References
- 1. Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S et al. Impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care: systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 742-52.
- 2. Dabbs ADV, Myers BA, McCurry K, Dunbar-Jacob J, Hawkins R, Begey A, Dew Ma. User-centred design and interactive health technologies for patients. CIN - Comp Informat Nurs 2009; 27: 175-83.
- 3. Hammond WE. Seamless care: what is it, what is its value, what does it require, when might we get it? In: Blobel B. Seamless care - safe care. The challenges of interoperability and patient safety in healthcare: proceedings of The EFMI Special Topic Conference, Reykjavik, Iceland, 2010: 3-13.
- 4. Or CKL, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009; 16: 550 -60.
- 5. Walsh SH. The clinician’s perspective on electronic health records and how they can affect patient care. BMJ 2004; 328: 1184-7.
- 6. Leatt P, Shea C, Studer M, Wang V. IT solutions for patient safety-best practices for successful implementation in healthcare. Electron Healthc 2006; 4: 94-104.
- 7. Mitchell E, Sullivan F. A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97. BMJ 2001; 322: 279-82.
- 8. Flynn D, Peggy Gregory P, Makki H, Gabbay M. Expectations and experiences of eHealth in primary care: a qualitative practice-based investigation. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78: 588-604.
- 9. Santana S, Lausen B, Bujnowska-Fedak M, Chronaki C et al. Online communication between doctors and patients in Europe: status and perspectives. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12: e2.
- 10. Lium JT, Faxvaag A. Removal of paper-based health records from Norwegian hospitals: effects on clinical workflow. Stud Health Technol Inform 2006; 124: 1031.
- 11. Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, Wynn A, Hammersley V et al. The electronic patient record in primary care-regression or progression?: a cross sectional study. BMJ 2003; 326: 1439-43.
- 12. Bates DW, Teich JM, Lee J, Seger D, Kuperman GJ, Ma’Luf N et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999; 6: 313-21.
- 13. Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Bokun T, McKinstry B, Procter R, Majeed A, Sheikh A. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med 2011; 8: e10003872011. Available October 10, 2011 at: http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info.
- 14. Kolšek M. Implementing electronic medical record in family practice in Slovenia and other former Yugoslav republics: barriers and requirements. Srp Arh Celok Lek 2009; 137: 664-9.
- 15. European Commission - Information Society and Media Directorate General. Benchmarking ICT use among general practitioners in Europe: final report. Bon: Empirica, 2008.
- 16. Terry AL, Thorpe CF, Giles G, Brown JB, Harris SB, Reid GJ et al. Implementing electronic health records: key factors in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2008; 54: 730-6.
- 17. Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ, Rossos PG. Patient-perceived usefulness of online electronic medical records: employing grounded theory in the development of information and communication technologies for use by patients living with chronic illness. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005; 12: 306-14.
- 18. Ross SE, Todd J, Moore LA, Beaty BL, Wittevrongel L, Lin CT. Expectations of patients and physicians regarding patientaccessible medical records. J Med Internet Res 2005; 7: e13.
- 19. Neville RG, GreeneAC, Lewis S. Patient and health care professional views and experiences of computer agentsupported health care. Inf Prim Care 2006; 14: 11-5.
- 20. Garrido MV, Zentner A, Busse R. The effects of gatekeeping: a systematic review of the literature. Scan J Primary Health Care 2011; 29: 28-38.
- 21. Bodenheimer T, Lo B, Casalino L. Primary care physicians should be coordinators, not gatekeepers. JAMA 1999; 281: 2045-9.
- 22. Seifert B, Svab I, Madis T, Kersnik J, Windak A, Steflova A et al. Perspectives of family medicine in Central and Eastern Europe. Family Practice 2008; 25: 113-8.
- 23. Petek-Ster M, Svab I, Zivcec-Kalan G. Factors related to consultation time: experience in Slovenia. Scan J Primary Health Care 2008; 26: 29-34.
- 24. Boerma, WGW, Van Der Zee J, Fleming DM. Service profiles of general practitioners in Europe. Br J Gen Pract 1997; 47: 481-6.
- 25. Allen J, Gay B, Crebolder H, Heyrman J, Svab I, Ram P et al. The European definition of general practice / family medicine - short version. Euract, 2005. Available September 10, 2011 at: http://www.euract.eu/official-documents/finish/3-officialdocuments/95-european-definition-of-general-practicefamilymedicine-2005-short-version.
- 26. Drnovšek S, Giest S, Dumortier J, Artmann J. eHealth strategies study, country brief: Slovenia. European Commission, DG Information Society and Media, ICT for Health Unit. Bonn, Brussels, 2010. Available September 10, 2012 at: http://ehealthstrategies. eu/database/documents/Slovenia_CountryBrief_ eHStrategies.pdf.
- 27. Kersnik J, Bossman P, Svab I. The patient’s leading reasons for choosing personal family physician. Zdrav Var 1998; 37: 185-90.
- 28. Klancar D, Kersnik J, Svab I. The vision of health centers in Slovenia. Zdrav Var 2010; 49: 37-43.
- 29. Jha AK, Doolan D, Grandt D, Scott T, Bates DW et al. The use of health information technology in seven nations. Int J Med Inform 2006; 77: 848-54.
- 30. Menachemi N, Brooks RG. EHR and other IT adoption among physicians: results of a large-scale statewide analysis. J Health Care Inform Manag 2006; 20: 79-87.
- 31. Anderson JG. Social, ethical and legal barriers to e-health. Int J Med Inform 2007; 56: 480-3.
- 32. Ventres W, Kooienga S, Vuckovic N, Marlin R, Nygren P, Stewart V. Physicians, patients, and the electronic health record: an ethnographic analysis. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4: 124-31.
- 33. Kaplan B, Maxwell JA. Qualitative research methods for evaluating computer information systems: evaluating health care information systems: methods and applications. 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2006: 30-55.
- 34. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2000.
- 35. Burrows D, Kendall S. Focus groups: what are they and how can they be used in nursing and health care research? Soc Sci Health 1997: 244-53.
- 36. Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Newbury Park: Sage, 2002: 40-1.
- 37. Kitzinger J. Qualitative research: introducing focus groups. Br Med J 1995; 311: 299-302.
- 38. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park: Sage, 1990.
- 39. Polkinghorne DE. Language and meaning: data collection in qualitative research. J Counsel Psychol 2005; 52: 137-45.
- 40. Rabiee F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutrit Soc 2004; 63: 655-60.
- 41. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. BMJ 2000; 320: 114-6.
- 42. Kendall J. Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. West J Nurs Res 1999; 21: 743-57.
- 43. Golafshani N. Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. Qual Report 2003; 84: 597-607.
- 44. Guion LA. Triangulation: establishing the validity of qualitative studies. University of Florida FCS6014, 2002: 1-3. Available December 10, 2012 at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu.
- 45. Shaw NT. Learning from experience: a new approach to evaluating health information systems. J Comm Comp 2010; 7: 52-61.
- 46. Rahimi B, Vimarlund V, Timpka T. Health information system implementation: a qualitative meta-analysis. J Med Syst 2009; 5: 359-68.
- 47. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications - some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64: 39-56.
- 48. Christensen T, Grimsmo A. Instant availability of patient records, but diminished availability of patient information: a multi-method study of GP’s use of electronic patient records. BMC Med Inform Dec Making 2008; 8: 12.
- 49. Shcherbatykh I, Holbrook A, Thabane L, Dolovich L. Methodologic issues in health informatics trials: the complexities of complex interventions. JAMIA 2008; 15: 575-80.
- 50. Lilford RJ, Foster J, Pringle M. Evaluating eHealth: how to make evaluation more methodologically robust. PLoS Med 2009; 6: 1-5.
- 51. Stroetmann KA, editor. European countries on their journey towards national eHealth infrastructures: eHealth strategies report. European Commission Information Society 2011. Available July 27, 2012 at: www.ehealth-strategies.eu/report/report.html.
- 52. Welcome to epSOS - a European eHealth Project. Available January 01, 2012 at: http://www.epsos.eu/.
- 53. epSOS Deliverable D3.1.2 Final definition of functional service requirements: ePrescription. Available January 01, 2012 at: 54. http://www.epsos.eu/fileadmin/content/pdf/deliverables/D3.1.2_Final_Definition_.
- 55. Schade CP, Sullivan FM, Lusignan S. Madeley J. E-prescribing, efficiency, quality: lessons from the computerization of UK family practice. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2006; 13: 470-5.
- 56. Protti D. Comparison of information technology in general practice in 10 countries. Healthc Q 2007; 10: 107-16.
- 57. Pluye P, Grad RM, Dunikowski LG, Stephenson R. Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: a literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies. Int J Med Inform 2005; 74: 745-68.
- 58. Tsiknakis M, Kouroubali A. Organizational factors affecting successful adoption of innovative eHealth services: a case study employing the FITT framework. Int J Med Inform 2009; 78: 39-52.
- 59. Demiris G, Afrin Lb, Speedie S, Courtney Kl, Sondhi M, Vimarlund V et al. Patient-centered applications: use of information technology to promote disease management and wellness. A White Paper by the AMIA Knowledge in Motion Working Group. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008; 15: 8-13.
- 60. Paré G, Sicotte C, Jaana M, Girouard D. Prioritizing the risk factors influencing the success of clinical information system projects: a Delphi study in Canada. Methods Inf Med 2008; 47: 251-9.
- 61. Sweidan M, Williamson M, Reeve JF, Harvey K, O’Neill JA, Schattner P, Snowdon T. Evaluation of features to support safety and quality in general practice clinical software. BMC Med Inform Dec Making 2011: 1127.
- 62. Hoo WE, Parisi LL. Nursing informatics approach to analyzing staffing effectiveness indicators. J Nurs Care Qual 2005; 20: 215-9.
- 63. Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA et al. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. J Biomed Inform 2005; 38: 176-88.
- 64. Lo H, Newmark L, Yoon C et al. Electronic health records in specialty care: a time-motion study. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007; 14: 609-15.
- 65. Richardson JE, Ash JS. Focus on clinical care and patient safety: a clinical decision support needs assessment of communitybased physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18: i28-35.
- 66. Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ 2005; 330: 765-73.
- 67. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, Rosas- Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293: 1223-38.
- 68. Short D, Frischer M, Bashford J. Barriers to the adoption of computerised decision support systems in general practice consultations: a qualitative study of GPs’ perspectives. Int J Med Inform 2004; 73: 357-62.
- 69. Christensen T, Grimsmo A. Expectations for the next generation of electronic patient records in primary care: a triangulated study. Inform Prim Care 2008; 16: 21-8.
- 70. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-clinical decision support systems literature review. Int J Med Inform 2001; 64: 15-37.
- 71. Winkelman WJ, Leonard KJ. Overcoming structural constraints to patient utilization of electronic medical records: a critical review and proposal for an evaluation framework. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004; 11: 151-61.
- 72. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, Macfarlane F et al. How to spread good ideas: a systematic review of the literature on diffusion, dissemination and sustainability of innovations in health service delivery and organisation. Report for the National Co-ordinating Centre for NHS Service Delivery and Organisation R & D, 2004. Available May 10, 2011 at: http:// www.sdo.nihr.ac.uk/files/project/38-finalreport.pdf.
- 73. Faber MG. Design and introduction of an electronic patient record: how to involve users? Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 371-5.
- 74. Joos D, Chen Q, Jirjis J, Johnson KB. An electronic medical record in primary care: impact on satisfaction, work efficiency and clinic processes. Paper presented at: AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2006.
- 75. Smelcer JB. Jacobs HM, Kantrovich L. Usability of electronic medical records. J Usability Studies 2009, 4: 70-84.
- 76. American Medical Association (AMA). Standardized user interface for electronic medical records. Available December 10, 2011 at: http://www.ama-assn.org.
- 77. Holroyd-Leduc JM, Lorenzetti D, Straus SE, Sykes L, Quan H. The impact of the electronic medical record on structure, process, and outcomes within primary care: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011; 18: 732 -7.
- 78. Berg M. The search for synergy: interrelating medical work and patient care information systems. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42: 337-44.
- 79. Leskošek V. Social determinants of health: the indicators for measuring the impact of poverty on health. Zdrav Var 2012; 51: 21-32.