Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Multi-Criteria Negotiation Analysis Based on the Membership Function Cover

The Multi-Criteria Negotiation Analysis Based on the Membership Function

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 37 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
By:  and    
Open Access
|Aug 2014
References

References

  1. Bellman, R.E., Zadeh, L.A. (1970). Decision making in a fuzzy environment.. 17, 141–164.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  2. Bilgiç, T., Turksen, I.B. (2000). Measurement of membership functions: Theoretical and empirical work, In.7, 195–227.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  3. Brzostowski, J., Roszkowska, E., Wachowicz, T. (2012). Using Multiplie Criteria Decision Making Methods in Negotiation Support., 5(59), 3–29.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Chameau, J.L, Santamarina, J.C. (1987). Measurement Membership Functions: Comparing Methods of Measurement., 1, 287–301.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  5. Chen, C.T. (2000). Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment., 114, 1–9.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  6. De Keyser, W., Peeters, P. (1996). A note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methods., 89(3), 457–461.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. Dubois, D. (2011). The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: Old techniques and new directions., 184, 3–28.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  8. Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (2005). Multiplie Criteria Decision analysis: State of the Art Surveys. New York: Springer.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. García-Cascales, S. M., Lamata M. T. (2012). On rank reversal and TOPSIS method., 56, 123–132.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  10. Gimpel, H. (2007).. Springer-Verlag: Berlin – Heidelberg.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Hammond, J.S., Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H. (1998). Even Swaps: A Rational Method for Making Trade-offs., 76(2), 137–149.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Hammond, J.S., Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H. (2002).. New York: Broadway Books.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Hwang, C. L., Yoon, K. (1981).. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  14. Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H. (1976).. New York: Wiley.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Kwang H. Lee. (2005).. Advances in Soft Computing. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G. H. (2007). Extended VIKOR method in comparison with outranking methods., 178(2), 514–529.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  17. Raiffa, H. (1982).. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Raiffa, H., Richardson, J., Metcalfe, D. (2002).. Cambridge (MA): The Balknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Roszkowska, E., (2011). Wybrane modele negocjacji, Białystok: Wydawnictwo UwB w Białymstoku.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Roszkowska, E., (2012). Zastosowanie metody TOPSIS do wspomagania procesu negocjacji, In: K. Jajuga, M. Walesiak, (Eds.), Wydawnictwo UE we Wrocławiu: Wrocław, 68–75.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Roszkowska, E., Wachowicz, T. (2012). Negotiation Support with Fuzzy TOPSIS. In: Teixeira de Almeida, A., Costa Morais, D., de Franca Dantas Daher, S. (Eds.).. Editoria Universitaria, Federal University of Pernambuco: Recife, 161–174.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Roszkowska, E., Brzostowski J., Wachowicz T., (2014). Negotiation Support in Ill-Structured Negotiation Problems, In: W. Pedrycz, P. Guo, (Eds.).. Springer Verlag, 339–367.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  23. Salo, A., Hamalainen, R.P. (2010). Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Group Decision Processes. In: Kilgour, D.M., Eden, C. (Eds.),. Springer: New York, 269–283.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  24. Saaty, T.L. (1980)., New York, N.Y., McGraw Hill.
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Sancho-Royo A., Verdegay. J.L., (1999). Methods for the Construction of Membership Functions., 14, 1213–1230.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  26. Thompson, L. (1998).. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Schenkerman, S.. (1994). Avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision-support models.74 407–419.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  28. Wang, Y.M Luo, Y. (2009). On rank reversal in decision analysis., 49 (5–6), 1221–1229.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  29. Wachowicz, T., Kersten, G.E. (2009). Zachowania i decyzje negocjacyjne uczestników negocjacji elektronicznych. In: K.A. Kłosiński, A. Biela (Eds). Wydawnictwo KUL: Lublin, 63–74.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Wachowicz, T. (2010). Decision Support In Software Supported Negotiations., 11(4), 576–597.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. Wachowicz, T., Wu, S. (2010). Negotiators' Strategies and Their Concessions. In: de Vreede, G.J. (Ed.).. The Center for Collaboration Science, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 254–259.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Zadeh, L.A. (1965). Fuzzy sets., 8, 338–353.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. Zadeh, L.A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning: Part 1.,, 8, 199–249.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2014-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 (formerly 0860-150X) | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 195 - 217
Published on: Aug 8, 2014
Published by: University of Białystok
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
negotiation support,
membership function,
fuzzy multi-criteria methods
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2014 Ewa Roszkowska, Tomasz Wachowicz, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 37 (2014): Issue 1 (June 2014)
Previous article
Next article