Safety First? On the Timing of Moving in With a Partner and Its Determinants

Julia Zimmermann; Gerald Prein

doi:10.2478/sjs-2023-0020

Abstract

We analyze the first cohabitation with a partner as one of the key events in the transition to adulthood and consider its interdependencies with other life events, using life course data from the survey AID:A 2019 of the German Youth Institute (DJI). A remarkable finding is that for men, cohabitation with a partner usually occurs after an individual’s entry into permanent employment.

References

Aassve, Arnstein, Francesco C. Billari, and Fausta Ongaro. 2001. The Impact of Income and Employment Status on Leaving Home: Evidence from the Italian ECHP Sample. Labour 15(3): 501–529. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00175.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Addo, Fenaba R. 2014. Debt, Cohabitation, and Marriage in Young Adulthood. Demography 51(5): 1677–1701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0333-6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Becker, Gary S. 1981. A Treatise on the Family. Cambridge, London: Havard University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Berninger, Ina, Bernd Weiß, and Michael Wagner. 2011. On the Links Between Employment, Partnership Quality, and the Desire to Have a First Child. Demographic Research 24: 579–610. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2011.24.24.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Billari, Francesco C. and Aart C. Liefbroer. 2010. Towards a New Pattern of Transition to Adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research 15(2-3): 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2010.10.003.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, and Johannes Huinink. 1991. Human Capital Investments or Norms of Role Transition? How Women’s Schooling and Career Affect the Process of Family Formation. American Journal of Sociology 97(1): 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1086/229743.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, and Gerald Prein. 1998. The Relationship Between Rational Choice Theory and Large-Scale Data Analysis – Past Developments and Future Perspectives. Pp. 3–27 in Rational Choice Theory and Large-Scale Data Analysis, edited by Hans-Peter Blossfeld, and Gerald Prein. Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford: Westview Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brückner, Hannah, and Karl U. Mayer. 2005. De-Standardization of the Life Course: What it Might Mean? And if it Means Anything, Whether it Actually Took Place? Advances in Life Course Research 9(1): 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-2608(04)09002-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buchholz, Sandra, and Karin Kurz. 2008. A New Mobility Regime in Germany? Young People’s Labor Market Entry and Phase of Establishment since the Mid-1980s. Pp. 51–75, in Young Workers, Globalization and the Labor Market: Comparing Early Working Life in Eleven Countries, edited by Hans-Peter Blossfeld, Sandra Buchholz, Erzsébeth Bukodi, and Karin Kurz. Cheltenham: Elgar.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buchmann, Marlis C., and Irene Kriesi. 2011. Transition to Adulthood in Europe. Annual Review of Sociology 37(1):481–503. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150212.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Bumpass, Larry L., and James A. Sweet. 1991. The Role of Cohabitation in Declining Rates of Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family 53: 913–927. https://doi.org/10.2307/352997.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Casper, Lynne M., and Philip N. Cohen. 2000. How Does POSSLQ Measure up? Historical Estimates of Cohabitation. Demography 37(2): 237–245. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648125.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clarkberg, Marin. 1999. The Price of Partnering: The Role of Economic Well-being in Young Adults’ First Union Experiences. Social Forces 77(3): 945–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/3005967.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coulter, Rory, and Yang Hu. 2017. Living Apart Together and Cohabitation Intentions in Great Britain. Journal of Family Issues 38(12): 1701–1729. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X15619461.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dykstra, Pearl A., and Anne-Rigt Poortman. 2010. Economic Resources and Remaining Single. Trends over Time. European Sociological Review 26(3): 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Elder, Glen H., Monica K. Johnson, and Robert Crosnoe. 2003. The Emergence and Development of Life Course Theory. Pp 3–19 in Handbook of the Life Course, edited by Jeylan T. Mortimer, and Michael J. Shanahan. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Giddens, Anthony. 1992. The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goldscheider, Frances K., and Linda J. Waite. 1986. Sex Differences in the Entry Into Marriage. American Journal of Sociology 92(1): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1086/228464.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Groh-Samberg, Olaf, and Ramsey Wise. 2017. Education and Employment Transitions in Germany Before and After the Financial Crisis. Pp. 177–207 in Young People’s Development and the Great Recession. Uncertain Transitions and Precarious Futures, edited by Ingrid Schoon, and John Bynner. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guzzo, Karen B. 2006. The Relationship Between Life Course Events and Union Formation. Social Science Research 35(2): 384–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2005.06.002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Guzzo, Karen B. 2014. Trends in Cohabitation Outcomes: Compositional Changes and Engagement Among Never-Married Young Adults. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(4): 826–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12123.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hayford, Sarah R., and S. Philip Morgan. 2008. The Quality of Retrospective Data on Cohabitation. Demography 45(1): 129–141. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2008.0005.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Heuveline, Patrick, and Jeffrey M. Timberlake. 2004. The Role of Cohabitation in Family Formation: The United States in Comparative Perspective. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(5): 1214–1230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-2445.2004.00088.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hiekel, Nicole. 2014. The Different Meanings of Cohabitation Across Europe: How Cohabiters View Their Unions and Differ in Their Plans and Behaviors. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hiekel, Nicole, Aart C. Liefbroer, and Anne-Rigt Poortman. 2014. Understanding Diversity in the Meaning of Cohabitation Across Europe. European Journal of Population 30(4): 391–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-014-9321-1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hiekel, Nicole, and Renske Keizer. 2015. Risk-Avoidance or Utmost Commitment. Dutch Focus Group Research on Cohabitation and Marriage. Demographic Research 32: 311–340. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.10.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hiekel, Nicole, and Michael Wagner. 2021. Individualized Relationship Practices and Union Dissolution: Differences Between Marriage and Cohabitation. European Sociological Review 36(6): 868–885. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcaa021.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hogan, Dennis P. 1978. The Variable Order of Events in the Life Course. American Sociological Review 43(4): 573–586. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094780.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hogan, Dennis P. 1980. The Transition to Adulthood as a Career Contingency. American Sociological Review 45(2): 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.12.1.109.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Huang, Penelope M., Pamela J. Smock, Wendy D. Manning, and Cara A. Bergstrom-Lynch. 2011. He Says, She Says: Gender and Cohabitation. Journal of Family Issues 32(7): 876–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X10397601.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jalovaara, Marika. 2012. Socio-Economic Resources and First-Union Formation in Finland, Cohorts Born 1969-81. Population Studies 66(1): 69–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00324728.2011.641720.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jose, Anita, Daniel K. O’Leary, and Anne Moyer. 2010. Does Premarital Cohabitation Predict Subsequent Marital Stability and Marital Quality? A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(1): 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2009.00686.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kalmijn, Matthijs. 2011. The Influence of Men’s Income and Employment on Marriage and Cohabitation. Testing Oppenheimer’s Theory in Europe. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 27(3): 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-011-9238-x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kiernan, Kathleen. 2001. The Rise of Cohabitation and Childbearing Outside Marriage in Western Europe. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 15(1): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/15.1.1.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kley, Stefanie, and Johannes Huinink. 2006. Die Gründung des eigenen Haushalts bei Ost- und Westdeutschen nach der Wiedervereinigung. Zeitschrift für Bevölkerungswissenschaft 31(1): 127–154.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kline, Galena H., Scott M. Stanley, Howard J. Markman, P. A. Olmos-Gallo, Michelle St Peters, Sarah W. Whitton, and Lydia M. Prado. 2004. Timing is Everything. Pre-Engagement Cohabitation and Increased Risk for Poor Marital Outcomes. Journal of Family Psychology 18(2): 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.311.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Konietzka, Dirk. 2010. Zeiten des Übergangs: Sozialer Wandel des Übergangs in das Erwachsenenalter. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Konietzka, Dirk, and Johannes Huinink. 2003. Die De-Standardisierung einer Statuspassage? Zum Wandel des Auszugs aus dem Elternhaus und des Übergangs in das Erwachsenenalter in Westdeutschland. Soziale Welt 54(3): 285–311.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Konietzka, Dirk, and André Tatjes. 2014. Two Steps of Union Formation. First Intimate Relationships and First Coresidential Unions in the Life Courses of the German Cohorts 1971–1973 and 1981–1983. Journal of Youth Studies 17(8): 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2014.888405.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krapf, Sandra. 2018. Moving in or Breaking Up? The Role of Distance in the Development of Romantic Relationships. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 34(3): 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9428-2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Krapf, Sandra, Clara H. Mulder, and Michael Wagner. 2021. The Transition to a Coresidential Partnership. Who Moves and Who Has the Partner Move In? Population Research and Policy Review 41 (2): 757–779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-021-09665-4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuger, Susanne, Gerald Prein, Anja, Linberg, Claudia Hoffmann-Recksiedler, and Andreas Herz. 2020. Aufwachsen in Deutschland: Alltagswelten 2019 (AID:A 2019). Alltagswelten von Kindern, Jugendlichen und Familien. Haupterhebung, 2019. Version 1. Deutsches Jugendinstitut. Collection. https://doi.org/10.17621/aida2019
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuo, Janet Chen-Lan, and R. Kelly Raley. 2016. Diverging Patterns of Union Transition Among Cohabitors by Race/Ethnicity and Education. Trends and Marital Intentions in the United States. Demography 53(4): 921–935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-016-0483-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kuperberg, Arielle. 2014. Age at Coresidence, Premarital Cohabitation, and Marriage Dissolution: 1985-2009. Journal of Marriage and Family 76(2): 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12092.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Le Blanc, David, and François-Charles Wolff. 2006. Leaving Home in Europe: The Role of Parents’ and Children’s Incomes. Review of Economics of the Household 4(1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-005-6697-z.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lewin, Alisa C. 2018. Intentions to Live Together Among Couples Living Apart. Differences by Age and Gender. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 34(5): 721–743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-017-9446-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lichter, Daniel T., Katherine Michelmore, Richard N. Turner, and Sharon Sassler. 2016. Pathways to a Stable Union? Pregnancy and Childbearing Among Cohabiting and Married Couples. Population Research and Policy Review 35(3): 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-016-9392-2.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Liefbroer, Aart C., Anne-Rigt Poortman, and Judith A. Seltzer. 2015. Why Do Intimate Partners Live Apart? Evidence on LAT Relationships Across Europe. Demographic Research 32: 251–286. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2015.32.8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lindenberg, Siegwart. 2013. Social Rationality, Self-Regulation, and Well-Being: The Regulatory Significance of Needs, Goals, and the Self. Pp. 72–112, in The Handbook of Rational Choice Social Research, edited by Rafael Wittek, Tom A. B. Snijders, and Victor Nee. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lois, Daniel, and Nadia Lois. 2012. „Living apart together“ – eine dauerhafte Alternative? Zur Bedeutung von beruflichen Lagen und Partnerschaftsbildern für das Leben in getrennten Haushalten. Soziale Welt 63(2): 117–140. https://doi.org/10.5771/0038-6073-2012-2-117.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lundberg, Shelly, Robert A. Pollak, and Jenna Stearns. 2016. Family Inequality: Diverging Patterns in Marriage, Cohabitation, and Childbearing. Journal of Economic Perspectives 30(2): 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.2.79.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Macmillan, Ross. 2005. The Structure of the Life Course. Classic Issues and Current Controversies. Advances in Life Course Research 9(1): 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-2608(04)09001-X.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Manning, Wendy D. 2020. Young Adulthood Relationships in an Era of Uncertainty: A Case for Cohabitation. Demography 57(3): 799–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-020-00881-9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marini, Margaret M. 1984a. Age and Sequencing Norms in the Transition to Adulthood. Social Forces 63(1): 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/63.1.229.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Marini, Margaret M. 1984b. The Order of Events in the Transition to Adulthood. Sociology of Education 57(2): 63–84. https://doi.org/10.2307/2112630.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mortimer, Jeylan T., Sabrina Oesterle, and Helga Krüger. 2005. Age Norms, Institutional Structures, and the Timing of Markers of Transition to Adulthood. Advances in Life Course Research 9: 175–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-2608(04)09007-0.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mulder, Clara H., William A. V. Clark, and Michael Wagner. 2006. Resources, Living Arrangements and First Union Formation in the United States, the Netherlands and West Germany. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie 22(1): 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-005-4768-8.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Neugarten, Bernice L., Joan W. Moore, and John C. Lowe. 1965. Age Norms, Age Constraints, and Adult Socialization. American Journal of Sociology 70(6): 710–717. https://doi.org/10.1086/223965.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oppenheimer, Valerie K. 1988. A Theory of Marriage Timing. American Journal of Sociology 94(3): 563–591. https://doi.org/0.1086/229030.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oppenheimer, Valerie K. 2003. Cohabiting and Marriage During Young Men’s Career-Development Process. Demography 40(1): 127–149. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180815.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Oppenheimer, Valerie K., Matthijs Kalmijn, and Nelson Lim. 1997. Men’s Career Development and Marriage Timing During a Period of Rising Inequality. Demography 34(3): 311–330. https://doi.org/:10.2307/3038286.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Osterland, Martin. 1989. «Normalbiographie» und «Normalarbeitsverhältnis». Bremen: Universität Bremen.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Parker, Emily. 2020. Gender Differences in the Marital Plans and Union Transitions of First Cohabitations. Population Research and Policy Review 40(4): 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-020-09579-7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perelli-Harris, Brienna, Ann Berrington, Nora Sánchez Gassen, Paulina Galezewska, and Jennifer A. Holland. 2017. The Rise in Divorce and Cohabitation: Is There a Link? Population and Development Review 43(2): 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1111/padr.12063.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Perelli-Harris, Brienna, and Nora Sánchez Gassen. 2012. How Similar Are Cohabitation and Marriage Legal Approaches to Cohabitation Across Western Europe. Population and Development Review 38(3): 435–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00511.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Régnier-Loilier, Arnaud. 2016. Partnership Trajectories of People in Stable Non-Cohabiting Relationships in France. Demographic Research 35: 1169–1212. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2016.35.40.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rhoades, Galena K., Scott M. Stanley, and Howard J. Markman. 2009. Couples’ Reasons for Cohabitation. Associations with Individual Well-Being and Relationship Quality. Journal of Family Issues 30(2): 233–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08324388.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rindfuss, Ronald R., and Audrey Vandenheuvel. 1990. Cohabitation: A Precursor to Marriage or an Alternative to Being Single? Population and Development Review 16(4): 703–726. doi:10.2307/1972963.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sassler, Sharon. 2004. The Process of Entering Into Cohabiting Unions. Journal of Marriage and Family 66(2): 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2004.00033.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sassler, Sharon, and Frances Goldscheider. 2004. Revisiting Jane Austen’s Theory of Marriage Timing. Changes in Union Formation Among American Men in the Late 20th Century. Journal of Family Issues 25(2): 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03257708.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sassler, Sharon, and James McNally. 2003. Cohabiting Couples’ Economic Circumstances and Union Transitions. A Re-Examination Using Multiple Imputation Techniques. Social Science Research 32(4): 553–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0049-089X(03)00016-4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sassler, Sharon, and Amanda J. Miller. 2017. Cohabitation Nation: Gender, Class and the Remaking of Relationships. Oakland: University of California Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schoon, Ingrid, and Rainer K. Silbereisen. 2009. Conceptualising School-to-Work Transitions in Context. Pp. 3–29 in Transitions from School to Work: Globalization, Individualization, and Patterns of Diversity, edited by Ingrid Schoon and Rainer K. Silbereisen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Settersten, Richard A. 2003. Age Structuring and the Rhythm of the Life Course. Pp. 81–98 in Handbook of the Life Course, edited by Jeylan T. Mortimer and Michael J. Shanahan. New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Settersten, Richard A., and Karl U. Mayer. 1997. The Measurement of Age, Age Structuring, and the Life Course. Annual Review of Sociology 23(1): 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.23.1.233.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Shanahan, Michael J. 2000. Pathways to Adulthood in Changing Societies: Variability and Mechanisms in Life Course Perspective. Annual Review of Sociology 26(1): 667–692. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.667.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Smock, Pamela J., Wendy D. Manning, and Meredith Porter. 2005. ‘‘Everything’s There Except Money’’: How Money Shapes Decisions to Marry Among Cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(3): 680–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00162.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stanley, Scott M., Galena K. Rhoades, Paul R. Amato, Howard J. Markman, and Christine A. Johnson. 2010. The Timing of Cohabitation and Engagement: Impact on First and Second Marriages. Journal of Marriage and Family 72(4): 906–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00738.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sweeney, Megan M. 2002. Two Decades of Family Change: The Shifting Economic Foundations of Marriage. American Sociological Review 67(1): 132–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088937.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Thornton, Arland, William G. Axinn, and Jay D. Teachman. 1995. The Influence of School Enrollment and Accumulation on Cohabitation and Marriage in Early Adulthood. American Sociological Review 60(5): 762–774. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096321.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wagner, Michael, Clara H. Mulder, Bernd Weiß, and Sandra Krapf. 2019. The Transition from Living Apart Together to a Coresidential Partnership. Advances in Life Course Research 39(4): 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2018.12.002.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Waller, Maureen R., and Sara S. McLanahan. 2005. ‘‘His’’ and ‘‘Her’’ Marriage Expectations: Determinants and Consequences. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(1): 53–67. https://doi.org/:10.1111/j.0022-2445.2005.00005.x.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wiik, Kenneth A. 2009. “You’d Better Wait!” – Socio-Economic Background and Timing of First Marriage versus First Cohabitation. European Sociological Review 25(2): 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn045.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wiik, Kenneth A. 2011. Socioeconomic Differentials in the Transition to First Cohabitation in Norway. International Review of Sociology 21(3): 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2011.625662.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Xie, Yu, James M. Raymo, Kimberly Goyette, and Arland Thornton. 2003. Economic Potential and Entry Into Marriage and Cohabitation. Demography 40(2): 351–367. https://doi.org/10.2307/3180805.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Yamaguchi, Kazuo. 1991. Event History Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Safety First? On the Timing of Moving in With a Partner and Its Determinants

Abstract

Paradigm

My account