Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Information and Communication Technologies in Primary Healthcare – Barriers and Facilitators in the Implementation Process

Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric
Volume 35 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2013

References

  1. European Commission. Information Society and Media Directorate General. (2007). Benchmarking ICT use among General Practitioners in Europe 2007, Country Profile: Poland.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Chaudhry, B., Wang, J., & Wu, S. (2006). Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Annals of Internal Medicine, 144(10), 742-752.10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Cotea, C. (2010). Electronic Health Record Adoption: Perceived Barriers and Facilitators. Research Coordination Unit, CMVH.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. DesRoches, C. M., Painter, M. W., & Jha, A. K. (2013). Health Information Technology in the United States: Better Information Systems for Better Care. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s annual report.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Dobrev, A., Haesner, M., & Husing, T. (2008). Benchmarking ICT use among General Practitioners in Europe final report. Bonn: European Commision, 53-60.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Gans, D., Kralewski, J., Hammons, T., & Dowd, B. (2005). Medical groups’ adoption of electronic health records and information systems. Health Affairs, 24(5), 1323-1333.10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1323
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Georgiou, A., Ampt, A., Creswick, N., Westbrook, J. I., & Braithwaite, J. (2009). Computerized Provider Order Entry What are health professionals concerned about? A qualitative study in an Australian hospital. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(1), 60-70.10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.09.007
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Hackl, W., Hoerbst, A., & Ammenwerth, E. (2009). The electronic health record in Austria: physicians’ acceptance is influenced by negative emotions. Studies in Health Technology & Informatics, 150, 140-144.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. Hier, D. B., Rothschild, A., LeMaistre, A., & Keeler, J. (2005). Differing faculty and house staff acceptance of an electronic health record. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 74(7-8), 657-662.10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.03.006
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. Hillestad, R., Bigelow, J., & Bower, A. (2005). Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Affairs (Millwood), 24(5), 1103-1117.10.1377/hlthaff.24.5.1103
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Jha, A. K., Bates, D. W., Jenter, C., Orav, E. J., Zheng, J., Cleary, P., & Simon, R. (2009). Electronic Health Records: Use, Barriers and Satisfaction Among PhysiciansWho Care For Black and Hispanic Patients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 15(1), 158-163. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00975.x.10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00975.x
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Jha, A. K., DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Donelan, K., Sowmya, R. R., Ferris, T. G., Shields, A, Rosenbaum, S., & Blumenthal, D. (2009). Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. The New England Journal of Medicine, 360(16), 1628-1638.10.1056/NEJMsa0900592
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Kahn, N. B. (2004). The Future of Family Medicine: A Collaborative Project of the Family Medicine Community. Annals of Family Medicine, 2 (suppl 1), s3-s32.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Kossman, S. P., & Scheidenhelm, S. L. (2008). Nurses’ perceptions of the impact of electronic health records on work and patient outcomes. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 26(2), 69-77.10.1097/01.NCN.0000304775.40531.67
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Leung, G. M., Yu, P. L., Wong, I. O., Johnston, J. M., & Tin, K. Y. (2003). Incentives and barriers that influence clinical computerization in Hong Kong: a population-based physician survey. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 10, 201-212.10.1197/jamia.M1202
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Linder, J. A., Ma, J., Bates, D. W., Middleton, B., & Stafford, R. S. (2007). Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Archivos de Medicina Interna, 167(13), 1400-1405. 10.1001/archinte.167.13.1400
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. Lockhart, P. (2008). Two nations achieve a high level of primary care information technology (IT) interoperability: an introduction to a series comparing Denmark and New Zealand’s IT and health care. Informatics in Primary Care, 16(3), 179-181.
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. Loomis, G. A., Ries, J. S., Saywell Jr., R. M., & Thakker, N. R. (2002). If electronic medical records are so great, why aren’t family physicians using them? Journal of Family Practice, 51(7), 636-641.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. Menachemi, N. & Collum, T. H. (2011). Benefits and drawbacks of electronic health record systems. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, 4, 47-55.10.2147/RMHP.S12985
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004). Physicians’ Use Of Electronic Medical Records: Barriers And Solutions. Health Affairs, 23(2), 116-126.10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. Morin, D., Tourigny, A., Pelletier, D., Robichaud, L., Mathieu, L., Vezina, A., Bonin, L., Buteau, M. (2005). Seniors’ views on the use of electronic health records. Informatics in Primary Care, 13, 125-133.
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. Najwyzsza Izba Kontroli. (2013). Informatyzacja szpitali informacja o wynikach kontroli, Raport NIK 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. Pedzinski, B., Sowa, P., Kolpak, M., Pedzinski, W., & Szpak, A. (2013). The use of electronic medical records in primary healthcare in the podlaskie voivodeship. Polish Journal of Public Health, 123(2), 107-111.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. Peterson, K. A. (2012). Essential requirements of information technology for primary care. Family Practice, 29(2), 119-120.10.1093/fampra/cms028
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. Pike, Ch. (2010). An Empirical Analysis of the effects of GP competition. Cooperation & Competition Panel Working Paper Series, vol. 1(2).10.2139/ssrn.2948258
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., & Kawasumi, Y. (2005). The Impact of Electronic Health Records on Time Efficiency of Physicians and Nurses: A Systematic Review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(5), 505-516.10.1197/jamia.M1700
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. Police, R. L., Foster, T. & Wong, K. S. (2010). Adoption and use of health information technology in physician practice organisations: systematic review. Informatics in Primary Care, 18(4), 245-258.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. Protti, D., & Johansen, I. (2010).Widespread Adoption of Information Technology in Primary Care Physician Offices in Denmark: A Case Study. The Commonwealth Fund: ‘Issues in international health policy’, 1379(80).
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. Romano, M. J., & Stafford, R. S. (2011). Electronic health records and clinical decision support systems: impact on national ambulatory care quality. Archivos de Medicina Interna, 171(10), 897-903.10.1001/archinternmed.2010.527
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. Saleem, J. J., Patterson, E. S., Militello, L., Render, M. L., Orshansky, G., & Asch, S. M. (2005). Exploring barriers and facilitators to the use of computerized clinical reminders. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 12(4), 438-447. 10.1197/jamia.M1777
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. Schoen, C., Osborn, R., Squires, D., Doty, M., Rasmussen, P., Pierson, R., & Applebaum, S. (2012). A Survey of Primary Care Doctors in Ten Countries Shows Progress in Use of Health Information Technology, Less in Other Areas. Health Affairs (Millwood), 31(12), 2805-2816.10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0884
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. Sequist, T. D., Cullen, T., Hays, H., Taualii, M. M., Simon, S. R., & Bates, D. W. (2007). Implementation and use of an electronic health record within the Indian Health Service. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 14(2), 191-197.10.1197/jamia.M2234
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. Ustawa z dnia 28 kwietnia 2011 o systemie informacji w ochronie zdrowia. (2011). Dz.U. 2011 vol. 113 item 657.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. Wang, S. J., Middleton, B., & Prosser, L. A. (2003). A cost-benefit analysis of electronic medical records in primary care. The American Journal of Medicine, 114(5), 397-403.10.1016/S0002-9343(03)00057-3
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. Zakaria, N., Mohd Affendi, S. Y., & Zakaria, N. (2010). Managing ICT in healthcare organization: culture, challenges, and issues of technology adoption and implementation. In Y. K. Dwivedi, K. Khoumbati, B. Lal, & A. Srivastava (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Advances in Health Informatics and Electronic Healthcare Applications: Global Adoption and Impact of Information Communication Technologies (pp. 153-168). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2013-0035 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6059 | Journal ISSN: 0860-150X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 179 - 189
Published on: Dec 31, 2013
Published by: University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:
Philosophy,
Philosophy, other

© 2013 Bartosz Pędziński, Paweł Sowa, Waldemar Pędziński, Michalina Krzyżak, Dominik Maślach, Andrzej Szpak, published by University of Białystok, Department of Pedagogy and Psychology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 35 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)Next article