References
- Adams, D. M. (2005). Knowing when Disagreements are Deep. Informal Logic, 25(1), 65-77.
- Corner, A. & Hahn, U. (2010). Message Framing, Normative Advocacy and Per- suasive Success. Argumentation, 24(2), 153-163.
- Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R., & Snoeck Henkemans, A.F. (2002). Argu- mentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erl- baum Associates.
- Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (2004). A Systematic Theory of Argumen- tation: The Pragma-dialectical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Eemeren F. H. van (2009). Strategic Manoeuvring Between Rhetorical Effectiveness and Dialectical Reasonableness. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 16 (29), 69-91.
- Eemeren, F. H. van (2010). Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse - Extending the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Amsterdam- Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
- Fogelin, R. J. (1985). The Logic of Deep Disagreements. Informal Logic, 7(1), 1-8.
- Grady, D. (2005). The Hard Facts Behind A Heartbreaking Case. New York Times, June 19, J Section 4. Retrieved 29 November, 2013, from /http://www.nyti mes.com/2005/06/19/weekinreview/19word.html?pagewanted=all& r=1&/.
- Krabbe, E.C.W. (2007). On How to Get Beyond the Opening Stage. Argumenta- tion, 21(3), 233-242.
- Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.