Physicians’ Attitudes toward Adolescent Confidentiality Services: Scale Development and Validation

Vida Jeremić Stojković; Smiljana Cvjetković; Bojana Matejić

doi:10.2478/sjph-2020-0013

Abstract

Introduction

Confidentiality is one of the oldest ethical principles in healthcare. However, confidentiality in adolescent healthcare is not a universally-accepted doctrine among scholars. The ethical acceptability of confidential services in adolescents’ healthcare is based on perceptions of adolescent maturity and an appreciation of its importance to adolescents’ access and utilization of healthcare services. Despite legal policies that promote adolescents’ rights, physicians’ attitudes toward adolescent confidentiality can be a determining factor in their ultimate decision to protect adolescents’ confidentiality.

Method

A new Attitude towards Adolescent Confidentiality Scale was developed based on the results of a qualitative interview study. This new instrument was administered to a sample of 152 physicians working at school pediatric and gynecology departments in 13 primary healthcare institutions in Belgrade. Principal component analysis was applied to determine the main components of the scale. Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach alpha and mean inter-item correlations.

Results

Psychometric analysis of the final 19-item version of the scale showed a high level of reliability (Cronbach alpha of 0.83). Principal component analysis showed four components, which present subscales of the instrument: Confidentiality in clinical situation, Iimportance of confidentiality, Adolescent maturity, and Communication with parents.

Conclusions

The instrument showed satisfactory levels of reliability and validity. The results of the scale dissemination may be a valuable tool for needs assessment for future educational interventions and training programs that will raise physicians’ awareness of the importance of adolescent confidentiality.

References

Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013:316.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Spear S, English A. Protecting confidentiality to safeguard adolescents” health: finding common ground. Contraception. 2007;76:73–6.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weithorn LA, Campbell SB. The competency of children and adolescents to make informed treatment decisions. Child Develop. 1982;53:1589–98.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steinberg L, Cauffman E. Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision-making. Law Human Behav. 1996;20:249–72.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Iltis AS. Parents, adolescents, and consent for research participation. J Med Philosophy. 2013;38:332–46.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Partridge BC. The mature minor: some critical psychological reflections on the empirical bases. J Med Philosophy. 2013;38:283–99.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lehrer JA, Pantell R, Tebb K, Shafer M. Forgone health care among U.S. adolescents: associations between risk characteristics and confidentiality concern. J Adolesc Health. 2007;40:218–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.09.015.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Brittain AW, Williams JR, Zapata LB, Pazol K, Romero LM, Weik TS. Youth-friendly family planning services for young people: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49:S73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.019.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Freud A. Adolescence. Psychoanal Study Child. 1958;13:255–78.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Blos P. The second individuation process of adolescence. Psychoanal Study Child. 1967;22:162–86.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Margolis GJ. Secrecy and identity. Int J Psychoanal. 1996;47:517–22.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McElhaney KB, Allen JP. Sociocultural perspectives on adolescent autonomy. In Kerig PK, Schulz MS, Hauser ST, editors. Adolescence and beyond: family processes and development. Oxford: University Press, 2012:161–76.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stultiëns L, Goffin T, Borry P, Dierickx K, Nys H. Minors and informed consent: a comparative approach. Eur J Health Law. 2007;14:21–46. doi: 10.1163/092902707X182788.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaruseviciene L, Levasseur G, Liljestrand J. Confidentiality for adolescents seeking reproductive health care in Lithuania: the perceptions of general practitioners. Reprod Health Matter. 2006;14:129–37. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(06)27224-0.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pérez-Cárceles MD, Pereñiguez JE, Osuna E, Pérez-Flores D, Luna A. Primary care confidentiality for Spanish adolescents: fact or fiction? J Med Ethics. 2006;32:329–34. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.011932.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deneyer M, Devroey D, De Groot E, Buyl R, Clybouw C, Vandenplas Y. Informative privacy and confidentiality for adolescents: the attitude of the Flemish paediatrician anno 2010. Eur J Pediatr. 2011;170:1159–63. doi: 10.1007/s00431-011-1427-4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
McKee MD, Rubin SE, Campos G, O’Sullivan LF. Challenges of providing confidential care to adolescents in urban primary care: clinician perspectives. Ann Fam Med. 2011;9:37–43.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Riley M, Ahmed S, Reed BD, Quint EH. Physician knowledge and attitudes around confidential care for minor patients. J Pediatr Adol Gynecol. 2015;28:234–39. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2014.08.008.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Wadman R, Thul D, Elliott AS, Kennedy AP, Mitchell I, Pinzon JL. Adolescent confidentiality: understanding and practices of health care providers. Paediatric Child Health. 2014;19:e11–4.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jeremic VS, Matejic B, Turza K. Serbian primary care physicians’ perspectives on adolescents’ right to confidentiality in sexual and reproductive healthcare-a qualitative interview study. Fam Pract. 2019;36:317–24. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy067.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hofmann AD. A rational policy toward consent and confidentiality in adolescent health care. J Adolesc Health Care. 1980;1:9–17.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cook RJ, Erdman JN, Dickens BM. Respecting adolescents’ confidentiality and reproductive and sexual choices. Int J Gynecol Obstetrics. 2007;98:182–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Klemenc-Ketis Z, Vrecko H. Development and validation of a professionalism assessment scale for medical students. Int J Med Educ. 2014;5:205.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. Multivariate data analysis, 7th ed. New York: Upper Saddle River, Prentice-Hall, 2010:117.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:309–19.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychol Assess. 1996;8:350–3.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ford C, English A, Sigman G. Confidential health care for adolescents: position paper of the Society for Adolescent Medicine. J Adolesc Health. 2004;35:160–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
American Academy of Pediatrics. Confidentiality protections for adolescents and young adults in the health care billing and insurance claims process. J Adolesc Health. 2016;58:374–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
American Medical Association. AMA code of medical ethics. Opinion 5.055 confidential care for minors. Accessed 19 December, 2019 at: https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/ama-code-medical-ethics-opinion-adolescent-care/2014-11.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Šahović NV, Savić I. The rights of the child in Serbia. In: Cvejic O, editor. The rights of the child in a changing world. Cham: Springer, 2016:251–62.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
European Commission. Evaluation of legislation, policy and practice on child participation in European Union (EU) - final report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015. Accessed January 2019 at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/f425176f-cc2c-46bd8a3a-65d958fff780.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jeremic V, Sénécal K, Borry P, Chokoshvili D, Vears DF. Participation of children in medical decision-making: challenges and potential solutions. J Bioeth Inq. 2016;13:525–34. doi: 10.1007/s11673-016-9747-8.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Copen CE, Dittus PJ, Leichliter JS. Confidentiality concerns and sexual and reproductive health care among adolescents and young adults aged 15–25. NCHS Data Brief. 2016;15:18–9.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fuentes L, Ingerick M, Jones R, Lindberg L. Adolescents’ and young adults’ reports of barriers to confidential health care and receipt of contraceptive services. J Adolesc Health. 2018;62:36–43. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.10.011.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaruseviciene L, Lazarus JV, Zaborskis A. Confidentiality and parental involvement in adolescent sexual and reproductive health care: a cross-sectional study of Lithuanian general practitioners. Scan J Public Health. 2011;39:484–91.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Hobcraft G, Baker T. Special needs of adolescent and young women in accessing reproductive health: promoting partnerships between young people and health care providers. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2006;94:350–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.04.024.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Carlisle J, Shickle D, Cork M, McDonagh A. Concerns over confidentiality may deter adolescents from consulting their doctors: a qualitative exploration. J Med Ethics. 2006;32(3):133–7.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Coker TR, Sareen HG, Chung PJ. Improving access to and utilization of adolescent preventive health care: the perspectives of adolescents and parents. J Adolesc Health. 2010;47:133–42.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mundfrom DJ, Shaw DG, Ke TL. Minimum sample size recommendations for conducting factor analyses. Int J Test. 2005;5:159–68. doi: 10.1207/s15327574ijt0502_4.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia. Women and man in the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade: Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, 2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
World Health Organization. Evaluation of the organization and provision of primary care in Serbia. Copenhagen: The WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2010.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article