Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to Classify Participants of a Questionnaire Survey with Regard to Their Individual Inclination to Respond at Random Cover

Using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to Classify Participants of a Questionnaire Survey with Regard to Their Individual Inclination to Respond at Random

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 39 (2014): Issue 1 (December 2014)
By:   
Open Access
|Dec 2014
References

References

  1. Bereziewicz, W., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2012). Jak dużo a priori w a posteriori: poznanie naukowe z zastosowaniem metod statystyki. Cogitatum, 2, 1-9, Retrieved from http://filozof.uni.lodz.pl/knf/cogitatum/numer2/cog2bereziewicz.pdf.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Chmiel, I., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2010). The scope of acceptance by patients motherly and friendly style of nurse’s supporting behaviour in palliative care. Problemy Pielęgniarstwa, 18(4), 399-405.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Chmiel, I., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2011). Method for evaluating an individual inclina- tion to guess Yes-or-No answers in case of a diversity of opinion at group of trustworthy responders. In L. Bobrowski, T. Burzykowski, J. Doroszewski, & C. Enachescu (Eds.). 114-th ICB Seminar - VIII-th International Seminar: Statistics and Clinical Practice, 8-11 June 2011 (pp. 59-61). Warsaw, Poland: IBIB PAN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Chmiel, I., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2012). How much credible are the responses obtained from an individual respondent in a non-repeated questionnaire survey: looking for practical methods with a statistical support. Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric. Logical, Statistical and Computer Methods in Medicine, 29(42), 55-73. Retrieved from http://logika.uwb.edu.pl/studies/vol42.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Chmiel, I., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2014). Measuring physical ability among convalescents on the base of patient-reported quality of life: statistical support for credibility of an individual patient’s report. In L. Bobrowski, U. Mansmann, & C. Enachescu (Eds.). Statistics and Clinical Practice. Lecture Notes of the ICB Seminar., ICB Polish Academy of Sciences, June 2014 (pp. 84). Warsaw, Poland: IBIB PAN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 229-238.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Counselling Resource Research Staff. (2012). Welcome to the Center for Epi- demiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), a Screening Test for Depression. Retrieved from http://counsellingresource.com/lib/quizzes/depression-testing/cesd/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Dojka, E., Gorkiewicz, M., & Pająk, A. (2003). Psychometric value of CES-D scale for the assessment of depression in Polish population. Psychiatria Polska, 37(2), 281-292.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Eng, J. (n.d.). ROC analysis: web-based calculator for ROC curves. Retrieved from http://www.jrocfit.org.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Fava, G. A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. J Clin Psychol., 39(2), 249-251.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  11. Fawcett, T, & Flash, P. A. (2005). A Response to Webb and Ting’s On the Application of ROC Analysis to Predict Classification Performance Under varying Class Distributions. Machine Learning, 58(1), 33-38.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. Garb, H. N, Wood, J. M., & Fiedler, E. R. (2011). A Comparison of Three Strategies for Scale Construction to Predict a Specific Behavioral Outcome. Assessment, 18(4), 399-411.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  13. Gerrie, M. P., Belcher, & L. E., Garry, M. (2006). Mind the gap: false memories for missing aspects of an event, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(5), 689-696.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Gniadek, A., Kozicka, M., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2010). Nieoczekiwane, pośrednie i pozorne powiązania czynnikow jakości życia osob starszych. In Z. Sienkiewicz, W. Fidecki, & G. Wojcik (Eds.). Wybrane Determinanty Pielęgniarstwa, Część II (pp. 118-127). Warsaw, Poland: Oficyna Wydawnicza Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Górkiewicz, M. (2009). Using Propensity Score with Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) and Bootstrap to Evaluate Effect Size in Observational Studies. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 29(4), 41-61.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Górkiewicz, M. (2010). Kognitywistyczne spojrzenie na skale psychometryczne: kiedy trudne jest łatwiejsze od łatwego... In A. Pohl, M. Goc, M. Kittel, T. Konik, & M. Siedlecka (Eds.). Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, IV (pp. 81-86). Krakow, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Górkiewicz, M. (2014). Detecting patient’s random answers to questionnaire with opposite items and the shifted population norm. In L. Bobrowski, U. Mans- mann, & C. Enachescu (Eds.). Statistics and Clinical Practice. Lecture Notes of the ICB Seminar., ICB Polish Academy of Sciences, June 2014 (pp. 127-130). Warsaw, Poland: IBIB PAN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Górkiewicz, M., Ciszek, E., & Szczygieł, A. (2005). Ocenianie kompetencji eksperta na podstawie procedury powtornego rozmieszczania. In Z. J. Brzeziński (Ed.). Horyzonty Metodyczne w Epidemiologii (pp. 125-129). Warsaw, Poland: Komisja Epidemiologii i Zdrowia Publicznego PAN.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Górkiewicz, M., & Gniadek, A. (2012). The practicality of any nonparametric statistical procedure should be confirmed thoroughly with regard to the data distribution under study. Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric. Logical, Statistical and Computer Methods in Medicine, 29(42), 27-42. Retrieved from http://logika.uwb.edu.pl/studies/vol42.html.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Górkiewicz, M., & Kołacz, J. (2001). Statystyka Medyczna. Podejście praktyczne przy zastosowaniu programu MS Excel. Krakow, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Górkiewicz, M., & Kreiner, D. S. (2007). Gender Differences in Creating False Memory under the DRM Paradigm. European Epi-Marker, 11(2), 6-12.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the Validity of Adapted Test: Myths to be Avoided and Guidelines for Improving Test Adaptation Prac- tices. J Appl Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-30.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Hand, D. J., & Till, R. J. (2001). A Simple Generalisation of the Area Under the ROC Curve for Multiple Class Classification Problems. Machine Learning, 45(2), 171-186.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29-36.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radio- logy, 148, 839-843.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Hann, D., Winter, K., & Jacobsen, P. (1999). Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: Evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 46, 437-443.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. Helmes, E., & Nielson, W. R. (1998). An examination of the internal structure of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale in two medical samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 735-743.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Miller, W. C., Anton, H. A., & Townson, A. F. (2008). Measurement properties of the CESD scale among individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord., 46(4), 287-292.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Obuchowski, N. A. (1998). Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy, Stat. Meth. Med. Res., 7, 371-392.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. Orme, J. G., Reis, J., & Herz, E. (1988). Factorial and discriminant of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. Med. Care, 26, 775-789.
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Park, N. S., Jang, Z., Lee, B. S., Ko, J. E., & Chiriboga, D. A. (2014). The Impact of Social Resources on Depressive Symptoms in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Older Adults: Variations by Groups With Differing Health Risks. Research on Aging, 36, 322-342.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  32. Peña-Sánchez, J. N., Domagala, A., Gorkiewicz, M., Targowska, M., & Oleszczyk, M. (2011). Adapting a tool in Poland for the measurement of the physicians’ career satisfaction. Journal of Family Medicine Topics, 12(1), 58-65. Retrieved from http://pmr.org.pl/.
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Re- search in the General Population. Appl Psych Measurement, 3, 385-401.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  34. Radloff, L. S. (1991). The Use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression Scale in Adolescents and Young Adults. J Youth Adoles, 20(2), 149-166.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803-814.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha, Psychometrika, 74(1), 107-120.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. West, R. L., & Stone, K. R. (2014). Age Differences in Eyewitness Memory for a Realistic Event. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 69(3), 338-347.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. Wiklund, I. (2004). Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life, Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 18(3), 351-363.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. Zweig, M. H., & Campbell, G. (1993). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem, 39(4), 561-577.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0041 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 (formerly 0860-150X) | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 89 - 103
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2014 Maciej Górkiewicz, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 39 (2014): Issue 1 (December 2014)
Previous article
Next article