References
- Bilo MB, Pravettoni V, Bignardi D, Bonadonna P, Mauro M, Novembre E, et al. Hymenoptera venom allergy: management of children and adults in clinical practice. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2019;29(3):180–205. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0310.
- Casale TB, Burks AW. Clinical practice. Hymenoptera-sting hypersensitivity. N Eng J Med. 2014;10;370(15):1432–1439. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1302681.
- Bilo MB, Tontini C, Martini M, Corsi A, Agolini S, Antonicelli L. Clinical aspects of Hymenoptera venom allergy and venom immunotherapy. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;51(6):244–258. doi: 10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.113.
- Blank S, Haemmerle S, Jaeger T, Russkamp D, Ring J, Schmidt-Weber CB, et al. Prevalence of Hymenoptera venom allergy and sensitization in the population-representative German KORA cohort. Allergo J Int. 2019;28(6):183–191. doi: 10.1007/s40629-018-0089-4.
- Becerril-Angeles M, Nuñez-Velázquez M, Grupo del Programa de Control de la Abeja Africanizada, SAGARPA. [Risk factors for allergy to honey-bee venom in Mexican beekeepers]. Rev Alerg Mex. 2013;60(3):100–104.
- Ediger D, Terzioglu K, Ozturk RT. Venom allergy, risk factors for systemic reactions and the knowledge levels among Turkish beekeepers. Asia Pac Allergy. 2018;8(2):e15. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2018.8.e15.
- Richter AG, Nightingale P, Huissoon AP, Krishna MT. Risk factors for systemic reactions to a bee venom in British beekeepers. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;106(2):159–163. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.11.005.
- Carli T, Locatelli I, Košnik M, Kukec A. Epidemiology and risk factors of self-reported systemic allergic reactions to a Hymenoptera venom in beekeepers: A protocol for a systematic literature review of epidemiological observational studies in beekeepers worldwide. BMJ Open. 2022;12(7):1–5. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058130.
- Münstedt K, Hellner M, Winter D, von Georgi R. Allergy to bee venom in beekeepers in Germany. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2008;18(2):100–105.
- Prattala R, Helasoja V, Laaksonen M, Laatikainen T, Nikander P, Puska P. CINDI health monitor. Proposal for practical guidelines. Helsinki: Publications of the National Public Health Institute [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 Apr 27]. Available from:
https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/78046/2001b14.pdf;sequence=1 - Fernandez-Gomez E, Martin-Salvador A, Luque-Vara T, Sanchez-Ojeda MA, Navarro-Prado S, Enrique-Miron C. Content validation through expert judgement of an instrument on the nutritional knowledge, beliefs, and habits of pregnant women. Nutrients. 2020;12(4):1136. doi: 10.3390/nu12041136.
- McGartland Rubio D, Berg-Weger M, Tebb SS, Lee ES, Rauch S. Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Soc Work Res. 2003;27(2):94–104. doi: 10.1093/swr/27.2.94.
- Davis KA. Validity and reliability in qualitative research on second language: Acquisition and teaching. Another Researcher Comments. TESOL Q. 1992;26(3):605–608. doi: 10.2307/3587190.
- Yusoff MSB. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Med Educ. 2019;11(2):49–54. doi: 10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6.
- Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar A-R. Design and implementation content validity study: Development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci. 2015;4(2):165–178. doi: 10.15171/jcs.2015.017.
- Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–497. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
- Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(3):269–274. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199706)20:3<;269:aid-nur9>3.0.co;2-g.
- Hambleton RK, Swaminathan H, Algina J, Coulson D. Criterion-referenced testing and measurement: A review of technical issues and developments. Rev Educ Res. 1978;48:1–47. doi: 10.3102/00346543048001001.
- Slovenian Beekeepers Association. General information [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 13]. Available from:
https://en.czs.si/about/general-information/ - Yusoff MSB. ABC of response process validation and face validity index calculation. Med Educ. 2019;11(3):55–61. doi: 10.21315/eimj2019.11.3.6.
- Sin BE, Öztuna D, Gelincik A, Gürlek F, Baysan A, Sin AZ, et al. Quality-of-life in insect venom allergy: Validation of the Turkish version of the “Vespid Allergy Quality of Life Questionnaire” (VQLQ-T). Springerplus. 2016;5:583. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2246-x.
- Elangovan N, Sundaravel E. Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by expertes. MethodsX. 2021;8:101326. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326.
- Rolstad S, Adler J, Rydén A. Respone burden and questionnaire length: Is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis. Value Health. 2011;14(8):1101–1108. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003.
- Annila IT, Karjalainen ES, Annila PA, Kuusisto PA. Bee and wasp sting reactions in current beekeepers. Ann Alergy Asthma Immunol. 1996;77(5):423–427. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63342-X.
- Celikel S, Karakaya G, Yurtsever N, Sorkun K, Falyoncu AF. Bee and bee products allergy in Turkish beekeepers: determination of risk factors for systemic reactions. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr.). 2006;34(5):180–184. doi: 10.1157/13094024.
- Morton LM, Cahill J, Hartge P. Reporting participation in epidemiologic studies: A survey of practice. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;163(3):197–203. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj036.
- Blumenberg C, Menezes AMB, Gonçalves H, Formoso Assunçao MC, Wehrmeister FC, Barros FC, et al. The role of questionnaire length and reminders frequency on response rates to a web-based epidemiologic study: A randomised trial. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2019;22(6):626–635. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2019.1629755.
- Beekeeping Academy of Slovenia. Beekeeping in Slovenia [Internet]. 2012 [Cited 2023 Mar 17]. Available from:
https://sca.kis.si/en/slovenian-beekeeping/ - Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35(6):382–385.
- Jokiniemi K, Meretoja R, Pietilä AM. Constructing content validity of clinical nurse specialist core competencies: Exploratory sequential mixed-method study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018;32(4):1428–1436. doi: 10.1111/scs.12588.
- Chang L. A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point Likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Appl Psychol Meas; 1994:18(3):205–215. doi: 10.1177/01466216940180030.
- Polit DF, Tatano Beck C, Owen SVV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–467. doi: 10.1002/nur.20199.
- Rodrigues IB, Adachi JD, Beattle KA, MacDermid JC. Development and validation of a new tool to measure the facilitators, barriers and preferences to exercise in people with osteoporosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1914-5.
- Almanasreh E, Moles R, Chen TF. Evaluation of methods used for estimating content validity. Resocial Adm Phar. 2019;15(2):214–221. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2018.03.066.