Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to Classify Participants of a Questionnaire Survey with Regard to Their Individual Inclination to Respond at Random Cover

Using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) to Classify Participants of a Questionnaire Survey with Regard to Their Individual Inclination to Respond at Random

Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. Bereziewicz, W., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2012). Jak dużo a priori w a posteriori: poznanie naukowe z zastosowaniem metod statystyki. Cogitatum, 2, 1-9, Retrieved from http://filozof.uni.lodz.pl/knf/cogitatum/numer2/cog2bereziewicz.pdf.
  2. Chmiel, I., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2010). The scope of acceptance by patients motherly and friendly style of nurse’s supporting behaviour in palliative care. Problemy Pielęgniarstwa, 18(4), 399-405.
  3. Chmiel, I., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2011). Method for evaluating an individual inclina- tion to guess Yes-or-No answers in case of a diversity of opinion at group of trustworthy responders. In L. Bobrowski, T. Burzykowski, J. Doroszewski, & C. Enachescu (Eds.). 114-th ICB Seminar - VIII-th International Seminar: Statistics and Clinical Practice, 8-11 June 2011 (pp. 59-61). Warsaw, Poland: IBIB PAN.
  4. Chmiel, I., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2012). How much credible are the responses obtained from an individual respondent in a non-repeated questionnaire survey: looking for practical methods with a statistical support. Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric. Logical, Statistical and Computer Methods in Medicine, 29(42), 55-73. Retrieved from http://logika.uwb.edu.pl/studies/vol42.html.
  5. Chmiel, I., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2014). Measuring physical ability among convalescents on the base of patient-reported quality of life: statistical support for credibility of an individual patient’s report. In L. Bobrowski, U. Mansmann, & C. Enachescu (Eds.). Statistics and Clinical Practice. Lecture Notes of the ICB Seminar., ICB Polish Academy of Sciences, June 2014 (pp. 84). Warsaw, Poland: IBIB PAN.
  6. Collins, D. (2003). Pretesting survey instruments: An overview of cognitive methods. Quality of Life Research, 12(3), 229-238.10.1023/A:1023254226592
  7. Counselling Resource Research Staff. (2012). Welcome to the Center for Epi- demiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D), a Screening Test for Depression. Retrieved from http://counsellingresource.com/lib/quizzes/depression-testing/cesd/.
  8. Dojka, E., Gorkiewicz, M., & Pająk, A. (2003). Psychometric value of CES-D scale for the assessment of depression in Polish population. Psychiatria Polska, 37(2), 281-292.
  9. Eng, J. (n.d.). ROC analysis: web-based calculator for ROC curves. Retrieved from http://www.jrocfit.org.
  10. Fava, G. A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. J Clin Psychol., 39(2), 249-251.10.1002/1097-4679(198303)39:2<;249::AID-JCLP2270390218>3.0.CO;2-Y
  11. Fawcett, T, & Flash, P. A. (2005). A Response to Webb and Ting’s On the Application of ROC Analysis to Predict Classification Performance Under varying Class Distributions. Machine Learning, 58(1), 33-38.10.1007/s10994-005-5256-4
  12. Garb, H. N, Wood, J. M., & Fiedler, E. R. (2011). A Comparison of Three Strategies for Scale Construction to Predict a Specific Behavioral Outcome. Assessment, 18(4), 399-411.10.1177/1073191110381722
  13. Gerrie, M. P., Belcher, & L. E., Garry, M. (2006). Mind the gap: false memories for missing aspects of an event, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(5), 689-696.10.1002/acp.1221
  14. Gniadek, A., Kozicka, M., & Gorkiewicz, M. (2010). Nieoczekiwane, pośrednie i pozorne powiązania czynnikow jakości życia osob starszych. In Z. Sienkiewicz, W. Fidecki, & G. Wojcik (Eds.). Wybrane Determinanty Pielęgniarstwa, Część II (pp. 118-127). Warsaw, Poland: Oficyna Wydawnicza Warszawskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego.
  15. Górkiewicz, M. (2009). Using Propensity Score with Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) and Bootstrap to Evaluate Effect Size in Observational Studies. Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 29(4), 41-61.
  16. Górkiewicz, M. (2010). Kognitywistyczne spojrzenie na skale psychometryczne: kiedy trudne jest łatwiejsze od łatwego... In A. Pohl, M. Goc, M. Kittel, T. Konik, & M. Siedlecka (Eds.). Rocznik Kognitywistyczny, IV (pp. 81-86). Krakow, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  17. Górkiewicz, M. (2014). Detecting patient’s random answers to questionnaire with opposite items and the shifted population norm. In L. Bobrowski, U. Mans- mann, & C. Enachescu (Eds.). Statistics and Clinical Practice. Lecture Notes of the ICB Seminar., ICB Polish Academy of Sciences, June 2014 (pp. 127-130). Warsaw, Poland: IBIB PAN.
  18. Górkiewicz, M., Ciszek, E., & Szczygieł, A. (2005). Ocenianie kompetencji eksperta na podstawie procedury powtornego rozmieszczania. In Z. J. Brzeziński (Ed.). Horyzonty Metodyczne w Epidemiologii (pp. 125-129). Warsaw, Poland: Komisja Epidemiologii i Zdrowia Publicznego PAN.
  19. Górkiewicz, M., & Gniadek, A. (2012). The practicality of any nonparametric statistical procedure should be confirmed thoroughly with regard to the data distribution under study. Studies in Logic Grammar and Rhetoric. Logical, Statistical and Computer Methods in Medicine, 29(42), 27-42. Retrieved from http://logika.uwb.edu.pl/studies/vol42.html.
  20. Górkiewicz, M., & Kołacz, J. (2001). Statystyka Medyczna. Podejście praktyczne przy zastosowaniu programu MS Excel. Krakow, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  21. Górkiewicz, M., & Kreiner, D. S. (2007). Gender Differences in Creating False Memory under the DRM Paradigm. European Epi-Marker, 11(2), 6-12.
  22. Hambleton, R. K., & Patsula, L. (1999). Increasing the Validity of Adapted Test: Myths to be Avoided and Guidelines for Improving Test Adaptation Prac- tices. J Appl Testing Technology, 1(1), 1-30.
  23. Hand, D. J., & Till, R. J. (2001). A Simple Generalisation of the Area Under the ROC Curve for Multiple Class Classification Problems. Machine Learning, 45(2), 171-186.10.1023/A:1010920819831
  24. Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143, 29-36.10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
  25. Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves derived from the same cases. Radio- logy, 148, 839-843.10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708
  26. Hann, D., Winter, K., & Jacobsen, P. (1999). Measurement of depressive symptoms in cancer patients: Evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 46, 437-443.10.1016/S0022-3999(99)00004-5
  27. Helmes, E., & Nielson, W. R. (1998). An examination of the internal structure of the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale in two medical samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 735-743.10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00110-X
  28. Miller, W. C., Anton, H. A., & Townson, A. F. (2008). Measurement properties of the CESD scale among individuals with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord., 46(4), 287-292.10.1038/sj.sc.3102127
  29. Obuchowski, N. A. (1998). Sample size calculations in studies of test accuracy, Stat. Meth. Med. Res., 7, 371-392.10.1177/096228029800700405
  30. Orme, J. G., Reis, J., & Herz, E. (1988). Factorial and discriminant of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Scale. Med. Care, 26, 775-789.
  31. Park, N. S., Jang, Z., Lee, B. S., Ko, J. E., & Chiriboga, D. A. (2014). The Impact of Social Resources on Depressive Symptoms in Racially and Ethnically Diverse Older Adults: Variations by Groups With Differing Health Risks. Research on Aging, 36, 322-342.10.1177/0164027513486991
  32. Peña-Sánchez, J. N., Domagala, A., Gorkiewicz, M., Targowska, M., & Oleszczyk, M. (2011). Adapting a tool in Poland for the measurement of the physicians’ career satisfaction. Journal of Family Medicine Topics, 12(1), 58-65. Retrieved from http://pmr.org.pl/.
  33. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Re- search in the General Population. Appl Psych Measurement, 3, 385-401.10.1177/014662167700100306
  34. Radloff, L. S. (1991). The Use of the Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression Scale in Adolescents and Young Adults. J Youth Adoles, 20(2), 149-166.10.1007/BF01537606
  35. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803-814.
  36. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha, Psychometrika, 74(1), 107-120.10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
  37. West, R. L., & Stone, K. R. (2014). Age Differences in Eyewitness Memory for a Realistic Event. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 69(3), 338-347.10.1093/geronb/gbt014
  38. Wiklund, I. (2004). Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life, Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 18(3), 351-363.10.1111/j.1472-8206.2004.00234.x
  39. Zweig, M. H., & Campbell, G. (1993). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem, 39(4), 561-577.10.1093/clinchem/39.4.561
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0041 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Language: English
Page range: 89 - 103
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:

© 2014 Maciej Górkiewicz, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.