuations in Judicial Discourse. A Corpus-Assisted Study of (Dis)Respect in US Supreme Court Decisions on Same-Sex Marriage

Open Access
|Oct 2018

References

  1. Breeze, R. 2011. ‘Disciplinary values in legal discourse: a corpus study.’ Iberica 21, 93–116.
  2. Brostoff, T. & Sinsheimer, A. 2003. Legal English. An Introduction to the Legal Language and Culture of the United States. New York: Oceana Publications, Inc.
  3. Fairclough, I. and Fairclough, N. 2012. ‘Values as premises in practical arguments: Conceptions of justice in the public debate over bankers’ bonuses’ in: van Emerson, F. and Garssen, B. (eds.) Exploring Argumentative Contexts, pp. 23–41. Amterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/aic.4.02fai
  4. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. 2018. ‘Facts in Law: a comparative study of fact that and its phraseologies in American and Polish judicial discourse’ in Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. and Pontrandolfo, G. (eds.). Phraseology in Legal and Institutional Settings. A Corpus-based Interdisciplinary Perspective, pp. 143–159. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315445724-9
  5. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. 2017. “Justice with an attitude?” – towards a corpus-based description of evaluative phraseology in judicial discourse’ in Pêzik, P. and Waliñski, J. (eds.) Language, Corpora and Cognition, pp. 107–127. Frankfurt am Main. Peter Lang.
  6. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. 2011. Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. A Corpus-based Study. Frankfurt am Main. Peter Lang.10.3726/978-3-653-00659-9
  7. Goźdź-Roszkowski, S. and Pontrandolfo, S. 2013. ‘Evaluative patterns in judicial discourse: a corpus-based phraseological perspective on American and Italian criminal judgments.’ International Journal of Law, Language and Discourse, vol 13, Issue 2, pp. 9–69.
  8. Macagno, F. 2016. Defining Marriage: Classification, Interpretation, and Definitional Disputes. Informal Logic, 36.3, pp. 309–332.10.22329/il.v36i3.4721
  9. Mazzi, D. 2010. ‘This Argument Fails for Two Reasons... A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgements.’ International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 23 No. 4: 373–385.10.1007/s11196-010-9162-0
  10. Partington, A., Duguid, A. and Taylor, C. (eds.). 2013. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse. Theory and practice in corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benajmins.10.1075/scl.55
  11. Partington, A. 2004. ‘Corpora and Discourse: A most congruous beast’ in A. Partington, J. Morley & L. Haarman (eds.) Corpora and Discourse., 11–20. Bern: Peter Lang.
  12. Perelman, Ch. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1969. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
  13. Rayson, Paul. 2008. ‘From key words to key semantic domains.’ International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 13:(4): 519–549.10.1075/ijcl.13.4.06ray
  14. Scott, M. 2008. WordSmith Tools Help Manual. Version 5.0. Liverpool. Lexical Analysis Software.
  15. Thompson, G. & Alba Juez L. 2014. Evaluation in Context. Amsterdam: John Benajmins.10.1075/pbns.242
  16. Thompson, G. and Hunston, S. 2000. Evaluation. An Introduction. In: Hunston, S. and Thompson, G. (eds.) Evaluation in Text. Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. pp. 1–27. Oxford: OUP.10.1093/oso/9780198238546.003.0001
  17. Williams, R. 1995. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  18. Zimmerman, J. 2015. Wartoœci w prawie administracyjnym. [Values in Administrative Law) Warszawa: LEX. Wolters Kluwer.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0004 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 79
Published on: Oct 29, 2018
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2018 Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.