Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Approaches, Methods and Tools of Rights of Access to Sunlight around the World Cover

Approaches, Methods and Tools of Rights of Access to Sunlight around the World

By: Jozef Hraška  
Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Neeman, E. – Light, W. – Hopkinson, R. G. (1976)Recommendations for the admission and control of sunlight in buildings. Building and Environment, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 91–101.10.1016/0360-1323(76)90025-1
  2. Boubekri, M. (2008)Daylighting, Architecture and Health: Building Design Strategies. 1 ed., Architectural Press, Amsterdam; Boston; London, 160 pp.10.1016/B978-0-7506-6724-1.00006-3
  3. Holick, M. F (2008)Sunlight, vitamin D and health: A D-lightful story. In: Solar Radiation and Human Health, The Norwegian Academy of Science and Letters, pp. 147–166.
  4. Hobday, R. A. (1997)Sunlight Therapy and Solar Architecture. Medical History, Vol. 42, pp. 455–472.10.1017/S0025727300063043
  5. Littlefair, P. J (2011)Site layout planning for daylight, and sunlight: a guide to good practice. BRE Report, CRC, Garston. Second edition.
  6. Hraška, J. (2004)Solar and daylight rights in Slovakia – their meaning for energy and urban design. In: Proceedings of Contexts of Architecture, 38th International Conference of Architectural Science Association (ANZAScA), Launceston, Australia, 10-12 Nov. 2004, pp. 265–269.
  7. Darula, S. – Christoffersen, J. – Malikova, M. (2015) Sunlight and insolation of building interiors. Energy Procedia, Vol. 78, pp. 1245–1250.10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.266
  8. Hachem, C. – Fazio, F. – Athienitis, A. (2013)Solar optimized residential neighborhoods: Evaluation and design methodology. Solar Energy, Vol. 95, pp. 42–64.10.1016/j.solener.2013.06.002
  9. Chynoweth, P. (2009)Progressing the rights to light debate: Part 3: judicial attitudes to current practice. Structural Survey Journal, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 7–19.10.1108/02630800910941647
  10. Hraška, J. (2011)Daylight requirements in sustainable building rating systems. Ingineria Illuminatului (Journal of Lighting Engineering), Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 5–11.
  11. Cheng, V. – Steemers, K. – Montavon, M. – Compagnon, R. (2006) Urban form, density and solar potential. In: Proceedings of the 23th Conference on PLEA, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 701–706.
  12. Seong, Y.B. – Lim, J.H – Yeo, M.S – Goh, I.D – Kim, K.W. (2006)HELIOS: Solar rights analysis system for apartment buildings. Solar Energy, Vol. 80, No. 6, pp. 723–741.10.1016/j.solener.2005.11.008
  13. Lobaccaro G. – Frontini F. (2014)Solar Energy in urban environment: how urban densification effect existing building. Energy Procedia Journal, Vol. 48; pp.1559–1569.10.1016/j.egypro.2014.02.176
  14. Lepore, M. (2017)The right to the sun in the urban design. Vitruvio, International Journal of Architecture Technology and Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 25–43.10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2017.7459
  15. Shaviv E., Yezioro, A. (1997)Analyzing Mutual Shading Between Buildings. Solar Energy, Vol. 59, No. 1-3, pp. 83–88.10.1016/S0038-092X(96)00103-X
  16. Capeluto, I.G. – Shaviv, E. (2001)On the use of “Solar Volume” for determining the Urban fabric. Solar Energy, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 275–280.10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00088-8
  17. Dogan, T. – Reinhart, C. F. – Michelatos, P. (2012) Urban daylight simulation: Calculating the daylit area of urban designs. Fifth National Conference of IBPSA-USA SimBuild, Aug. 1-3, Madison, WI, USA, pp. 613–620.
  18. Kima, H. – Yi, Y.K. (2019)QuVue implementation for decisions related to high-rise residential building layouts. Building and Environment, Vol. 148, pp. 116–127.10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.055
  19. Yi, Y. K. – Kim, H. (2015) Agent-based geometry optimization with Genetic Algorithm (GA) for tall apartment’s solar right. Solar Energy, Vol. 113, pp. 236–250.10.1016/j.solener.2014.11.007
  20. Compagnon, R. (2004) Solar and daylight availability in the urban fabric. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 36, pp. 321–328.10.1016/j.enbuild.2004.01.009
  21. Ekici, B. – Cubukcuoglu, C. – Turrin, M. – Sariyildiz, I. S. (2019) Performative computational architecture using swarm and evolutionary optimisation: A review. Building and Environment, Vol. 147, pp. 356–371.10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.023
  22. Ratti, C. – Morello, E. (2005) SunScapes: extending the ‘solar envelopes’ concept through ‘iso-solar surfaces’. In: PLEA2005 – The 22nd Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture. Beirut, Lebanon, 6 pp.
  23. Seong, Y. B. – Kim, Y. Y. – Seok, H. T. – Choi, J. M. – Yeo, M. S. – Kim, K. W. (2011) Automatic computation for optimum height planning of apartment buildings to improve solar access. Solar Energy, Vol. 85, pp. 154–173.10.1016/j.solener.2010.10.007
  24. López, C. S. P. – Sala, M. – Tagliabue, L. Ch. – Frontini, F. – Bouziri, S. (2016) Solar Radiation and Daylighting Assessment Using the Sky-view Factor (SVF) Analysis as Method to Evaluate Urban Planning Densification Policies Impacts. Energy Procedia, Vol. 91, pp. 989–996.10.1016/j.egypro.2016.06.266
  25. Teller, J. – Azar, S.: TOWNSCOPE II (2001) A computer system to support solar access decision-making. Solar Energy, Vol. 70, No. 3, pp. 187–200.10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00097-9
  26. Mardaljevic, J. – Rylatt, M. (2003) Irradiation mapping of complex urban environments: an image-based approach. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 35, pp. 27–35.10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00077-4
  27. De Luca, F. – Dogan, T. (2019) A novel solar envelope method based on solar ordinances for urban planning. Building simulation, Vol. 12, pp. 817–834.10.1007/s12273-019-0561-1
  28. Perez, D. – Kämpf, J. – Wilke, U. – Papadopoulo, M. – Robinson, D. (2011) Citysim Simulation: the Case Study of Alt-Wiedikon, a Neighborhood of Zürich city. CISBAT, Lauzanne, Switzerland, 6 pp.
  29. Lia, L. – Leid, Y. – Tanga, L. – Yana, F. – Luoa, F. – Zhua, H. (2019) A 3D spatial data model of the solar rights associated with individual residential properties. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 74, pp. 88–99.10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.12.003
  30. Zhang, J. – Heng, C. K. – Malone-Lee, L. C. – Hii, D. J. C. – Janssen, P. – Leung, K. S. – Tan, B. K. (2012) Evaluating environmental implications of density: a comparative case study on the relationship between density, urban block typology and sky exposure. Automation in Construction, Vol. 22, pp. 90–101.10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.011
  31. Mohajeria, N. – Gudmundsson, A. – Kunckler, T. – Upadhyay, G. – Assouline, D. – Kämpf, J. H. – Scartezzini, J. L. (2019) A solar-based sustainable urban design: The effects of city-scale streetcanyon geometry on solar access in Geneva, Switzerland. Applied Energy, Vol. 240, pp. 173–190.10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.014
  32. Aries, M. B. S. – Aarts, M. P. J. – Van Hoof, J. (2015) Daylight and health: A review of the evidence and consequences for the built environment. Lighting Research and Technology, Vol. 47, pp. 6–27.10.1177/1477153513509258
  33. Pauley, S. M. (2004) Lighting for the human circadian clock: recent research indicates that lighting has become a public health issue. Medical Hypotheses, Vol. 63, pp. 588–596.10.1016/j.mehy.2004.03.020
  34. Rea, M. S. – Figueiro, M. G. – Bierman, A. – Hammer, R. (2012) Modeling the spectral sensitivity of the human circadian system. Lighting Research and Technology, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 386–396.10.1177/1477153511430474
  35. Ng, E. (2003) Studies on daylighting design and regulation of high-density residential housing in Hong Kong. Lighting Research and Technology, 2003, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 127–139.10.1191/1477153503li087oa
  36. Knowles, R. L. (2003) The solar envelope: its meaning for energy and buildings. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 35, pp. 15–25.10.1016/S0378-7788(02)00076-2
  37. Bronin, S. (2009) Solar Rights. Boston University Law Review, Vol. 89, No.1217.
  38. Rosenthal, E. J. (2013) Letting the Sunshine In: Protecting Residential Access to Solar Energy in Common Interest Developments. Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 4, Article 6, pp. 995–1025.
  39. Reitze, G. L. (1976) A Solar Rights Zoning Guarantee: Seeking New Law in Old Concepts. Washington University Law Review, 1976, Vol., No. 3, 29 pp.
  40. Morello et al. (2009) Sustainable urban block design through passive architecture, a tool that uses urban geometry optimisation to compute energy savings. In: Proceedings of 26th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Quebec City, Canada, 6 pp.
  41. Capeluto, I. G. – Shaviv, E. (2001) On the use of “solar volume” for determining the urban fabric. Solar Energy, Vol. 70, pp. 275–280.10.1016/S0038-092X(00)00088-8
  42. Vartholomaios, A. (2015) The residential solar block envelope: A method for enabling the development of compact urban blocks with high passive solar potential. Energy and Buildings, Vol. 99, pp. 303–312.10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.04.046
  43. Cotton, J. F. (1996) Solid modeling as a tool for constructing solar envelopes. Automation in Construction, Vol. 5, pp. 185–192.10.1016/0926-5805(96)00148-3
  44. Panão, M. J. N. O. – Gonçalves, H. J. P. – Ferrão, P. M. C. (2008) Optimization of the urban building efficiency potential for mid-latitude climates using a genetic algorithm approach. Renewable Energy, Vol. 33, pp. 887–896.10.1016/j.renene.2007.04.014
  45. Stasinopoulos, T. N. (2018) A survey of solar envelope properties using solid modelling. Journal of Green Building, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 3–30.10.3992/1943-4618.13.1.3
  46. SanPiN 2.2.1/2.1.1.1076-01 “Gigiyenicheskiye trebovaniya k insolyatsii i solntsezashchite pomeshcheniy zhilykh i obshchestvennykh zdaniy i territoriy” (in Russian)
  47. Regulation No. 268/2009 about technical requirements for buildings (Vyhláška č. 268/2009 Sb. o technických požadavcích na stavby. (in Czech)
  48. ČSN 73 4301:2004 Obytné budovy. (Dwellings) (in Czech)
  49. Regulation No. 532/2002 of the Ministry of Environment of the Slovak Republic. (Vyhláška č. 532/2002 Ministerstva životného prostredia Slovenskej republiky, ktorou sa ustanovujú podrobnosti o všeobecných technických požiadavkách na výstavbu a o všeobecných technických požiadavkách na stavby užívané osobami s obmedzenou schopnosťou pohybu a orientácie.) (in Slovak) (Decree No. 532/2002 of the Ministry of the Environment of the Slovak Republic laying down details on general technical requirements for construction and general technical requirements for buildings used by persons with reduced mobility)
  50. STN 73 4301:2005 Budovy na bývanie. (Dwellings) (in Slovak)
  51. Regulation No. 620/2002 of the Ministry of Infrastructure on the technical requirements to be met by buildings and their placement (Poland)
  52. People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Construction (1993) Code of urban residential areas planning & design. GB 50180-93. Beijing: China Building Industry Press
  53. Urban Land Use Planning System in Japan (2007) 2nd Edition, Japan International Cooperation Agency in Cooperation with Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, March 2007, 71 pp.
  54. Building Act (2009) Article 61 (Korean Legislation Research Institute, 2009)
  55. DIN 5034-1:2011-07 Daylight in interiors - Part 1: General requirements. (Germany)
  56. BS 8206-2:2008 Lighting for buildings. Code of practice for daylighting. (U.K.)
  57. RT I 2002 - Ehitusseadus (Building act) and standard EVS 894:2008/A2:2015 Daylight in dwellings and offices. (Estonia)
  58. Technical Guidelines TSG-1-004:2010 “Efficient energy use”. (Slovenia)
  59. EN 17037:2018 Daylight in buildings. (European Union)
  60. State Environmental Planning Policy No 65 - Design Quality of Residential Apartment Development (SEPP 65) and the Apartment Design Guide
  61. Auckland design manual (2018)http://www.aucklanddesignmanual.co.nz/sites-and-buildings/apartments
  62. Solar Access Guide (1981) Section 9-9-17, BRC 1981 (City of Boulder, Colorado, USA)
  63. Solar Access (2011) Land Use Ordinance 18.70, City of Ashland, Oregon, USA
  64. Stadt Wien. Info für Nachbarinnen. Juli 2009, Vienna, Austria; www.bauen.wien.at (in German)
  65. Kanton Zürich, Baudirektion, Allgemeine Bauverordnung (ABV), Änderung der Schattenwurfregelung – Erläuterungsbericht Vernehmlassung 30. November 2018 bis 22. März 2019 (in German)
  66. Hraska, J. – Stujber, M. (2000) Manual of program OSV1-UT. 2000, Private publication, Bratislava, Slovakia
  67. Johnson, D. G – Watson, I. D. (1987) Graphical estimation of sky-view factors in urban environments. Journal of Climatology, Vol. 7; pp. 193–197.10.1002/joc.3370070210
  68. Grimmond C. S. B. – Potter S. K. – Zutter H. N. – Souch, C. (2001) Rapid methods to estimate sky-view factors applied to urban areas. International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 21, pp. 903–913.10.1002/joc.659
  69. Chatzipoulka, Ch. – Compagnon, R. – Kaempf, J. – Nikolopoulou, M. (2018) Sky view factor as predictor of solar availability on building façades. Solar Energy, Vol. 170, pp. 1026–1038.10.1016/j.solener.2018.06.028
  70. Mardaljevic, J. (2004) The quantification of solar access in dense urban environments. Lecture at Hong Kong Polytechnic University, http://www.iesd.dmu.ac.uk/~jm
  71. Schiler, M. – Uen-Fang, P. (1993) Solvelope: an interactive computer program for defining and drawing solar envelopes. In: Proceedings of the 18th National Passive Solar Conference, ASES, Washington, USA, pp. 9–14.
  72. Noble, D. – Kensek K. (1998) Computer generated solar envelopes in architecture. The Journal of Architecture, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 117–127.10.1080/136023698374233
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/sjce-2019-0031 | Journal eISSN: 1338-3973 | Journal ISSN: 1210-3896
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 52
Published on: Dec 31, 2019
Published by: Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Jozef Hraška, published by Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.