Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Factors of collective psychological empowerment of active users in the online health community med.over.net Cover

Factors of collective psychological empowerment of active users in the online health community med.over.net

Open Access
|Apr 2014

References

  1. 1. Uporaba informacijsko - komunikacijske tehnologije v gospodinjstvih in pri posameznikih Slovenija: končni podatki.Ljubljana: Statistični urad Republike Slovenije, 2012. Pridobljeno5. 12. 2012 s spletne strani: http://www.stat.si/.
  2. 2. Klemenc-Ketiš Z, Kersnik J. Seeking health advice on the Internet in patients with health problems: a cross-sectional population study in Slovenia. Inform Health Soc Care 2013; 3: 280-90.10.3109/17538157.2013.76430623514043
  3. 3. Demiris G. The diffusion of virtual communities in health care: concepts and challenges. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 62: 178-88.10.1016/j.pec.2005.10.00316406472
  4. 4. Fox S. Medicine 2.0: peer-to-peer healthcare: report.Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Research Center, 2011.
  5. 5. Preece J. Empathic communities: reaching out across the web.Interactions 1998; 2: 32-43.10.1145/274430.274435
  6. 6. Tanis M. Online social support groups. In Joinson A, McKenna KYA, Postmes T, Reips UD, editors. Oxford handbook of internet psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007: 137-52.
  7. 7. Barak A, Boniel-Nissim M, Suler J. Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Comput Hum Behav 2008; 24: 1867-83.10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.004
  8. 8. Santana S, Lausen B, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki CE, Prokosch H-U, Wynn R. Informed citizen and empowered citizen in health: results from an European survey. BMC Fam Pract 2011; 12: 20-35.10.1186/1471-2296-12-20310111821496309
  9. 9. Coulson NS, Malik S. Health-related online support communities.
  10. In: Yan Z, editor. Encyclopedia of cyber-behaviour. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 2012: 671-88.
  11. 10. Bartlett K, Coulson NS. An investigation into the empowerment effects of using online support groups and how this affects doctor/patient communication. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83: 113-9.10.1016/j.pec.2010.05.02920599338
  12. 11. Seckin G. Informational and decisional empowerment in online health support communities: initial psychometric validation of the Cyber Info-Decisional Empowerment Scale (CIDES) and preliminary data from administration of the scale. Support Care Cancer 2011; 19: 2057-61.10.1007/s00520-011-1249-y21858718
  13. 12. Bridges J, Loukanova S, Carrera P. Patient empowerment in health care. In: Heggenhougen K, Quah S, editors. International encyclopedia of public health, Vol. 5. San Diego: Academic Press, 2008: 17-28.
  14. 13. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAJF. Self-reported differences in empowerment between lurkers and posters in online patient support groups. J Med Internet Res 2008; 10: e18. doi:10.2196/jmir.992.10.2196/jmir.992248392518653442
  15. 14. Lemire M, Sicotte C, Paré G. Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. Health Policy 2008; 88: 130-40.10.1016/j.healthpol.2008.03.00618436330
  16. 15. Menon ST. Toward a model of psychological health empowerment: implications for health care in multicultural communities. Nurse Educ Today 2002; 22: 28-39.10.1054/nedt.2001.072111886225
  17. 16. Sharf BF. Communicating breast cancer on-line: support and empowerment on the internet. Women Health 1997; 26: 65-84.10.1300/J013v26n01_05
  18. 17. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Shaw BR, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAJF. Empowering processes and outcomes of participation in online support groups for patients with breast cancer, arthritis, or fibromyalgia. Qual Health Res 2008; 18: 405-17.10.1177/1049732307313429
  19. 18. Speer PW. Intrapersonal and interactional empowerment: implication for theory. J Community Psychol 2000; 28: 51-61.10.1002/(SICI)1520-6629(200001)28:1<;51::AID-JCOP6>3.0.CO;2-6
  20. 19. Zimmerman MA. Psychological empowerment: issues and illustrations. Am J Community Psychol 1995; 23: 581-99.10.1007/BF02506983
  21. 20. Speer PW, Hughey J. Community organizing: an ecological route to empowerment and power. Am J Community Psychol 1995; 23: 729-48.10.1007/BF02506989
  22. 21. Boehm A, Staples LH. Empowerment: the point of view of consumers. Fam Soc 2004; 85: 270-80.10.1606/1044-3894.314
  23. 22. Radin P. ‘‘To me, it’s my life’’: medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace. Soc Sci Med 2006; 62: 591-601.10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.022
  24. 23. Mlinar S. Perceptions of empowerment among part-time nursing students. Zdrav Var 2012; 51: 69-74.10.2478/v10152-012-0008-x
  25. 24. Hur MH. Empowerment in terms of theoretical perspectives: exploring a typology of the process and components across disciplines. J Community Psychol 2006; 34: 523-40.10.1002/jcop.20113
  26. 25. McMillan DW, Chavis DM. Sense of community: a definition and theory. J Community Psychol 1986; 14: 6-23.10.1002/1520-6629(198601)14:1<;6::AID-JCOP2290140103>3.0.CO;2-I
  27. 26. Peterson NA, Lowe JB, Aquilino ML, Schnider JE. Linking social cohesion and interactional empowerment: support and new implications for theory. J Community Psychol 2005; 33: 233-44.10.1002/jcop.20047
  28. 27. Blanchard AL, Welbourne JA, Boughton MA. A model of online trust: the mediating role of norms and sense of virtual community.Inform Commun Society 2011; 14: 76-106.10.1080/13691181003739633
  29. 28. Stavrositu C, Sundar SS. Does blogging empower women? Exploring the role of agency and community. J Comput Mediat Comm 2012; 17: 369-86.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01587.x
  30. 29. Michinov N, Michinov E, Toczek-Capelle MC. Social identity, group processes, and performance in synchronous computermediated communication. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2004; 8: 27-39.10.1037/1089-2699.8.1.27
  31. 30. Matzat U. A theory of relational signals in online groups. New Media Soc 2009; 11: 375-94.10.1177/1461444808101617
  32. 31. Tanis M. Health-related online forums: what’s the big attraction.J Health Commun 2008; 13: 698-714.10.1080/1081073080241531618958781
  33. 32. Verovšek A, Cimerman P. Predstavitev Med.over.net na prireditvi ob 10. letnici delovanja portala na Med.Over.Net.Ljubljana, 2010.
  34. 33. Ip EJ, Barnett MJ, Tenerowicz MJ, Perry PJ. The touro 12-step: a systematic guide to optimizing survey research with online discussion boards. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12: e16.10.2196/jmir.1314295622720507843
  35. 34. Blanchard AL. Testing a model of sense of virtual community.Comput Hum Behav 2008; 24: 2107-23.10.1016/j.chb.2007.10.002
  36. 35. Kraut RE, Resnick P, Kiesler S, Ren Y, Chen Y, Burke M et al.Building successful online communities: evidence-based social design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2012.10.7551/mitpress/8472.001.0001
  37. 36. Obst PL, Stafurik J. Online we are all able bodied: online psychological sense of community and social support found through membership of disability-specific websites promotes well-being for people living with a physical disability. J Community Appl Soc 2010; 20: 525-31.10.1002/casp.1067
  38. 37. Basu A, Dutta MJ. The relationships between health information seeking and community participation: the roles of health information orientation and efficacy. Health Commun 2008; 23: 70-9.10.1080/1041023070180712118443994
  39. 38. Vehovar V, Sicherl P, Hüsing T, Dolničar V. Methodological challenges of digital divide measurements. Inf Soc; 2006: 279-90.10.1080/01972240600904076
  40. 39. Dolničar V. Merjenje dinamike digitalnega razkoraka. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, 2008.
  41. 40. Vehovar V, Travar J. RIS 2008: e-Zdravje in e- Farmacija (#84).Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede, 2009.
  42. 41. Mo PKH, Coulson NS. Developing a model for online support group use, empowering processes and psychosocial outcomes for individuals living with HIV/AIDS. Psychol Health 2012; 27: 445-59.10.1080/08870446.2011.59298121854088
  43. 42. Welbourne JL, Blanchard AL, Wadsworth MB. Motivations in virtual health communities and their relationship to community, connectedness and stress. Comput Hum Behav 2013; 29: 129-39.10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.024
  44. 43. van Uden-Kraan CF, Drossaert CHC, Taal E, Seydel ER, van de Laar MAFJ. Participation in online patient support groups endorses patients’ empowerment. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 61-910.1016/j.pec.2008.07.04418778909
  45. 44. Walther JB. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective. Commun Res 1992; 19: 52-90.10.1177/009365092019001003
  46. 45. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online 2013: report. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Research Center, 2013.
  47. 46. Černigoj Sadar N. Delovanje neformalnih socialnih omrežij pri zadovoljevanju potreb družin. In: Novak M, Černigoj Sadar N, Dragoš S, Ferligoj A, Hlebec V, Kogovšek T, Nagode M, editors.Omrežja socialne opore Slovencev, Ljubljana: Inštitut Republike Slovenije za socialno varstvo, 2004: 133-42.
  48. 47. Lozar Manfreda K, Bosnjak M, Berzelak J, Haas I, Vehovar V. Web surveys versus other survey modes: a meta-analysis comparing response rates. Int J Market Res 2008; 50: 79-104.10.1177/147078530805000107
  49. 48. Ule M, Kamin T. Družbeni dejavniki neenakosti v zdravju. Zdrav Var 2012; 51: 1-4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2014-0014 | Journal eISSN: 1854-2476 | Journal ISSN: 0351-0026
Language: English
Page range: 133 - 143
Published on: Apr 9, 2014
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2014 Andraž Petrovčič, Gregor Petrič, published by National Institute of Public Health, Slovenia
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.