Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Classification of primary caesarean sections in labor and its usefulness for analysis of Slovenian perinatal data Cover

Classification of primary caesarean sections in labor and its usefulness for analysis of Slovenian perinatal data

Open Access
|Mar 2019

References

  1. EURO-PERISTAT Project. European Perinatal Health Report 2010. Accessed July 15th, 2017 at: http://www.europeristat.com
  2. Belizan JM, Althabe F, Cafferata ML. Health consequences of the increasing caesarean section rates. Epidemiol. 2007;18:485-6. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318068646a.
  3. Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120:1181-93. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182704880.
  4. Gregory KD, Jackson S, Korst L, Fridman M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol. 2012;29:7-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1285829.
  5. Bergant J, Sirc T, Lučovnik M, Verdenik I, Stopar Pintarič T. Perinatal analgesia and labour outcomes in Slovenia: a retrospective analysis of births between 2003 and 2013. Zdrav Vestn. 2016;85:83-91.
  6. Fischer A, LaCoursiere DY, Barnard P, Bloebaum L, Varner M. Differences between hospitals in cesarean rates for term primigravidas with cephalic presentation. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:816-21. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000156299.52668.e2.
  7. Robson M, Hartigan L, Murphy M. Methods of achieving and maintaining an appropriate caesarean section rate. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;27:297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.004.
  8. National Institute of Public Health. National Perinatal Information System: definitions and methodological guidelines. Accessed September 12th, 2017 at: http://www.ivz.si/podatki_metodoloska_gradiva?_5_AutoResize=false&_5_Filename=attName.png&_5_MediaId=6423&pi=5&pl=47-5.3
  9. Robson MS. Classification of cesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001;12:23-39.
  10. Sarnat HB, Sarnat MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress: a clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol. 1976;33:696-705.
  11. Verdenik I, Novak Antolič Ž, Zupan J. Perinatologia Slovenica II: slovenski perinatalni rezultati za obdobje 2002–11. Ljubljana: Združenje za perinatalno medicino SZD, Ginekološka klinika, UKC, 2013.
  12. Pajntar M. Sprožitev poroda. In: Pajntar M, Novak Antolič Ž, Lučovnik M, et al. Nosečnost in vodenje poroda. Ljubljana: Medicinski Razgledi, 2015:270-3.
  13. Patka JH, Lodolce AE, Johnston AK. High- versus low-dose oxytocin for augmentation or induction of labor. Ann Pharmacother. 2005;39:95-101. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E037.
  14. Wei SQ, Luo ZC, Qi HP, Xu H, Fraser WD. High-dose vs low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203:296-304. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.03.007.
  15. Budden A, Chen LJ, Henry A. High-dose versus low-dose oxytocin infusion regimens for induction of labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(10):CD009701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009701.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2019-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 83
Submitted on: Jul 6, 2018
|
Accepted on: Mar 20, 2019
|
Published on: Mar 26, 2019
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Monika Korenč, Katja Štern, Ivan Verdenik, Miha Lučovnik, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.