Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Psychosocial work environment risk factors among university employees – A cross-sectional study in Hungary Cover

Psychosocial work environment risk factors among university employees – A cross-sectional study in Hungary

Open Access
|Dec 2020

Figures & Tables

Psychosocial principle components (1, 2, 4) by sex_

VariablesSex
P-value*
MaleFemale

Mean rankMean rank
Job demands (1)141.69125.070.095
Autonomy (2)147.54122.230.011
Negative social interactions (4)120.89135.170.151

Work environment characteristics resulting from the principal component analysis; the incidence of individual components in the complete sample_

Variablesn (%)Component loadsDefined varianceCronbach’s alpha
Component 1: Job demands 14.7120.796
strict deadlines80.40.777
difficulty in meeting requirements56.70.760
frequent overwork64.20.730
intensity of work45.80.675
communication problems47.50.612
Component 2: Autonomy 13.1780.757
possibility of independent decisions80.80.846
work requiring many autonomous ideas and inventiveness87.70.819
possibility of utilising own knowledge and skills84.70.707
possibility of job promotion56.50.600
Component 3: Biological, chemical agents 12.1480.622
accident risks22.60.760
infection risks34.20.749
lifting heavy objects, uncomfortable posture12.60.731
chemicals, dust, gas, smoke, steam27.60.615
Component 4: Negative social interactions 10.9080.739
violent behaviour of colleagues11.50.823
discrimination12.30.806
bullying17.20.710
Component 5: Physical agents9.2 9.7900.590
effects of heat13.40.859
effects of radiation37.90.720
noise, vibration 0.548

Socio-demographic characteristics of the research sample_

Variables n (%)
Sexmale86 (33.0)
female175 (67.0)
Age groups (years)20–2923 (8.8)
30–3987 (33.3)
40–4976 (29.1)
50–5956 (21.5)
60–19 (7.3)
Marital statusmarried or partnership182 (69.8)
divorced31 (11.9)
single45 (17.2)
widowed3 (1.1)
Level of educationsecondary25 (9.5)
higher236 (90.5)

The association between psychosocial principal components (1, 2, 4) and relationships at and the satisfaction with work_

Variables Job demands (1)
Autonomy (2)
Negative social interactions (4)
n (%)Mean rankP-value*Mean rankP-value*Mean rankP-value*
Relationship to colleagues 0.099 0.052 0.0001
A) Harmonious, they can work well together.91 (34.9)121.37 139.01 118.70
B) They usually get along well with each other.141 (54.4)130.62 132.08 128.18
C) There are greater or lesser disputes.24 (9.2)164.56 97.81 169.60
D) Conflicts, with frequent disputes.4 (1.5)129.75 77.50 246.00
Relationship to superiors 0.018 0.0022 0.0043
A) Harmonious, they can work well together.102 (39.1)114.47 149.12 124.97
B) They usually get along well with each other.119 (46.0)135.51 121.59 123.30
C) There are greater or lesser disputes.27 (10.3)155.98 124.61 153.50
D) Conflicts, with frequent disputes.12 (4.6)159.75 73.83 197.17
Financial appreciation 0.0054 0.0015 0.0226
A) yes58 (22.2)106.87 149.96 112.27
B) partly123 (47.5)129.61 137.09 128.04
C) no79 (30.3)149.24 105.96 147.71
Professional appreciation 0.0007 0.0008 0.061
A) yes119 (46.0)109.04 156.97 125.28
B) partly108 (41.4)149.61 114.62 127.44
C) no33 (12.6)145.33 87.03 159.33
Moral appreciation 0.0009 0.00110 0.00011
A) yes145 (55.9)113.63 143.69 118.02
B) partly86 (33.0)148.37 122.76 131.62
C) no29 (11.1)161.83 87.52 189.59
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2021-0003 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 16
Submitted on: Nov 20, 2019
|
Accepted on: Oct 8, 2020
|
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2020 Veronika Mátó, Klára Tarkó, László Lippai, László Nagymajtényi, Edit Paulik, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.