Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Causes of differences in the uptake of cardiac implantation electronic devices in Slovenia in comparison to other countries Cover

Causes of differences in the uptake of cardiac implantation electronic devices in Slovenia in comparison to other countries

Open Access
|Jan 2018

References

  1. Mond HG, Proclemer A. The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009 - a World Society of Arrhythmia’s project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34:1013-27. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03150.x.21707667
  2. Camm J, Klein H, Nisam S. The cost of implantable defibrillators: perceptions and reality. Eur Heart J. 2007;28:392-7. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl166.16887857
  3. Allen B. The eleven most implanted medical devices in America. Available June 22, 2016 from: http://247wallst.com/healthcare-economy/2011/07/18/the-eleven-most-implanted-medical-devices-in-america/2/.
  4. Torbica A, Banks H, Valzania C, Boriani G, Fattore G. Investigating regional variation of cardiac implantable electrical device implant rates in European Healthcare systems: what drives differences? Health Econ. 2017;26(Suppl 1):30-45. 10.1002/hec.3470.28139088
  5. MedtecHTA report on geographic variation in utilization rates and determinants of access across European countries for medical devices in electrophysiology, 2015.
  6. Kuck KH, Hindricks G, Padeletti L, Raatikainen P, Arnar DO. The EHRA white book 2015: the current status of cardiac electrophysiology in ESC member countries. European Society of Cardiology, 2015. Available July 10, 2016 from: https://www.escardio.org/static_file/Escardio/Subspecialty/EHRA/Publications/Documents/EHRA_White_book_2015_WEB_FINAL_1.pdf.
  7. Albreht T, Pribakovič Brinovec R, Jošar D, Poldrugovac M, Kostnapfel T, Zaletel M, et al. Slovenia: health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2016;18:1-207.
  8. Patel NJ, Edla S, Deshmukh A, Nalluri N, Patel N, Agnihotri K, et al. Gender, racial, and health insurance differences in the trend of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) utilization: a United States experience over the last decade. Clin Cardiol. 2016;39:63-71. 10.1002/clc.22496.26799597
  9. Narasimha D, Curtis AB. Sex differences in utilisation and response to implantable device therapy. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2015;4:129-35. 10.15420/aer.2015.04.02.129.26835114
  10. Lang CC. Regional variation in ICD implantation rates: the shocking truth? Heart. 2005;91:1251-3. 10.1136/hrt.2004.056754.16162601
  11. McComb JM, Plummer CJ, Cunningham MW, Cunningham D. Inequity of access to implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in England: possible causes of geographical variation in implantation rates. Europace. 2009;11:1308-12. 10.1093/europace/eup264.19797146
  12. Ovsyshcher LE, Furman S. Determinants of geographic variations in pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators implantation rates. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003;26:474-8.1268787110.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00075.x
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2018-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 9
Submitted on: Sep 6, 2016
Accepted on: Sep 8, 2017
Published on: Jan 5, 2018
Published by: National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Valentina Prevolnik Rupel, Renata Erker, Marko Divjak, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.