Collective Referential Intentionality in the Semantics of Dialogue

Dale Jacquette

doi:10.2478/slgr-2014-0007

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Collective Referential Intentionality in the Semantics of Dialogue

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric

Volume 36 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

By: Dale Jacquette

Open Access

|Apr 2014

Asher, N. & Lascarides, A. (2005). Logics of Conversation, Studies in Natural Language Processing series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Berkeley, G. (2013 [1734]). Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous. Edited by Dale Jacquette. Toronto: Broadview Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Bohm, D. (2004). On Dialogue (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Garrod, S. & Anderson, A. (1987). Saying What You Mean in Dialogue: A Study in Conceptual and Semantic Coordination. Cognition, 27, 181-218.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. (1969). Utterer’s Meaning and Intentions’. The Philosophical Review, 68, 147-177.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. (1993a). A Turing Test Conversation. Philosophy, 68, 231-233.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. (1993b). A Dialogue on Zeno’s Paradox of Achilles and the Tortoise’. Argumentation, 7, 273-290.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. (2009). Dialogues on the Ethics of Capital Punishment. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Search in Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. (2012). A Dialogue on Metaphysics. Philosophy Now, 92, 33.
Search in Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. (2013a). Socrates on the Moral Mischief of Misology. Argumentation, 27. On-Line First at Springer DOI 10.1007/s10503-013-9298-7, and forthcoming in print.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Jacquette, D. (2013b). Review ofMaurice A. Finocchiaro,Meta-Argumentation: An Approach to Logic and Argumentation Theory. Argumentation, 27. On-Line First at Springer DOI 10.1007/s10503-013-9301-3, and forthcoming in print.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Johnstone, H. W., Jr. (1952). Philosophy and Argumentum Ad Hominem. The Journal of Philosophy, 49, 489-498.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Johnstone, H. W., Jr. (1954). Some Aspects of Philosophical Disagreement. Dialectica, 8, 245-257.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Johnstone, H.W., Jr. (1996). Locke andWhately on the Argumentum ad Hominem. Argumentation, 10, 89-97.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Kurkela, K. (1986). Note and Tone: A Semantic Analysis of Conventional Music Notation. Helsinki: Suomen Musiikkitieteellinen Seura Musikvetenskapliga S¨allskapet I Finland.
Search in Google Scholar
Minsky, M. (1969). Semantic Information Processing. Cambridge: The MIT (Bradford Books) Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Ong, W. J. (2005 [1958]). Ramus, Method, and the Decay of Dialogue: From the Art of Discourse to the Art of Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Plato (1981). Meno. Translation in G.M.A. Grube, Plato, Five Dialogues: Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Meno, Phaedo. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
Search in Google Scholar
Redmond, J. & Fontaine, M. (2011). How to Play Dialogues: An Introduction to Dialogical Logic. London: College Publications.
Search in Google Scholar
Reyle, U. (1993). Dealing With Ambiguities of Underspecification: Construction, Interpretation and Deduction. Journal of Semantics, 10, 123-179.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Rueckert, H. (2011). Dialogues as a Dynamic Framework for Logic. London: College Publications.
Search in Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar
Walton, D. N. & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. Albany: State University of New York (SUNY) Press.
Search in Google Scholar