Predicting Equations and Resting Energy Expenditure Changes in Overweight Adults Cover

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

Predicting Equations and Resting Energy Expenditure Changes in Overweight Adults

Slovenian Journal of Public Health

Volume 59 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

By: Mojca Stubelj, Kaja Teraž and Tamara Poklar Vatovec

Open Access

|Dec 2019

Figures & Tables

Comparison of different methods for determining female subjects’ REE before and after the 6-month intervention.Legend: REE, measured resting energy expenditure; HB, Harris–Benedict’s method; MSJ, Mifflin–St Jeor’s method; O, Owen’s method; W, Wright’s method.* The difference before and after the intervention was statistically significant in females at the level of p<0.05.

Comparison of different methods for determining male subjects’ REE before and after the 6-month intervention.Legend: REE, measured resting energy expenditure; HB, Harris–Benedict’s method; MSJ, Mifflin–St Jeor’s method; O, Owen’s method; W, Wright’s method.* The difference before and after the intervention was statistically significant in males at the level of p<0.05.

Bland–Altman plot showing the agreement between predicted REE with Owen (O) equation and measured REE for female.

Bland–Altman plot showing the agreement between predicted REE with Mifflin–St Jeor (MSJ) equation and measured REE for male.

Comparison of measured REE and estimated REE in females_

Measured REE vs. Method comparison	Mean difference±SD	t(p)	Pearson r (p)
Tanita	−215.9±214.7	−4.5 (0.000)^*	0.571 (0.009)^**
HB	−202.9±218.6	−4.1 (0.001)^*	0.582 (0.007)^**
MSJ	−140.5±211.2	−3.0 (0.008)^*	0.604 (0.005)^**
O	−43.6±226.1	−0.86 (0.399)	0.614 (0.004)^**
W	−173.0±218.1	−3.5 (0.002)^*	0.559 (0.010)^*

Predictive equations for estimating the REE_

Reference	Female	Male
Mifflin St Jeor [9]	(9.99 × w) + (6.25 × H) − (4.92 × A) − 161	(9.99 × W) + (6.25 × H) − (4.92 × A) + 5
Harris Benedict [19]	655.09 + (9.56 × W) + (1.84 × H) − (4.67 × A)	66.47 + (13.75 × W) + (5 × H) − (6.75 × A)
Owen et al. [21], Owen et al. [22]	(7.18 × W) + 795	(10.2 × W) + 879
Wright et al. [23]	(9.02 × W) + (5.88 × H) − 7.47 × A + 110.76	(9.27 × W) + (4.58 × H) − (6.53 × A) + 451.44
Harris Benedict adjusted from Tanita Corporation	655.10 + (9.56 × W) + (1.85 × H) − (4.68 × A)	66.47 + (13.75 × W) + (5 × H) − (6.76 × A)

Female subject’s characteristics comparison, before and after 6-month intervention_

Female (n=20)	Mean±SD		R

	Before intervention	After intervention	%
REE (kcal/day)	1400±256	1305±260	−7
REE (kJ/day)	5864±1072	5465±1089	−7
HB REE (kcal/day)	1536 ±95	1507±95^*	−2
MSJ REE (kcal/day)	1475±115	1445±116^*	−2
O REE (kcal/day)	1370±65	1348±64^*	−2
W REE (kcal/day)	1505±110	1477±111^*	−2
Tanita REE (kcal/day)	1511±122	1520±124	+1
Weight (kg)	80.1±9.1	77.0±9,0^*	−4
BMI (kg/m²)	29.1±2.7	28.0±2.6^*	−4
Fat free mass (kg)	49.3±4.0	48.3±3.9^*	−2
Total fat (kg)	30.8±5.6	28.7±5.8^*	−7

Comparison of measured REE and estimated REE in male_

Measured REE vs. Method comparison	Mean difference±SD	t(p)	Pearson r (p)
Tanita	−419.9±218.5 ^*	−6.9 (0.000)^*	0.235 (0.440)
HB	−297.4±195.9^*	−5.1 (0.000)^*	0.322 (0.284)
MSJ	0.553±181.7	0.011 (0.991)	0.373 (0.210)
O	−120.5±201.2	−2.2 (0.052)	0.094 (0.761)
W	−183.8±179.8^*	−3.7 (0.003)^*	0.377 (0.205)

Male subjects’ characteristics comparison, before and after 6-month intervention_

Male (n=13)	Mean±SD		R

	Before intervention	After intervention	%
REE (kcal/day)	1882±275	1700±191^*	−10
REE (kJ/day)	7884±1154	7123±801^*	−10
HB REE (kcal/day)	2036±144	1979±136^*	−3
MSJ REE (kcal/day)	1740±114	1699±110^*	−2
O REE (kcal/day)	1862±82	1820±83^*	−2
W REE (kcal/day)	1922±109	1884±102^*	−2
Tanita REE (kcal/day)	2161±158	2120±160	−2
Weight (kg)	96.4±8.1	92.3±8.1^*	−4
BMI (kg/m²)	29.8±2.8	28.5±2.6^*	−4
Fat free mass (kg)	72.6±4.5	71.0±4.4^*	−2
Total fat (kg)	23.5±4.9	21.3±5.7^*	−10

Characteristics of the participants_

Characteristic	Mean±SD

	Female (n=20)	Male (n=13)	Total (n=33)
Age	40.5±6.4	37.92±6.6	39.5±6.5
Height	165.7±5.2	180.0±6.5	171.3±9.1
Weight (kg)	80.1±9.1	96.4±8.1	86.5±11.8
Fat mass (%)	38.2±3.1	24.2±3.5	32.7±7.6
Fat-free mass (kg)	49.3±4.0	72.6±4.5	58.5±12.3

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2020-0005 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 33 - 41

Submitted on: May 2, 2019

|

Accepted on: Nov 5, 2019

|

Published on: Dec 13, 2019

Published by: National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

Keywords:

resting energy expenditure,

energy expenditure,

indirect calorimetry,

predictive equations

Related subjects:

Clinical medicine,

Hygiene and environmental medicine

© 2019 Mojca Stubelj, Kaja Teraž, Tamara Poklar Vatovec, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous article Volume 59 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)Next article