Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fall Risk in Adult Family Practice Non-Attenders: A Cross-Sectional Study from Slovenia Cover

Fall Risk in Adult Family Practice Non-Attenders: A Cross-Sectional Study from Slovenia

Open Access
|Mar 2023

Figures & Tables

Supplementary Figure 1.

Sensitivity analysis − Logarithm of odds for an increased fall risk (black line) with 95% confidence intervals (grey area) in the multivariate logistic model without covariate dependence in daily activities (Supplementary Table 3), where the other variables in the model are fixed to their modes or medians (gender to female, age to 62.7, systolic blood pressure to 130, diastolic blood pressure to 72, self-assessment of current health to 8, and all the others to values indicating a healthy individual).
Sensitivity analysis − Logarithm of odds for an increased fall risk (black line) with 95% confidence intervals (grey area) in the multivariate logistic model without covariate dependence in daily activities (Supplementary Table 3), where the other variables in the model are fixed to their modes or medians (gender to female, age to 62.7, systolic blood pressure to 130, diastolic blood pressure to 72, self-assessment of current health to 8, and all the others to values indicating a healthy individual).

Figure 1.

Logarithm of odds for an increased fall risk (black line) with 95% confidence intervals (grey area) in the multivariate logistic model (Table 3).
Logarithm of odds for an increased fall risk (black line) with 95% confidence intervals (grey area) in the multivariate logistic model (Table 3).

Comparison of the outcome (fall risk) and demographic characteristics between the subsample used in the multivariate model for fall risk (n=1,474) and the subsample that was omitted from the model on the account of missing values for the covariates in the model (n=471)_ Note that there were no missing values regarding the outcome or demographic characteristics_

CharacteristicSubsample used in the model (n=1,474)Subsample omitted from the model (n=471)
Increased fall risk, n (%)382 (25.9)100 (21.2)
Gender: female, n (%)941 (63.8)289 (61.4)
Age (years), median (IQR)62.7 (41.6 - 77.6)60.4 (43.3 - 74.2)

Multivariate logistic model for fall risk - interpretable coefficients: sample size n=1474 with 382 (25_9%) with increased fall risk, AUC=0_938 (bias-corrected 0_930), pseudo R2=64_0% (bias-corrected 61_0%), calibration curve based on the out-of-bag samples with intercept -0_048 and slope 0_917, likelihood ratio test p<0_001_

VariableOR95% CIp value
Age <0.001
  Nonlinear 0.157
Gender (female vs. male)1.08[0.74, 1.59]0.672
Body mass index 0.096
  Underweight vs. normal0.70[0.27, 1.81]0.472
  Overweight vs. normal0.84[0.54, 1.29]0.423
  Obese vs. normal1.43[0.90, 2.28]0.133
Systolic blood pressure 0.047
  Nonlinear 0.019
Diastolic blood pressure 0.740
  Nonlinear 0.611
Poor family function1.87[1.12, 3.11]0.016
Increased risk of malnutrition2.09[1.17, 3.73]0.013
Chronic diseases 0.027
  1 disease vs. no disease1.33[0.82, 2.15]0.251
  2 diseases vs. no disease1.83[1.09, 3.09]0.023
  3 or more diseases vs. no disease2.25[1.26, 4.05]0.006
Pain intensity <0.001
  Nonlinear 0.429
Self-assessment of current health 0.002
  Nonlinear 0.001
Feelings of loneliness 0.108
  Nonlinear 0.037
Dependence in daily activities with transformation log216.22[9.04, 30.83]<0.001

Multivariate logistic model for fall risk - all coefficients: sample size n=1,474 with 382 (25_9%) with increased fall risk, AUC=0_938 (bias-corrected 0_930), pseudo R2=64_0% (bias-corrected 61_0%), calibration curve based on the out-of-bag samples with intercept -0_048 and slope 0_917, likelihood ratio test p<0_001_

VariableOR95% CIp value
Age <0.001
  Linear term1.12[1.02, 1.26]0.027
  Nonlinear term 10.85[0.65, 1.07]0.177
  Nonlinear term 21.63[0.89, 3.12]0.123
Gender (female vs. male)1.08[0.74, 1.59]0.672
Body mass index 0.096
  Underweight vs. normal0.70[0.27, 1.81]0.472
  Overweight vs. normal0.84[0.54, 1.29]0.423
  Obese vs. normal1.43[0.90, 2.28]0.133
Systolic blood pressure 0.047
  Linear term0.95[0.90, 1.01]0.096
  Nonlinear term 11.08[0.90, 1.30]0.386
  Nonlinear term 20.86[0.43, 1.74]0.673
Diastolic blood pressure 0.740
  Linear term1.02[0.95, 1.09]0.607
  Nonlinear term 11.00[0.81, 1.22]0.985
  Nonlinear term 20.95[0.54, 1.69]0.861
Poor family function1.87[1.12, 3.11]0.016
Increased risk of malnutrition2.09[1.17, 3.73]0.013
Chronic diseases 0.027
  1 disease vs. no disease1.33[0.82, 2.15]0.251
  2 diseases vs. no disease1.83[1.09, 3.09]0.023
  3 or more diseases vs. no disease2.25[1.26, 4.05]0.006
Pain intensity <0.001
  Linear term1.12[0.83, 1.51]0.448
  Nonlinear term 11.43[0.59, 3.51]0.429
Self-assessment of current health 0.002
  Linear term1.16[0.88, 1.54]0.300
  Nonlinear term 10.87[0.51, 1.50]0.619
  Nonlinear term 20.10[0.00, 4.35]0.241
Feelings of loneliness 0.108
  Linear term0.74[0.56, 0.98]0.036
  Nonlinear term 12.89[1.08, 7.89]0.037
Dependence in daily activities with transformation log216.22[9.04, 30.83]<0.001

Increased fall risk according to the demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics of the participants (categorical variables)_

Characteristic (n=number of non-missing values) All participants n (%)Participants with increased fall risk n (%)Participants without increased fall risk n (%)
Gender:(n=1,945)Female1,230 (63.2)324 (26.3)906 (73.7)
Male715 (36.8)158 (22.1)557 (77.9)
Body mass index:(n=1,916)Underweight116 (6.1)34 (29.3)82 (70.7)
Normal687 (35.9)158 (23.0)529 (77.0)
Overweight678 (35.4)154 (22.7)524 (77.3)
Obese435 (22.7)124 (28.5)311 (71.5)
Family function:(n=1,931)Poor232 (12.0)104 (44.8)128 (55.2)
Good1,699 (88.0)373 (22.0)1,326 (78.0)
Increased risk of malnutrition:(n=1,577)Yes211 (13.4)84 (39.8)127 (60.2)
No1,366 (86.6)345 (25.3)1,021 (74.7)
Chronic diseases:(n=1,921)No diseases1,054 (54.9)92 (8.7)962 (91.3)
1 disease421 (21.9)140 (33.3)281 (66.7)
2 diseases261 (13.6)123 (47.1)138 (52.9)
3 or more diseases185 (9.6)117 (63.2)68 (36.8)
Cardiovascular disease:(n=1,939)Yes247 (12.7)162 (65.6)85 (34.4)
No1,692 (87.3)318 (18.8)1,374 (81.2)
Diabetes:(n=1,943)Yes208 (10.7)94 (45.2)114 (54.8)
No1,735 (89.3)387 (22.3)1,348 (77.7)
Hypertension:(n=1,942)Yes621 (32.0)289 (46.5)332 (53.5)
No1,321 (68.0)192 (14.5)1,129 (85.5)
COPD:(n=1,943)Yes49 (2.5)28 (57.1)21 (42.9)
No1,894 (97.5)453 (23.9)1,441 (76.1)
Asthma:(n=1,943)Yes55 (2.8)28 (50.9)27 (49.1)
No1,888 (97.2)453 (24.0)1,435 (76.0)
Depression:(n=1,943)Yes82 (4.2)38 (46.3)44 (53.7)
No1,861 (95.8)443 (23.8)1,418 (76.2)
Osteoporosis:(n=1,942)Yes89 (4.6)54 (60.7)35 (39.3)
No1,853 (95.4)426 (23.0)1,427 (77.0)
Benign prostatic hyperplasia:(n=1,930)Yes30 (1.6)13 (43.3)17 (56.7)
No1,900 (98.4)462 (24.3)1,438 (75.7)
Obesity:(n=1,943)Yes110 (5.7)38 (34.5)72 (65.5)
No1,833 (94.3)443 (24.2)1,390 (75.8)
Colon cancer:(n=1,943)Yes17 (0.9)7 (41.2)10 (58.8)
No1,926 (99.1)474 (24.6)1,452 (75.4)
Breast cancer:(n=1,942)Yes24 (1.2)8 (33.3)16 (66.7)
No1,918 (98.8)473 (24.7)1,445 (75.3)
Neurological diseases (excl. dementia):(n=1,945)Yes20 (1.0)16 (80.0)4 (20.0)
No1,925 (99.0)466 (24.2)1,459 (75.8)
Dementia:(n=1,945)Yes23 (1.2)22 (95.7)1 (4.3)
No1,922 (98.8)460 (23.9)1,462 (76.1)

Increased fall risk according to the demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics of the participants (numerical variables)_

Characteristic (n=number of non-missing values)All participants Median (IQR)Participants with increased fall risk Median (IQR)Participants without increased fall risk Median (IQR)
Age (years)(n=1945)61.880.554.3
(42.1, 76.5)(69.4, 87.2)(38.6, 67.8)
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)(n=1,930)130130125
(120, 140)(120, 141.5)(115, 136.2)
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)(n=1,930)757575
(70, 80)(70, 80)(70, 80)
Pain intensity (scale 1-10)(n=1,918)131
(1, 3)(2, 5)(1, 2)
Self-assessment of current health (scale 1-10)(n=1,932)858
(5, 9)(4, 7)(6, 9)
Feeling of loneliness (scale 1-10)(n=1,917)121
(1, 3)(1, 5)(1, 2)
Dependence in daily activities (scale 1-4 in steps of 0.125)(n=1,922)11.21
(1, 1)(1.1, 1.8)(1, 1)

Sensitivity analysis - Multivariate logistic model for fall risk without covariate dependence in daily activities, showing only interpretable coefficients: sample size n=1,474 with 382 (25_9%) with increased fall risk, AUC=0_910 (bias-corrected 0_900), pseudo R2=57_0% (bias-corrected 53_9%), calibration curve based on the out-of-bag samples with intercept -0_036 and slope 0_922, likelihood ratio test p<0_001_

VariableOR95% CIp value
Age <0.001
  Nonlinear 0.001
Gender (female vs. male)0.84[0.59, 1.18]0.312
Body mass index 0.117
  Underweight vs. normal1.22[0.52, 2.82]0.642
  Overweight vs. normal0.75[0.50, 1.12]0.158
  Obese vs. normal1.23[0.80, 1.89]0.337
Systolic blood pressure 0.058
  Nonlinear 0.033
Diastolic blood pressure 0.575
  Nonlinear 0.606
Poor family function1.87[1.18, 2.96]0.008
Increased risk of malnutrition1.86[1.11, 3.11]0.018
Chronic diseases <0.001
  1 disease vs. no disease1.59[1.02, 2.47]0.040
  2 diseases vs. no disease2.29[1.42, 3.72]0.001
  3 or more diseases vs. no disease3.79[2.25, 6.46]<0.001
Pain intensity <0.001
  Nonlinear 0.572
Self-assessment of current health <0.001
  Nonlinear 0.003
Feelings of loneliness 0.596
  Nonlinear 0.310
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026
Language: English
Page range: 76 - 86
Submitted on: Jun 9, 2022
|
Accepted on: Dec 22, 2022
|
Published on: Mar 15, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Nina RUŽIĆ-GORENJEC, Zalika KLEMENC KETIŠ, Rok BLAGUS, Antonija POPLAS SUSIČ, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.