Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Measurement of health and social behaviors in schoolchildren: Randomized study comparing paper versus electronic mode Cover

Measurement of health and social behaviors in schoolchildren: Randomized study comparing paper versus electronic mode

Slovenian Journal of Public Health
Volume 58 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)
By: Kastytis Šmigelskas,  Justė Lukoševičiūtė,  Tomas Vaičiūnas,  Kristina Mozūraitytė,  Urtė Ivanavičiūtė,  Ieva Milevičiūtė and  Monika Žemaitaitytė  
Open Access
|Jan 2019

References

  1. Touvier M, Méjean C, Kesse-Guyot E, Pollet C, Malon A, Castetbon K, et al. Comparison between web-based and paper versions of a self-administered anthropometric questionnaire. Eur J Epidemiol. 2010;25(5):287-96. 10.1007/s10654-010-9433-9
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Bech M, Kristensen MB. Differential response rates in postal and web-based surveys among older respondents. Surv Res Methods. 2009;3:1-6. 10.18148/srm/2009.v3i1.592
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Couper MP. The future of modes of data collection. Public Opin Q. 2011;75:889-908. 10.1093/poq/nfr046
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Steelman ZR, Hammer B, Limayem M. Data collection in the digital age: innovative alternatives to student samples. MIS Q. 2014;38:35578. 10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.02
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. van Gelder MMHJ, Bretveld RW, Roeleveld N. Web-based questionnaires: the future in epidemiology? Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172:1292-8. 10.1093/aje/kwq291
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Vereecken CA, Maes L. Comparison of a computer-administered and paper-and-pencil administered questionnaire on health and lifestyle behaviors. J Adolesc Health. 2006;38:426-32. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.10.010
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Inchley J, Currie D, Cosma A, editors. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study protocol: background, methodology and mandatory items for the 2017/18 survey. St Andrews: CAHRU, 2018.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Torsheim T, Cavallo F, Levin K, Schnohr C, Mazur J, Niclasen B, et al. Psychometric validation of the revised family affluence scale: a latent variable approach. Child Indic Res. 2015;9:771-84. 10.1007/s12187-015-9339-x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52:30-41. 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Torsheim T, Samdal O, Rasmussen M, Freeman J, Griebler R, Dür W. Cross-national measurement invariance of the teacher and classmate support scale. Soc Indic Res. 2012;105:145-60. 10.1007/s11205-010-9770-9
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Mascheroni G, Ólafsson K. Net children go mobile: cross-national comparisons: report D3.3. Milano: Educatt, 2014.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Peter J, Valkenburg P. Individual differences in perceptions of internet communication. Eur J Commun. 2006;21:213-26. 10.1177/0267323105064046
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Van den Eijnden RJ, Lemmens JS, Valkenburg PM. The social media disorder scale. Comput Human Behav. 2016;61:478-87. 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.038
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Inchley J, Currie D, Young T, Samdal O, Torsheim T, Augustson L, et al. Growing up unequal: gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. World Health Organisation, Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, 2016;7. Accessed March 19th, 2018 at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/303438/HSBC-No.7-Growing-up-unequal-Full-Report.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Chow S, Shao J, Wang H. Sample size calculations in clinical research. 2nd ed. Chapman & Hall/CRC Biostatistics Series, 2008:89.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Norman GJ, Sallis JF, Gaskins R. Comparability and reliability of paper- and computer-based measures of psychosocial constructs for adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2005;76:315-23. 10.1080/02701367.2005.10599302
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Wright DS, Aquilino W, Supple A. A comparison of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaires in a survey on smoking, alcohol, and drug use. Public Opin Q. 1998;62:331-53. 10.1086/297849
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Smith B, Smith TC, Gray GC, Ryan MAK. When epidemiology meets the internet: web-based surveys in the millennium cohort study. Am J Epidemiol. 2007;166:1345-54. 10.1093/aje/kwm212
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Bojcic JL, Sue VM, Huon TS, Maletis GB, Inacio MCS. Comparison of paper and electronic surveys for measuring patient-reported outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Perm J. 2014;18:22-6. 10.7812/TPP/13-142
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Hardré PL, Crowson HM, Xie K, Ly C. Testing differential effects of computer-based, web-based and paper-based administration of questionnaire research instruments. Br J Educ Technol. 2007;38(1):5-22. 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00591.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Riva G, Teruzzi T, Anolli L. The use of the internet in psychological research: comparison of online and offline questionnaires. Cyberpsychol Behav. 2003;6:73-80. 10.1089/109493103321167983
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Miller ET, Neal DJ, Roberts LJ, Baer JS, Cressler SO, Metrik J, et al. Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between Internet-based assessment and traditional methods? Psychol Addict Behav. 2002;16:56-63. 10.1037/0893-164X.16.1.56
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Carvalho JC, Declerck D, De Vos E, Kellen J, Van Nieuwenhuysen JP, Vanobbergen, et al. Validation of the oral survey-b system for electronic data capture in national oral health surveys. Caries Res. 2016;50:288-94. 10.1159/000445446
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Duracinsky M, Lalanne C, Goujard C, Herrmann S, Cheung-Lung C, Brosseau JP, et al. Electronic versus paper-based assessment of health-related quality of life specific to HIV disease: reliability study of the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(4):e115. 10.2196/jmir.3330
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2019-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 10
Submitted on: Mar 19, 2018
Accepted on: Nov 13, 2018
Published on: Jan 21, 2019
Published by: National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
school-aged children,
health behavior,
social support,
prevalence,
validity,
reliability,
questionnaire design,
Lithuania
Related subjects:
Medicine,
Clinical medicine,
Hygiene and environmental medicine

© 2019 Kastytis Šmigelskas, Justė Lukoševičiūtė, Tomas Vaičiūnas, Kristina Mozūraitytė, Urtė Ivanavičiūtė, Ieva Milevičiūtė, Monika Žemaitaitytė, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 58 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)Next article