Measuring Women’s Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties
By: Kateřina Ratislavová, Jana Horová and Patrice Marek
References
- Fowler G, Patterson D. Use of maternity surveys in improving the care experience – a review of the evidence. Br J Midwifery. 2013;21(6):410–415. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2013.21.6.410.
- Blazquez AR, Corchon S, Ferrandiz FE. Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review. Midwifery. 2017;55:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014.
- Perriman N, Davis D. Measuring maternal satisfaction with maternity care: A systematic integrative review. Women Birth. 2016;29(3):293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.004.
- Sawyer A, Ayers S, Abbott J, Gyte G, Rabe H, Duley L. Measures of satisfaction with care during labour and birth: A comparative review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-108.
- Nilvér H, Begley C, Berg M. Measuring women’s childbirth experiences: A systematic review for identification and analysis of validated instruments. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1356-y.
- 6.
Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) user manual Version 1.0 [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from:
https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf MokkinkLB PrinsenCAC PatrickDL AlonsoJ BouterLM De VetHCW TerweeCB COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) user manual Version 1.0 [Internet] 2018 [cited 2023 Jan 10]. Available from:https://cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-syst-review-for-PROMs-manual_version-1_feb-2018.pdf - Hosseini Tabaghdehi M, Keramat A, Shahhosseini Z, Kolahdozan S, Moosazadeh M, Motaghi Z. Development and psychometric properties of Iranian women childbirth experience questionnaire. Nursing Open. 2021;8(3):1360–1368. doi: 10.1002/nop2.752.
- Smith LFP. Development of a multidimensional labour satisfaction questionnaire: Dimensions, validity, and internal reliability. Quality Health Care. 2001;10:17–22.
- Pozo-Cano MD, Martín-Salvador A, Pérez-Morente MÁ, Martínez-García E, Luna del Castillo JD, Gázquez-López M, et al. Validation of the Women’s Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ4) in the Spanish population. Int J Environ Res Publ Health. 2020;17(15). doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155582.
- Carquillat P, Vendittelli F, Perneger T, Guittier MJ. Development of a Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1462-x.
- Rodríguez Coll P, Casañas R, Collado Palomares A, Maldonado Aubian G, Salgado Poveda MI, Espada-Trespalacios X, et al. Validation and psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE). Sexual. 2021;27. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2020.100584.
- Dencker A, Taft C, Bergqvist L, Lilja H, Berg M. Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): Development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.
- Abbaspoor Z, Moghaddam Banaem L, Ronaghi S, Dencker A. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in Iran. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2019;24(4):296–300. doi: 10.4103/ijnmr.IJNMR_103_18.
- Mamuk R, Şahin N, Dişsiz M. The Turkish Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ): Reliability and validity assessment. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi. 2019;15(4):265–271. doi: 10.4274/BTDMJB.galenos.2019.20190123082356.
- Kazemi S, Dencker A, Pazandeh F, Montazeri A, Sedigh-Mobarakabadi S, Hajian S. Psychometric evaluation of the Persian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Biomed Res Int. 2020;6879283. doi: 10.1155/2020/6879283.S.
- Patabendige M, Palihawadana TS, Herath RP, Wijesinghe PS. Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in the Sri Lankan setting: Translation, cultural adaptation and validation into the Sinhala language. BMC Res Notes. 2020;13(1). doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05380-z.
- da Silva Vieira RCM., Ferreira CHJ, de Carvalho Cavalli R, do Prado MLR, Beleza ACS, Driusso P. Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20:477. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03163-9.
- Boie S, Lauridsen HH, Glavind J, Smed MK, Uldbjerg N, Bor P. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ)—validation of its use in a Danish-speaking population of new mothers stimulated with oxytocin during labour. PLoS ONE 2020;15(5):e0233122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233122.
- Parchaa T, Togoobaatar G, Fukuzawa RK, Chunagsuren B, Tseleejav B, Nyam N, Katsumata AT. Translation and validation of the Mongolian version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. J Patient Exp. 2021; 8:23743735211060636. doi: 10.1177/23743735211060636.
- Kalok A, Nordin N, Sharip S, Abdul Rahman R, Shah SA, Abdullah Mahdy Z, Kamisan Atan I. Psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ-My). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7644. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137644.
- Marques MJP, Zangão O, Miranda L, Sim-Sim M. Childbirth Experience Questionnaire: Cross-cultural validation and psychometric evaluation for European Portuguese. Womens Health (Lond). 2022;18:17455057221128121. doi: 10.1177/17455057221128121.
- Zhu X, Wang Y, Zhou H, Qiu L, Pang R. Adaptation of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ) in China: A multisite crosssectional study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(4):e0215373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215373.
- Dencker A, Bergqvist L, Berg M, Greenbrook JTV, Nilsson C, Lundgren I. Measuring women’s experiences of decision-making and aspects of midwifery support: A confirmatory factor analysis of the revised Childbirth Experience Questionnaire. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02869-0.
- Ghanbari-Homayi S, Dencker A, Fardiazar Z, Jafarabadi M A, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Meedya S, et al. Validation of the Iranian version of the childbirth experience questionnaire 2.0. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1). doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2606-y.
- Walker KF, Dencker A, Thornton JG. Childbirth experience questionnaire 2: Validating its use in the United Kingdom. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;5:100097. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2019.100097.
- Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2014;30(6):610–619. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006.
- Jefford E, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Development and validation of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2018;36(1):42–58. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2017.1396302.
- Škodová Z, Nepelová Z, Grendár M, Bašková M. Psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019;79. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102550.
- Romero-Gonzalez B, Peralta-Ramirez MI, Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Cambil-Ledesma A, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery. 2019;70:31–37. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009.
- Skvirsky V, Taubman–ben-ari O, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Validation of the Hebrew Birth Satisfaction Scale – Revised (BSS-R) and its relationship to perceived traumatic labour. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2020;38(2):214–220. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2019.1600666.
- Martin CR, Jefford E, Hollins Martin CJ. Crisis, what crisis? Replicability of the key measurement characteristics of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale—Revised. Int J Childbirth. 2020;10(3):140–150. doi: 10.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-20-00006.
- Nasiri S, Kariman N, Ozgoli G. Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised. J Res Med Sci. 2020;25:90. doi: 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_248_19.
- Nespoli A, Colciago E, Fumagalli S, Locatelli A, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Validation and factor structure of the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;39(5):516–531. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2020.1836333.
- Omani-Samani R, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR, Maroufizadeh S, Ghaheri A, Navid B. The Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised Indicator (BSS-RI): A validation study in Iranian mothers. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021:34(11):1827–1831. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1651265.
- Mortazavi F, Mehrabadi M, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Psychometric properties of the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R) in a sample of postpartum Iranian women. Health Care Women Int. 2021;42(4–6):836–851. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2020.1802464.
- Zafar S, Tayyab F, Liaqat A, Sikander S, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised in Urdu for use in Pakistan. Int J Childbirth. 2021;11(2):72–83. doi: 10.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-21-00001.
- Emmens B, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021;1–15. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2021.1979200.
- Radoš NS, Matijaš M, Brekalo M, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Further validation of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised: Factor structure, validity, and reliability. Curr Psychol. 2022; 42:13693–13702. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02688-2.
- Anikwe Ch, Osita US, Mbanefo OP, Asiegbu OGK, Nnadozie UU, Eleje GU, et al. The Birth Satisfaction Scale: Igbo adaptation, validation, and reliability study. Qeios ID: GOVO55, 2022. doi:10.32388/GOVO55.2.
- Özdemir Gökmen Ö, Erbil N, Demirbağ B. Adaptation of Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised to Turkish society. Middle Black Sea J Health Scien. 2022;8(4):490–505. doi: 10.19127/mbsjohs.1080337.
- Ratislavová K, Hendrych Lorenzová E, Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. Translation and validation of the Czech Republic version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2022;1–17. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2022.2067837.
- 42.
WHO. Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: WHO recommendations. Geneva: World Health Organization [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 July 20]. Available from:
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215 WHO Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: WHO recommendations Geneva World Health Organization [Internet] 2018 [cited 2023 July 20]. Available from:https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215 - Nijagal MA, Wissig S, Stowell C, Olson E, Amer-Wahlin I, Bonsel G, et al. Standardized outcome measures for pregnancy and childbirth, ICHOM proposal. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1). doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3732-3.
- Hollins Martin CJ, Martinez LJ, Martin CR. Measuring women’s experiences of childbirth using the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Br J Midwifery. 2020;28(5):306–312. doi: 10.12968/bjom.2020.28.5.306.
- Hollins Martin CJ, Martin CR. The Birth Satisfaction Consortium [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2023 July 20]. Available from:
https://www.bss-r.co.uk/about/ - Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, Alonso J, Patrick DL, de Vet HCW, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3.
- Kahalon R, Preis H, Benyamini Y. Who benefits most from skin-to-skin mother-infant contact after birth? Survey findings on skin-to-skin and birth satisfaction by mode of birth. Midwifery. 2021;92. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102862.
Language: English
Page range: 100 - 108
Submitted on: Sep 15, 2023
Accepted on: Jan 7, 2024
Published on: Mar 20, 2024
Published by: National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2024 Kateřina Ratislavová, Jana Horová, Patrice Marek, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.